Print Page | Close Window

Quick Line Converter Question

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=55147
Printed Date: April 28, 2024 at 5:04 PM


Topic: Quick Line Converter Question

Posted By: ajbringle
Subject: Quick Line Converter Question
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 8:09 PM

I have to install a 2 channel amp w/ line converter and just want to know if I should use both the front and rear L/R into the converer, or only the front OR rear off the stock HU.



Replies:

Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 8:43 PM

I know this is a simple question but I just want a second opinion.  Can anyone help me out before I go out the garage and start tearing apart the dash.    Once I start I generally like to finish in one fel swoop.





Posted By: mobileworks
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 8:48 PM

If your line out converter has four inputs then I would just tie into the rears or just the fronts.  Now most line out converters are only two channel in which case just wire it up to the rears.

Does that help?



-------------




Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 8:52 PM

Maybe a bit more info will help...

The factory HU doesn't have RCA output so I have to use a line level converter because my amp doesn't have line inputs (only RCA).

The amp is a 2 channel and I am going to install into a dakota w/ 4 drivers.  I just want to know if I have to connect both the front AND rear lines out of the HU to the line converter or if can use only the front OR rear.

Stereo is stereo right?  I just a simple left and right channel to input then i will connect the outputs so I will effectivly drive 4 channels from 2. I know I will lose "Fade" on the HU, but thats the price I pay for being to cheap to buy a new 4 Channel .

Any help would be nice.





Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 8:59 PM

Mobileworks  do you see what I am getting at.  Is it necessary to tie all four outputs from the HU to the 2 inputs of the line conv?  It is a 2 channel conv. I just don't want to overload it or "dirty" up the signal to the amp. 

It is my understanding that there is no diff. between the front and rear channels.  They are both "stereo"  so in theory either one would be enough to feed the conv. which will send to the amp (2 channel), which will be wired to all 4 drivers in my turck.





Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 8:59 PM

Use just one of either.  Front is better because you will still want to fade the rear speakers out some and this fading (attenuation) won't also attenuate what you have hooked up at the amp.  By tapping into the OEM speaker wires, you will pick up voltage for signal input to the amp.  If the OEM wires are still connected to the speakers, they will be powered with deck power.

A speaker load on an amp, be it the deck or the aftermarket amp, will cause the amp to produce power.  No load, no power.  If the speakers are powered by the new amp, the deck will still function as normal but will not produce power.

So what do you mean by saying you want to "boost" the stock head unit?  Either the head unit will be connected to speakers and provide the power...or the amp will be connected to speakers and provide the power.  Not both to the same speakers.



-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:03 PM

I am going to use the amp to drive all 4 drivers,  not the HU.  The amp has RCA input and the HU doesn't have RCA Output so the conv. is the only way to get the signal to the amp.

Since I am using a 2 channel amp to power fron the rear speakers I won't have Fade anyway, only Balance no?





Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:11 PM
You have a two channel amp, so a two channel LOC is appropriate.  However, it is not appropriate to connect two sets of speakers to a two channel amp...it can be done but there is this thing called SQ to be concerned with.  Best bet in your situation is to power the front speakers with the amp and leave the rear speakers connected to the deck for their power,

-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:18 PM

I am assuming SQ is sound quality, and I see your point.   I just don't want to splurge on a new 4 channel  becuase I have the 2 ch. laying around collecting duet.

This no comp. stereo it just my daily driver... a dodge dakota.  I don't have any sups, just want to up the SQ.

Still advise the same approach.?  Will powering just the rears make the HU more effective for those drivers (probably).?





Posted By: customsuburb
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:39 PM
There will be more distortion at 2 ohms (which is the load the two sets of speakers would put on each channel of your amp). Just power the rear speakers with the deck power. They should only be for rear fill anyways.




Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:39 PM

You want to be able to fade, especially in a truck cab.  You also want the front soundstage to be as high of quality as possible.  The best speakers should be in front, and lesser ones can take up the rear.  It is very common for a beginner to try to get as much as he can with starter gear and connect more speakers together than he should.  You might, too, and I did as well.  But when you do change it, as you will, to what I suggested...you will notice a great improvement in the quality of the overall sound.

And for the last question, no.  The deck will not produce more power into the rears because the fronts are disconnected.  It's still running two channels... the same two channels, to the rears.



-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:50 PM

Stevedart...

Although I have several installs under my belt, I am no pro, (just an avid jack of all trades... master off none) thats why I come to places like this before I attempt something.  So as both you and another have pointed out 4 ohms up front is far better than 2 front and rear.   That is something I totally forgot about when I planed this.

Again thanx to you and anyone else that replied to my post. 





Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 04, 2005 at 9:55 PM

Customsubub...

Thanks to you too, I had obviously forgt my parallel Ohms law.

I will leave enough wire in the dash to switch it when I get a 4 Ch.





Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 05, 2005 at 6:02 PM

Well got done with the install earlier today and have to say that I am pleased with the end result.

I did as suggested and ran the amp to the front channel and powered the rears off the HU.

The only complaint I have is the 100x2  is so strong that my gain is barely off the lowest setting maybe 1/32 off a turn.  If I put it to even a 1/4 it is so strong that I can't even hear the rear fill.  Although there is no distortion, like it would have been had I tied the rears into the front channel.

One more question for Stevdart (or anyone), if I were to have tied front and rear together @2 ohms, and my amp is 2 ohm stable,  would there have been that much distortion?





Posted By: mobileworks
Date Posted: May 05, 2005 at 6:35 PM

The distortion from running the fronts and rears together would be very little.  All this talk of 2 ohms and 4 ohms has little to do with a speaker when its actually working (playing music)

You see when a speaker is producing music (moving in and out) the impedance of the speaker changes with the frequency that its trying to play.  In some cases the impedance can reach a couple of hundred ohms, so even if you tied them together and added another 4 ohm speaker to the same channel, your amp is usually capable of playing with no problems.  This typically true of interior speakers and although the same rules apply to any speaker (even woofers) I would be a little more causious when doing it with your subs.

Run those rears of that amp and get some real sound pumping in that cab.

Just my 2 cents.



-------------




Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: May 05, 2005 at 10:00 PM

ajbringle wrote:

would there have been that much distortion?

I don't believe that I or anyone else used the word "distortion" in describing the difference of sound quality here.  Distortion would not have been an issue.  I know that when I first put 4 coaxials into my car and ran them off of two channels at 2 ohms I thought they sounded good.  But it always sounds better when you have installed new speakers and an amp. 

But when I upgraded to a separate amp for the sub and ran the 4 off of 4 channels, the higher quality of sound was immediately recognizable.  I attenuate the rears to such a level that the fronts are heard most even sitting in the rear seat.  In a truck, sound from behind should be almost nonexistant...there are no back seat passengers.

You're the captain.  Try it both ways.



-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: ajbringle
Date Posted: May 06, 2005 at 2:50 PM

Well, for now I will leave it be since I just got done battoning everything together.  Someday soon I will be replacing the stock speakers anyway, then mabe I will cutt the harness apart and splice the F and R together just to see how it sounds.

Anyway the point is to have better sound than when you started the project, AND IT IS...  in my opinion a win win sit.

Thanks again Stevedart, and Mobileworks.





Posted By: WzUpSon
Date Posted: May 07, 2005 at 7:02 PM
ajbringle
What's up, Son!!!!


-------------
What's Up Son??





Print Page | Close Window