Print Page | Close Window

Reverse sub mounting question.

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=54944
Printed Date: May 21, 2024 at 10:13 AM


Topic: Reverse sub mounting question.

Posted By: 95Pony
Subject: Reverse sub mounting question.
Date Posted: May 01, 2005 at 10:29 PM

Ok, you know when you see all the show cars and demo vehicles and everything and theyll always have there subs(or at least one of them) reverse mounted. My question is: whats the difference? Do you get the same performance out of the sub? Or is it just for show and actually does compromise SPL and SQ and make it not as efficient? Thanks!! (Sorry if this topic has been covered and exhausted!!)



Replies:

Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: May 01, 2005 at 10:41 PM
Usually this is just for looks, but if you have an undersized box, this can afford you some extra air space.  You don't really have to worry as much about puncturing the cones, either.  If you plan on doing this, with multiple woofers, be sure you wire them so they'll all push the same way, and avoid cancellation.

-------------
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.




Posted By: 95Pony
Date Posted: May 01, 2005 at 10:44 PM
What do you mean "so they all push the same way? and avoid cancellation" I have 2 DVC rockford HE2's that i would run in series or parallel would they be going the same way that way?




Posted By: Francious70
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 12:37 AM
If one sub moves in, whilst the other moves out, the sound waves will cancel each other out, resulting in a net of 0 volume.

Paul




Posted By: Ravendarat
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 1:05 AM
would you be looking at mounting one or both inverted?

-------------
double-secret reverse-osmosis speaker-cone-induced high-level interference distortion, Its a killer




Posted By: auex
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 1:19 AM
If you mount one sub correctly and one inverted then you would wire one of the subs out of phase so that they move in the same directions at the same time.

Pro's - Looks, cooling, depth issues within box.

Con's - Small loss of cone area (ie less potential output), possible damage to motor assembly, possible sealing issues(you can flip the rubber gasket the sub came with and disregard this), and a couple others.

Now there is no reason not to go ahead and invert your subs, I usually have one of mine inverted because I like the look and only one time did one of the speaker leads come off the post.

-------------
Certified Security Specialist
Always check info with a digital multimeter.
I promise to be good.
Tell Darwin I sent you.

I've been sick lately, sorry I won't be on much.




Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 5:38 AM

Example of reverse polarity on an inverted DVC sub using typical series/parallel wiring (the one in the middle is inverted between two normally mounted subs):

posted_image

This type of wiring can get tricky because of a lot of factors:  number of subs in all, number that are inverted, the confusion factor caused by dual voice coils, etc.  Let the forum know what you plan to do and we'll look over your wiring.

Here's a representation of what an inverse-mounted sub does to the relationship of air volume in the enclosure:

posted_image

So that means in order to keep the volumes of air for each sub the same, you would have to use some solid fill in the inverse-mounted chamber because of the added air volume caused by reversing the sub.  Or build the one chamber that much smaller right from the start.  Or....if all subs share the same air space, calculate the whole volume to compensate for the inverse mounting.



-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: mikew04
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 11:39 AM
Is there any noticible difference because of the smaller cone area?

-------------
6th gen Celica | Alpine CDA-9827 | Pioneer GMX962 | CDT CL components | JBL 600.1 | Infinity Reference 12




Posted By: DYohn
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 2:44 PM

mikew04 wrote:

Is there any noticible difference because of the smaller cone area?

Smaller cone area?



-------------
Support the12volt.com




Posted By: mikew04
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 3:41 PM
auex]I wrote:

you mount one sub correctly and one inverted then you would wire one of the subs out of phase so that they move in the same directions at the same time.

Pro's - Looks, cooling, depth issues within box.

Con's - Small loss of cone area (ie less potential output), possible damage to motor assembly, possible sealing issues(you can flip the rubber gasket the sub came with and disregard this), and a couple others.

Now there is no reason not to go ahead and invert your subs, I usually have one of mine inverted because I like the look and only one time did one of the speaker leads come off the post.


-------------
6th gen Celica | Alpine CDA-9827 | Pioneer GMX962 | CDT CL components | JBL 600.1 | Infinity Reference 12




Posted By: racer427
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 6:27 PM

Ok, not to be a thread theif, how many DB's could you potentially loose if you mounted both of your subs inverse? And how much effect will it have on SQ?

Chris



-------------
Alpine CDA-9833 HU
Diamond Audio M661 Components
MTX Thunder T6.6 Components:rear fill:
Cadence Q400 4 Channel Mains + rears
Thunder 801D Subs
MTX 1004 10's
Dual 4g wire to rear
4g grounds




Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 8:17 PM

If you have a great driver and a well-built, properly sized enclosure, then loss of SQ should not be a concern.  There are some tight situations where the only way to build the sub is to invert it because of space limitations...in SQ systems.  IIRC S. Kephart has something like that in the front of his car, and he's all about SQ as you all know.  And if using enough power, loss of db's wouldn't be an issue either.  I've not heard of any complaints where someone inverted two of three (or so) subs, had the air volume corrected to compensate...and noticed a reduction if db's after doing so.

I'm of the opinion, however, that in most cases of sub inversion, the purpose is to show off the rear end of the driver.  That's not SQ talking. 

posted_image



-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: 95Pony
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 9:47 PM

Ok, well thanks for all of the input everyone, but i got kind of lost and that diagram while it was cool, totally went over my head. I am building a fiberglass enclosure and just for sh*t's and giggles i inverted them to see how it would look and i just wondered if theyd put out the same and stuff. Here is what i did *****NOTE: The enclosure is NOT finished yet, that shot is with ONLY resined fleece**** So, if I installed these two just like this, would there be any problems? Thanks!!

posted_image





Posted By: customsuburb
Date Posted: May 02, 2005 at 9:57 PM

If you have both of them inverted then you can wire them normally at the woofers and just switch the main positive and negative wires at the amp.

When you're done, if you want to hide the wires better you can use one or two of the holes for mounting the woofer to run the wire through. Make sure to seal it up though.



-------------




Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: May 03, 2005 at 7:34 AM

It'll probably flex, and not sound right.  Throw some fiberglass on it until it doesn't flex, then use some body filler to get it smooth.



-------------
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.




Posted By: Damion
Date Posted: May 03, 2005 at 11:06 AM
so does wiring one woofer out of phase make a difference on the load the amp sees?? ( 4ohm load with drivers mounted normally , will it still be a 4ohm load?? )




Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: May 03, 2005 at 8:24 PM
No, it'll be the same load on the amp.

-------------
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.





Print Page | Close Window