Print Page | Close Window

L7 or W3v2

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=56299
Printed Date: April 25, 2024 at 2:20 AM


Topic: L7 or W3v2

Posted By: jl_tulane
Subject: L7 or W3v2
Date Posted: May 23, 2005 at 5:02 PM

Ok I have an extended cab silverado and a box that downfires two 12's underneath the back seat.  The enclosure volume is pretty small (about 0.75 cu. ft. per chamber). Right now I have a Rockford Fosgate 500bd pushing 2 JLW3Vv2's wired in series/parallel at a total of 2 ohms.

My question is this:  I know the solobaric Kicker 12's require about 0.88 cu. ft. as opposed to the JL's which call for about 1.3.  Would I get better bass response if I go out and get the L7's?  Also, at cardomain, I can get factory remanufactured L7's for about $160 each, should I even try to invest in factory remans?

FYI, I am looking for as good SPL as I can get with a setup similar to this. Any help would be appreciated.




Replies:

Posted By: jeffchilcott
Date Posted: May 23, 2005 at 5:38 PM
l7's would produce more SPL and be more boomy, but would sound like poop in a open cargo vehicle.   I am not a big fan of them

-------------
2009 0-1000 Trunk WR 154.0DB 2009 1001+ Trunk WR
2007 USACI World Champion
2007 World Record
2006 USACI Finals 2nd Place




Posted By: racer427
Date Posted: May 23, 2005 at 8:42 PM

I would stick with the W3's if you want SQ. The Kicker L7's and L5's and mainly SPL subs.

Chris



-------------
Alpine CDA-9833 HU
Diamond Audio M661 Components
MTX Thunder T6.6 Components:rear fill:
Cadence Q400 4 Channel Mains + rears
Thunder 801D Subs
MTX 1004 10's
Dual 4g wire to rear
4g grounds




Posted By: sedate
Date Posted: May 24, 2005 at 12:54 AM

Uhh.  OK if my girlfriend hadn't kicked me out I'd be on my *own* computer right now and I'd model them in WinISD, post the graph, and show you how goofy the thought of replacing *JL-W3* subs with Kicker-L-whatever is. 

jl_tulane, manufacters do *not* recommend box sizes based on anything like *sound quality*... they recommend box sizes based a complex series of trade-offs... marketability, SPL v SQ to the average consumer, etc... you'd be amazed how *awful* a manufacturers box-specs actually are in *so many* cases.  Do not read the recommended sealed-box volume and decide one sub is better than the other.  It is MUCH more complicated than that.

Now, if you like SPL and SQ w/o breaking the bank in a super-small box and wanna blow away a W3?

Clearly, you haven't heard the greatest subwoofer ever released to the mass-market, the Infinity Kappa Perfect 12.1.  Go on back to Sounddomain.com, and slide on over and pick urself up two of those.  They *will* sound better than Kicker-anything and *will* be louder and cleaner than a JLW3. 

If you really mean, "I am looking for as good SPL as I can get with a setup similar to this. Any help would be appreciated."

Three words:  Infinity Kappa Perfect.



-------------
"I'm finished!" - Daniel Plainview




Posted By: jeffchilcott
Date Posted: May 24, 2005 at 6:45 AM
I will also recomend the eclipse aluminums, they are great sounding, and in a ported box we were able to pull 143.6db in a trunk vehicle.   measurment were on the term lab.     They did 138.2 in a sealed enclosure

-------------
2009 0-1000 Trunk WR 154.0DB 2009 1001+ Trunk WR
2007 USACI World Champion
2007 World Record
2006 USACI Finals 2nd Place




Posted By: soundmasta
Date Posted: May 25, 2005 at 8:00 AM

i don't  understand whats wrong with you ass clowns that think that the solo barics sound like crap...i just don't get it. have you heard them in a professionally installed system? they might not be the best sounding subs ever, but i've hood up so many and never been dissappointed. they play great tight accurate bass. very loudly. every one seems to have some oddball conception that tye CAN"T sound good either because they work at a jl audio dealer or because the subs are square. most people that don't like their sound havn't even heard them. piss off.

anyways...now that i have vented. put two L7 12's in .88 cu ft boxes, w/ 50% polyfill and about 1000 watts strong rms power and ****in' rock out. you'll love it. 



