Print Page | Close Window

Alpine CDA-9855 Versus Kenwood Excelon KD

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=49964
Printed Date: April 30, 2024 at 11:16 AM


Topic: Alpine CDA-9855 Versus Kenwood Excelon KD

Posted By: CTsommers
Subject: Alpine CDA-9855 Versus Kenwood Excelon KD
Date Posted: February 12, 2005 at 4:48 PM

I am looking to buy one of these two head units for my Mazda 3. Both of them are the top of the line from these two companies and both have some opinions not found on the other. The Alpine has the ability to control the apple Ipod from the head unit. While the Kenwood has 5 volt out puts while the alpine has 4 volt. Kenwood plays AAC format. Also has HD FM, AM radio.

Key Features: Kenwood
     
» CD receiver with built-in amplifier (22 watts RMS/50 peak x 4 channels)     
»"auto-slide" motorized, detachable face with fine-dot 3-D multicolor FL display     
»plays CDs, CD-Rs, and CD-RWs (including discs loaded with MP3, WMA, or AAC files)     
»SRS WOW sound enhancements (raises the soundstage, improves imaging, and strengthens bass)     
» System Q EX Sound Control (6 EQ presets, speaker size matching, and 4-band parametric EQ)     
»Digital E's+ crossover system     
»Advanced Codec (AC) Drive with Voice Index on Tap gives verbal confirmation of digital music file and folder names     
» satellite radio controls (SIRIUS or XM subscription, tuner, and antenna required to receive the satellite radio signal) — service is available only in the lower 48 states, not available in Alaska, Hawaii, or U.S. territories     
» HD Radio-ready (will control Kenwood's HD Radio tuner)     
» CD changer controls     
» dual-zone audio control     
» 5-volt front, rear, and subwoofer preamp outputs     
» Amplifier Management System (AMS) — provides remote control over compatible Kenwood Excelon amplifiers     
» ODD (Offset Dual Differential) 24-bit digital-to-audio converter system for improved sound     
» wireless remote     
» clock     
» CD frequency response 10-20,000 Hz     
» CD signal-to-noise ratio 110 dB     
» FM sensitivity 9.3 dBf     
» warranty: 3 years

Key Features: Alpine
» CD receiver with built-in amplifier (18 watts RMS/50 peak x 4 channels)     
» detachable, fold-down face with GlideTouch controls and BioLite display     
» plays audio CDs, CD-Rs and CD-RWs, plus discs burned with MP3 and WMA files     
» Bass Engine Pro sound controls with iPersonalize setup options     
» MediaXpander (restores clarity and detail to compressed or broadcast audio)     
» MaxTune SQ tuner     
» 12 FM/6 AM presets     
» satellite radio controls (SIRIUS or XM subscription, tuner, and antenna required to receive the satellite radio signal)     
» CD changer controls for Alpine Ai-NET changers only     
» compatible with Alpine's iPod interface adapter     
» 4-volt front, rear and subwoofer preamp outputs     
» Amplifier Link — can control up to 12 Alpine V12 external amps     
» clock     
» wireless remote     
» CEA-2006 compliant amplifier     
» CD frequency response: 5-20,000 Hz     
» CD signal-to-noise ratio: 105 dB     
» FM sensitivity: 9.3 dBf     
» warranty: 1 year


-------------
Chris
Mazda3



Replies:

Posted By: Drewt
Date Posted: February 12, 2005 at 7:38 PM

I'd go with the Alpine.  I just find that alpine has better build quality than kenwood....

Your gonna love either one!

-Drew





Posted By: CTsommers
Date Posted: February 13, 2005 at 4:28 PM
Yeah, that's what I thought too. But i do know that back in the day Kenwood was viewed as a upper end headunit

-------------
Chris
Mazda3




Posted By: Alpine Guy
Date Posted: February 13, 2005 at 4:37 PM
nooo, i don't believe kenwood ever had a 1 up on alpine actually.

-------------
2003 Chevy Avalanche,Eclipse CD7000,Morel Elate 5,Adire Extremis,Alpine PDX-4.150, 15" TC-3000, 2 Alpine PDX-1.1000, 470Amp HO Alt.




Posted By: gladbach
Date Posted: April 06, 2005 at 10:15 PM
also, correct me if I'm wrong, but hd radio ready is europe only??

and yeah, i'd take the alpine. that glide pad looks sweet.




Posted By: Alpine Guy
Date Posted: April 06, 2005 at 10:22 PM

I think theres a few HD stations in the US, its not as big as sirius or XM yet tho.



-------------
2003 Chevy Avalanche,Eclipse CD7000,Morel Elate 5,Adire Extremis,Alpine PDX-4.150, 15" TC-3000, 2 Alpine PDX-1.1000, 470Amp HO Alt.




