Print Page | Close Window

Steel enclosures

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=40662
Printed Date: May 18, 2024 at 1:45 AM


Topic: Steel enclosures

Posted By: chevyman26
Subject: Steel enclosures
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 2:25 AM

I never hear anything about enclosures made of metals. What is the reason that metal is never used? I mean, aside from the weight factor, if you stuck your head inside a 2 cu. ft steel box and hit it with a hammer, your ears will ring for an hour. We're talking like 3/8" steel sheets welded up airtight. I was gonna just try it after work tonight or tomorrow, but i don't want to waste my time if it's been done and proven to suck. Thanks. 

-------------
You'd better get me out of this lord... or else you'll have me to deal with. -- Hunter S. Thompson "F.A.L.I.L.V."



Replies:

Posted By: boxmaker85
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 8:36 AM
Wouldn't the steal flex?  Especially over a large flat surface.  Let me know how it works.




Posted By: DYohn
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 9:40 AM

It's not used for exactly the reason you mention: something that will "ring for hours" is not a good material to use for an enclosure.  A good enclosure is acoustically neutral.  Metal is generally anything but that.  If metal is used for enclosures, it must be lined with MDF or dense sound-absorbant material such as Sonex, and then braces and reinforcements must be welded into it to prevent flexing.  In my opinion, it is not worth the extra effort, expense, or time, and the sound quality of the resulats are generally not satisfactory... and if it's the look of a metal enclosure you're after, I suggest building a standard MDF enclosure and attaching metal panels to the outside.



-------------
Support the12volt.com




Posted By: jeffchilcott
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 7:24 PM
i would go with dyohn in every aspect the flexing would be horrible, and the rining noise is not a good thing....if you notice if you hit a box in side outside it is a very dull noise....also I would think just resonant frequencys might be able to travel through the metal..not really sure but I wouldnt go that route

-------------
2009 0-1000 Trunk WR 154.0DB 2009 1001+ Trunk WR
2007 USACI World Champion
2007 World Record
2006 USACI Finals 2nd Place




Posted By: Rushman
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 9:26 PM
I strongly agree that no kind of metal is accousticly favorable. However , a couple of years ago I built an encloser for an extended cab truck out of MDF and carpeted all the edges about 2 inches in and then had Diamond Guard Panels fabricated and then chromed and installed them over the surface of the MDF box so that they looked In-layed into the box. It was a really cool Industrial metal look but still retained the accoustical value of the subs.




Posted By: gcorrea
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 9:44 PM
have you ever seen the dynamat trash can display that has a sub mounted to it , it sounds just like that, trash.

-------------
gcorrea




Posted By: MAXST
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 9:47 PM
3/8inch steel plate tho...that wont flex guys.  I think 1/8in would be over kill. 

-------------
I need quality equipment, feel free to donate.




Posted By: Ravendarat
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 10:09 PM
Still gonna resonat like a MF'er though

-------------
double-secret reverse-osmosis speaker-cone-induced high-level interference distortion, Its a killer




Posted By: Rushman
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 10:12 PM
This is beginning to sound like a Monster Garage Challenge.




Posted By: heavilymedicate
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 10:50 PM

worked in a fabrication shop for 3 years.  In that time I installed a audio system in a fellas 2002 Dakota who also worked there.  This exact subject came up and he (being such a hotshot welder) said, "stealth box my ass, I'll just build one".  I tried to talk him out of it for the same reasons mentioned above.  He was convinced it would work.  We messed around with several materials and found aluminum to be the most acoustically dead.  Aluminum is a softer metal and does not resonate like other types of metal.  We tested this by taking tubes of approximately the same size and hitting them with hammer, tapping on them, basically playing with them.  Not very scientific.  Oh well, that was my observation, we never got the chance to build it as he moved out of state.  I wish we had done it though, would have been a fun project.

Yeah, the flexing is not really an issue with such short spans and thick plates.  I would use 1/8 to 1/4 inch.  Aluminum is also not magnetic, another bonus.  Will not rust, is soft enough to drill easily.  Its lighter.  The only down fall is price (and a little harder to weld, I'm a decent welder if your wondering). 

Well, if you build it, post pics.  Good luck : )





Posted By: gus1
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 11:33 PM
You could just use 1/8".... and then line that sucker with, oh I dunno.... a couple inches of Concrete. You would get an very dead, albeit very heavy, dense and non resonant sub box. I've always wanted to do a concrete sub box... I think it would be the cat's pajamas.

Gus


-------------
Wherever I go, that is where I end up......




Posted By: Rushman
Date Posted: October 11, 2004 at 11:42 PM
I told you , first Metal , and now Concrete boxes. This has Jesse James all over it.

