power reference vs. mclass

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=60317
Printed Date: May 13, 2025 at 9:00 AM

Topic: power reference vs. mclass

Posted By: wrathchild281
Subject: power reference vs. mclass
Date Posted: July 28, 2005 at 11:51 PM

hey im not aware of the diference between these models from memphis when it comes to there co axial speakers. specifically the 6x9's. they both handle like 50 watts rms and the mclass are more expensive. does anybody know the difference? thanks

Replies:

Posted By: lwhite
Date Posted: July 29, 2005 at 12:23 AM

i'd rather pay the extra for the mclass since they seem to have better imaging, les distortion, polyurethane my be bullet proof but kevlar is more stable cone (doesnt warp as much).

good luck :)

-------------
kenwood 9023r
RF 800a2
1 pair fusion jona lomu 6.5" 2ohm (fjl-65c)
RF t5002
2x fusion powerplant 12" DVC sub (ported)(fpw-1200)

Posted By: DYohn
Date Posted: July 29, 2005 at 10:20 AM

The difference is the M-class is Memphis' higher end line and the PR is Memphis' mid-level line. M-class is considered to be better by the manufacturer. I like the sound of M-class more; some people prefer the sound of the PR line. It's a matter of taste.

-------------
Support the12volt.com

Posted By: wrathchild281
Date Posted: July 29, 2005 at 11:17 AM

ok thanks what do u think would play louder while given the same amount of power. im looking for loud piercing mids and highs.

Print Page | Close Window