Posted By: boulderguy
Date Posted: April 17, 2005 at 10:36 AM

I don't know that the build quality is better on either without taking them apart.  I do know that the difference in output voltages is negligible.  The marketing would like you to believe more is better, but they'll both have a clean signal & unless you're picking up all kinds of noise between your headunit & amps, you'll never hear the difference.

It's going to come down to features that you use regularly & how intuitive the interface is - which one is easier to use?  given that the sound quality's about the same on both, this is what it will boil down to.





Posted By: pimpincavy
Date Posted: April 17, 2005 at 11:46 AM
I would go with the Alpine, kenwood tends to be a little lower quality then alpine, eclipse and pioneer.

-------------




Posted By: bryceyaworsky
Date Posted: April 17, 2005 at 12:15 PM
if you're going to be spending some money on a head unit, check out the eclipse CD5435 or the CD8445.  These HU's are in a totally different league than alpine or kenwood.




Posted By: auex
Date Posted: April 17, 2005 at 3:11 PM
I would go with the kenwood out of those two choices. Don't make me slap you alpine guy.

-------------
Certified Security Specialist
Always check info with a digital multimeter.
I promise to be good.
Tell Darwin I sent you.

I've been sick lately, sorry I won't be on much.




Posted By: gladbach
Date Posted: April 17, 2005 at 8:16 PM
alpine.   the only reason not to might be the 5 volt preouts on the kenwood.   its not so much signal clarity, but rather the ability to turn the gain up higher on your amps before distortion kicks in.

also, I'm just ticked at alpine for dropping its 4volt preouts on all except their highest end few units... their typeR components look like they took a downward spiral as well... best buy is the devil.

kev




Posted By: pimpincavy
Date Posted: April 17, 2005 at 8:53 PM
Although the kenwood says it has 5V preouts, what they consider 5V might not be true 5V. With Alpine you know the decks are actually putting out 4V. I agreewith gladbach tough, it sucks that alpine decided to go with 2V on all but the 9855, however I have heard that their 2V decks sound really good for having a low preout voltage.

-------------




Posted By: kjatct
Date Posted: April 22, 2005 at 8:48 AM
I just installed the Alpine CDA-9855 with the ipod adapter. This headunit is awsome! The ipod interface is also verywell done. The crossover on the HU is very nice and you have the ability to use a 2 or 3way speaker setup via a switch on the bottom of the unit. The anly complaint I have is the ipersonalize feature does not seem to be working, however Alpine just added this HU to the ipersonalize site just a week ago.  Go with the Alpine.

-------------
James S.




Posted By: CTsommers
Date Posted: April 22, 2005 at 3:11 PM
Yeah, without uncertainty I am going to go with the Alpine 9855. The ipod interface is the major selling point. Kjatct does the control strip make going through songs, and play lists faster than last years models that used ipod interface?

-------------
Chris
Mazda3




Posted By: boulderguy
Date Posted: April 22, 2005 at 9:19 PM

I tried the 9835 with the Ipod adapter & was bitterly disappointed with the results, specifically the lack of ability to search for something without running over a kid in the street.  I just switched to the 9855, these are some thoughts I posted to another site that may help you decide.

The display has improved over the 9835, makes searching easier. Still won't display Artist/Song combo - what's up with that? Doesn't gray-out 2 of 3 songs in search list anymore, thank the Lord.

Searching is NOTICABLY faster now. It now will jump thru tracks very fast - up to 60 at a time - but there's a trade-off. Using the Glidestrip speeds things up, but you lose some precision when trying to lock onto a certain folder. This may improve as I get more accustomed to using this Glidestrip thingy, as I'm pretty clumsy with it so far.

As for usability, I could still run over a kid looking for something if I'm not careful - it sucks my attention that way. Just not nearly as bad as last year's model. Had they allowed for fast searching with the Glidestrip & also precise searching with the volume/rotary knob we'd be golden. Next year?

Scrolling thru 20GB of music on the iPod & locating a particular album probably takes twice as long compared to just using the iPod. Again, I expect this to improve. Even if it didn't, the ability to skip tracks thru my steering wheel controls makes up for it, IMO. Also not having to hit "play" on the iPod everytime I get back in the car is a bonus.

This Glidestrip is awkward so far, but getting better. Not as mindless as a laptop's integrated mouse touchpad, but it may just take some getting used to. Jury's out.

Sound quality from the iPod is as good as it gets. Alpine's come a long way in this respect, I'd put them just behind Eclipse & Nakamichi in sound quality. That's pretty good.

Conclusions - it still ain't the cat's meow, but much better than last year. I'm going to keep the KCA-420i for now over using the AUX-IN, I think it's useful enough to overcome any shortfalls. The headunit also has a port in the back to plug in a 3.5mm headphone jack to accept steering wheel controls - a godsend.

I may post an update after I'm more fluid with it all.





Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: April 22, 2005 at 9:24 PM

Some of you may remember me cautioning against the new 9855's for problematic reasons.  However, it seems no other shop in our area have experienced these.  Luckily, the one I installed never returned bad.

I'd have to say customers do like the Ipod interface, but the touch strip takes time getting used to- and you can forget about it if you have fat fingers.  I've always been a big Alpine fan in the past, but I think I'd lean towards the Kenwood on this one.



-------------
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.




Posted By: tcss
Date Posted: April 23, 2005 at 2:52 PM
One thing I've noticed that no one has mentioned ( I sell both ), The Kenwood when playing CDs SOUNDS BETTER. The 24 bit Burr Brown DAC is far superior to Alpines 1 bit in house DAC. I've done the AB comparisons on my display board with the same amps and speakers. Notice what kind of DAC is on the Alpine F #1 status deck? That's right, 24 bit Burr Brown. Check the sound out for your selves.




Posted By: chimaerax
Date Posted: May 01, 2005 at 8:50 PM
I have had this experience with both the CDA 9855 and the CDA 9853 - It mayhave issues when installed with a Terk XM hookup. The issues I have seen with these is that the Glide Touch Bar will appear to be locked down, like it is constantly being pressed in, making the head unit all but unusable.


I love Alpine's but there are issues with the 9855 and 9853's.




Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: May 01, 2005 at 9:35 PM
Well, my customer with the 9855 did return infact with problems.  The salesguy told me that no other shops in the area had these problems- according to Alpine!  So I'm sure these problematic decks are everywhere.

-------------
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.




Posted By: hammondc
Date Posted: May 25, 2005 at 4:16 PM
I suppose I will wait and compare the Alpine units to the Pioneer units (but the Pioneers are SOOOOO ugly). The IPOD interface is the #1 requirement for me right now. I also agree that Alpine took a dive this time around. I really wish eclipse would do an IPOD interface. I always had Eclipse units before my current Alpine. The IPOD is the only reason I changed. Can't say that I am completely thrilled with Alpine. The Ipersonalize is very hard to work with because you cannot listen as you adjust. Adjusting EQ/Xover in the car is just a pain in the a**. I am definitely looking for something way simpler next time around.  

-------------




Posted By: bazzgazm
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 11:10 AM

welp, as a person who made that choice...

the glide touch looks really appealing. but.. =) did you try it out? after a while it became more annoying than helpful, starts skipping and eventually  seems problematic.

i have an alpine 7840 right now i've used for years. and replaced with a kenwood mp828 (similar to the excelon, not as long on the warranty) but this unit is VERY, VERY impressive from where kenwood stood in my eyes before. Again. price is the deciding factor for anyone buying alpine/kenwood/sony/pioneer. and i'll vote that the gentlemen who mentioned eclipse being a step above.. right on. same with nakamichi and denon. just all around better units. but not as feature friendly or as attractive (w/ naka & denon) anyways. I'd have to vote personally on the kenwood in the long run, easy to operate and tons of fun features.





Posted By: fuseblower
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 12:51 PM
Kenwood all the way, abundace of features low price tag and durable...




Posted By: dedlyjedly
Date Posted: May 30, 2005 at 5:51 PM

kenwood excelon, hands down.  this year's excelon is much better than any kenwood you've ever experienced.  as mentioned before the 24 bit burrbrown (all 4 of 'em!) dac's are very nice (although not as nice as those in the f#1 product).  and i'll tell ya, they sound great.   i'm not sure on the alpine preout impedance but the kenwood are  5 volt/ 80 ohm. (you really need to analyze votage and impedance togethor to know the equipment's capabilities!). also not mentioned is the fact that the excelon has non-volatile memory options so you don't have to setup the dsp everytime your battery dies.  you've also got 3 lines of displayable text to go along with your compressed media and satellite radio.

i may be reading this wrong, but it seems as if noone here knows that kenwood also has an ipod adapter.  even more so, everyone complains about how the control features are set up w/ all of the manufacturer's control devices.  why not use the built in auxilliary input and use the ipod itself for control.

or better yet, leave your headphones plugged into your ipod and rip 20+gigs of music to your kenwood musickeg.  this is a harddrive designed specifically for the mobile environment and overcomes a lot of the issues people have w/ their ipod controllers.

although well built, and dependable, alpine is not necessarily the top-performer these days.



-------------
MECP certified, 5yrs experience, you probably otta listen bitch!!




Posted By: txaggiemp
Date Posted: May 30, 2005 at 6:19 PM
if you get the new alpine make sure that it is the new stock that has been cleared by alpine. the 05 swingface decks have been having a problem with the motors not working, so you might get stuck with a non-opening face. i'd also check to see if like the new glide touch feature, its not for everyone. i'm a die hard alpine fan but they are worrying a me a little this year.

-------------
the customer is not always right





Print Page | Close Window