-------------
99 F-one fitty
Pioneer Premier H/U
Alpine EQ
Kicker 1200 amp
4 Kicker comp 10s
6 kicker SS65.2 components




Posted By: chevyman26
Date Posted: October 12, 2004 at 12:04 AM

Well, I'm basically a fabricator/maintenance mechanic at a factory, and am the call-in welder (for the tougher jobs that the other guys don't feel confident enough to do (stainless piping, precision work.) I have access to all kinds of scraps for free, hence the idea.  I thought of the 3/8" because of the flex factor. I bet a Parthenon would have it's work cut out to make that flex. I was thinking about it all day, and I imagine it to be boomy, and nothing else.  Although... we do have some stuff at work... it's called Chockfast Red SG. Resin, Hardener, and aggregate. Denser and stronger than concrete, yet lighter and more workable after drying. We use it for pouring around the footings of machinery and rebuilding the faces of press rolls. Maybe if I line the box with that too....

I didn't want to do it for looks or anything, it's just an idea I had. Like I said, there is the weight factor. If I made a square box with all 12" sides out of 3/8" it would probably be a good 60-70 lbs. Add in the resin and a decent driver, it could end up being 100 lbs. in 1 cu. ft.  But the possibilities for custom designed boxes would be as endless as with 'glass.

Thanks for the replies. I probably will try it after work some night when I am bored, just for my own morbid curiosity. I will post pics and results when/if I do.



-------------
You'd better get me out of this lord... or else you'll have me to deal with. -- Hunter S. Thompson "F.A.L.I.L.V."




Posted By: chevyman26
Date Posted: October 12, 2004 at 12:10 AM

Rushman wrote:

I told you , first Metal , and now Concrete boxes. This has Jesse James all over it.

Have you seen the van that Dave Jennings (multi-time SBN top 3 places and many other comps.) runs? The majority of the van was encased in concrete. Then he tore that out and used resin and sand. He's probably on to something else by now.

Oh yeah, and

DYohn] wrote:

t's not used for exactly the reason you mention: something that will "ring for hours" is not a good material to use for an enclosure. 
I was talking about my ears ringing for hours, not the metal box,but yeah, I see what you are saying.



-------------
You'd better get me out of this lord... or else you'll have me to deal with. -- Hunter S. Thompson "F.A.L.I.L.V."




Posted By: Rushman
Date Posted: October 12, 2004 at 7:32 AM
Too cool. I havent seen the Van. I was just being sarcastic but hey , if it works. Ive taken 2 semesters of Audio Engineering class at local college. First semester was just about accoustics and how we percive sound. We discussed different materials and how sound if affected by them. One of the materials was Concrete and how its used in a recording studio to line certain walls but I never though anyone would have applied that principle to a Van but it DOES make sence.

-------------
99 F-one fitty
Pioneer Premier H/U
Alpine EQ
Kicker 1200 amp
4 Kicker comp 10s
6 kicker SS65.2 components




Posted By: thapimpfromchi
Date Posted: October 12, 2004 at 8:13 AM
It's been done before man. Good results too. I forgot who said it, but yes, if you are going to go through with this use aluminum as it is acoustically "dead" The install i saw was in one of my car audio magazines. It was in a yellow H2. the guy used like 7 JL subs in this massive enclosure. it came out really really nice and the reason i say it worked well.. he's hitting about 152 db. I'll look for the issue, and see if i can get pics of the install for you.

-------------
1990 Honda Civic HB:
Clarion DXZ545MP H.U.
2- 6.5" Power Acoustik interiors
Diamond Audio 600.1 amp
Diamond Audio 15" M6MKII
Pyramid PB881X 4 CH. Amp




Posted By: chevyman26
Date Posted: October 13, 2004 at 12:17 AM
Hey, that's cool. I would like to use aluminum, but that's one material that I don't have immediate access to, nor the welding equipment. It would be a lot, lot easier to work with too. But they had a big fire in the kiln at work after I left last night (no injuries other than some smoke inhalation), so we'll be working on rebuilding for a little bit, which means any "Government" jobs are on hold for a while. I'll still let you know when/if I do it.

-------------
You'd better get me out of this lord... or else you'll have me to deal with. -- Hunter S. Thompson "F.A.L.I.L.V."




Posted By: forbidden
Date Posted: October 13, 2004 at 12:23 AM
Coat the inside of the box with Rhinolining, should come out nice and acoustically dead (or damn close to it).

-------------
Top Secret, I can tell you but then my wife will kill me.




Posted By: chevyman26
Date Posted: October 13, 2004 at 12:56 AM
Hey thanks! Good thinking! (but then I guess you aren't a platinum member for nothing!) That will be a lot easier, faster, lighter, and most of all, cheaper than the industrial resin, which isn't included in the "scraps privileges."  Anyone interested in this resin - here is some more info on it - https://www.micsa.gr/chockfast/618e.htm

-------------
You'd better get me out of this lord... or else you'll have me to deal with. -- Hunter S. Thompson "F.A.L.I.L.V."




Posted By: heavilymedicate
Date Posted: October 13, 2004 at 10:38 AM
Car undercoating is cheap and stays semi-soft, never dries rock hard.  I would think it would be better then Rhinolining, that dries hard and plastic like on the surface.  Not to contradict Forbidden, I totally respect what he has to say.





Print Page | Close Window