Yet again I see all the perverted rules, or misunderstanding of particular rules in different conditions.
EG - batteries should (or shall) be fused.
Some of the caveats and exceptions:
Not if it is physically secure (eg telco bus bar DC supplies; car starter cables, or SHORT runs).
Short runs may not be "physically secure", but the chances of a short over that small distance (or melting wire hazard) are riskable.
Fuses shall (obviously) be as close to the power source (battery) as practical. Hence consideration given to mounting hardware etc. EG - better to have a secure cable to a remote mounted fusebox than riskier fittings on top of or closer to the battery.
nstillmatic wrote:
I was told that there should be a fuse at least 12" away from each battery |
|
|
Why? Does that person suspect a gas risk? Aren't you using approved spark proof fuses & breakers?
I was once told to drain my carbies before leaving my vehicles for long periods. Why? So that
they could make money cleaning the resulting corrosion out of the carby. (Else by well intentioned people to gullible or brainless to know otherwise.)
The only general rule I give to such advice is to only follow the advice given by the minority - never the majority. (Generally speaking that is!)
There is no "general" fuse rule with specific distance.
The general rule is "as close as possible" but "without being stupid".
EG - IMO your 200A fuse does NOT meet that rule.
Your last pic probably shows a greater hazard because of that fuse.
Either remove it, else add insulation etc to prevent fraying.
But that length is IMO too long. A shorter smaller gauge probably has less resistance - definitely if run direct with no fuse.
Ignore what you were told about a second battery.
Yes - you have protection (fuses or breakers) at each end of the battery hot interconnection.
From there it depends on what you want.
If they are to be permanently connected in parallel, then you want matching batteries - ie, from the same batch and history with both batteries located together with matched +ve & -ve bridging connections and power taken from the +ve of one and the -ve of the other.
Deviate from that and the batteries become less
matched.
But I never recommend parallel batteries unless in constant use.
Why - because if one fails, both do. Your paralleled 5-year life-rated batteries may last 5 years or more, but if one fails within a few months, they both fail. (IE - a battery comprising 2 matched "monoblocks" has twice the failure probability of the single monoblock. Except that in the parallel case, the bad battery will destroy the good battery. [Whereas in series, no damage if not being charged.] And dare I mention acid, heat and thermal runaway?)
Hence they should have a isolator.
I use the charge light to control plain relays.
If no charge light (circuit) is available, then voltage sensing isolators can be used.
But typical alternator charge-light circuits win hands-down as battery isolators, and are cheaper and infinitely scalable to boot (in general, you merely add an ordinary on-off relay of your choosing).
And as with advice, be wary of the hype & bullsh with the various "smart" battery isolators, charge splitters etc.
I just bagged a particular splitter's advertisement for being a pile of bullsh (subject to recall or penalties if shown here). See
here (Reply #13) on mp3car if interested.
PS - I forgot to detail the fuse "not on top" explosion risk in case of gassing (hydrogen gas from any lead-acid battery - especially deprecated bateries; especially wet cells, but AGMs too).
But I'll omit that. I don't want to drag up the common hype about connecting the +ve terminal first (because that's where the hydrogen is) (sic).