-------------




Posted By: audiobass10
Date Posted: May 25, 2005 at 11:37 AM
L7's aren't bad woofs at all IMO. The only downfall is the design which causes the tinsel leads to snap quite regularaly, although i know plenty of people who have never had problems with them. Infinity doesn't really make any loud subs, including the Kappa Perfects. They're not good SPL woofers at all really..so I don't understand that. You're not gunna find a sub louder than the L7 in its price range period. I'm sure you could give em .88 cu ft each, but I would definitely go much larger. Around 7-8 cubes for two if you've got the space. Manufacturers reccomendations don't mean sh**.

-------------
Dave

Pioneer Premier DEH-P660
15" Kicker CVR
Profile AP1000M
It's Loud




Posted By: soundmasta
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 7:30 AM

audiobass10 wrote:

Infinity doesn't really make any loud subs, including the Kappa Perfects.

exactally.

and as for using 7 or 8 cubes for the two subs, well they will slam in a ported box that size, probably harder than you'd ever hope for, but they play loud as hell in a small sealed to. lets not forget what the solobaric was designed for...and if you don't know, i'll explain later.





Posted By: draggindakota
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 8:00 AM
4 '01 model s10L7's w/0.75 cu ft each in an extended cab dakota. Sounded GREAT! With 300 watts to each sub (they take 600w) I hit 141 flat on my first ever try at a bass comp. I've never been a fan of JL. I've installed many for people because they're pretty popular around here, but I don't like the way they sound. But, thats just my opinion. I say go with the kickers. Since they require less space, they will play a lot deeper and not sound so punchy in that size box.

-------------




Posted By: jl_tulane
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 3:39 PM

Part of my problem is I am limited in volume.  I want to keep my truck interior pretty much stock (not take out the back seat), but I want some good SPL.  I have had the JL's in there for a while and thought that being as how the manufacturer recommended a smaller volume for the kickers, they would hit harder.

I am pretty much torn.  I doubt I will go with anything else other than these two brands, but I don't want to wind up spending the money and having a system that sounds the same or worse than the one I have now.





Posted By: racer427
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 4:15 PM

I do believe the reason that you don't like the JL's right now is due to the fact that they are just in too small of an enclosure. I have been dealing with JL set-ups for many years and given the proper enclosure and power supply, they will rock hard.

Just one example: An install I did for a buddy of mine last year using 2 12W3's powered by a JL 500.1 in a 1.45 FT^3 sealed box. With that set-up he hit 138 on the meter and it sounded clean as hell as well.

Your problem sounds like space issues. Why not consider a set of good quality 10's that will require a smaller enclosure. the JL 10W3's require around .6-.9 Ft^3. I have personally set these up in a 1ft^3 sealed encloure in a Silverado extended cab and they rocked.

The choice is really up to you but, I thought that I would just stick in my 2 cents.

Chris



-------------
Alpine CDA-9833 HU
Diamond Audio M661 Components
MTX Thunder T6.6 Components:rear fill:
Cadence Q400 4 Channel Mains + rears
Thunder 801D Subs
MTX 1004 10's
Dual 4g wire to rear
4g grounds




Posted By: Nodestiny
Date Posted: May 26, 2005 at 4:35 PM
If you care not about distorted sounding bass, the L7's in your small sealed boxes would do fine for SPL. I had 2 of the first generation L7s in my 88 pulsar with 500 watts RMS each sealed with 1.1 cubes each and did 148.3 at the dash on the older termlab mic (so probably 142-144 on the new meter).

L7s have the ABILITY to have excelent SQ at the expense of a large box. I used to be a Kicker L7 fanboy until i threw in some High XMAX round subs, and then realized the L7s were not all that great as an SQ driver.

If you can find them, try out the Oz Audio Matrix Elite 10"s. In your space, .88 cubes each, you will find excelent lows, 25mm Xmax / 2.5" peak to peak will insure plenty of output, with 700 watts RMS (i have heard people putting 1000watts RMS into them easily), they have more cone area than your average high xmax sub (due to Uturn surround simular to the IDMAX)...

I would put a Matrix Elite sub VS any sub in the price range for either SQ or SPL anyday ;)

I would also venture to say that a 12" Matrix Elite VS a Kicker L7 12" would have simular outcome, since the extra Xmax of the ME will help to keep up to the extra cone area of the sub...

But when it comes to playing a 10Hz note in either one of these... i know my good ol ME's will deffen me far before the L7s will :D

-------------
04 dodge neon SXT
(2) Oz Audio Matrix Elite 12"s sealed in 4 cube fiberglass enclosure, powered by HiFonics BX1605D
Oz Audio Matrix 180cs 6.5" component set power by HiFonics ZX4000





Print Page | Close Window