Bench testing system w/scope and fn.gen
Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=68181
Printed Date: July 03, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Topic: Bench testing system w/scope and fn.gen
Posted By: slipnfall
Subject: Bench testing system w/scope and fn.gen
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 12:24 AM
Hi folks, It's been a while since I'v visited these boards; similarly I'v been out of the audio arena for some time also. I did a quick search on oscilloscope, and couldn't find a whole lot of details on bench testing... I use the term 'bench' loosly: I mean the components installed in a vehicle, but using bench equipment to test/set properly. I am pretty well versed in electronics, own a Tek. 465B scope, and 15Mhz arbitrary function generator, and some other goodies. Admittedly I don't have any electronic experiance with audio 'tuning'. Anyways, I'm working on getting my audio system in my Nissan 240sx back up to par, and would just like some tips, hints, or just general knowledge of what you folks do to fully utilize similar test equipment. To start, here is my intended setup(h/u only installed as of writing): please don't mind the small-powered setup, I just need something for now. :^: I think this will actually help the purpose of this thread(to help educate others as well), because it won't be cluttered with the confusion of 5 other in-line amp/processing devices. I'd like to keep this as basic and rudamentary as possible, for my sake and others. ;) Kenwood Excellon KDC-X569 headunit Infinity Reference 6020CS 6.5" in doors(undecided on amp to power these) Infinity BASSlink 12" all-in-one. Now to the nitty-gritty, with everything in place, RCA's, power, etc. Do you measure your noise floor/ceiling before proceeding(with car on)? Is it better to use a true(ie not burnt) test tone CD, or inject a signal directly into the RCA's for amp gain settings? If this is the case, I would obviously want to use the line-level pk-pk that my Kenwood outputs. Any other factors, ie should I assume an ideal 50ohm termination at the amp inputs? For a sub I imagine tweaking gain is a simply matter of increasing gain on the amp untill clipping or distortion is present on the oscilloscope. General rule is to keep gains as low as possible untill right before final amp stage, right?(to keep the signal-to-noise ratio low untill then). Now in regards to the Infinity cross-overs: is the procedure similar? Will measing rolloff rates and cuttoff frequencies of each x-over be of any benefit? I'll stop there for now, rather than trying to ask too many questions at once. Thanks for reading, any insite is greatly appreciated. -------------
Replies:
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 7:21 AM
sprahl85 wrote:
How bout you do it all by ear and see if you like it. It's not like you have uber high end equip to put all the effort into anyway.
That's fair, it might not seem like it's worth the effort for me to take... or is it not worth your effort to help me out on a small-sized system? Which ever the case may be, I just wanted to learn how to do it right. I have setup a dual 12" blaupunkt system before(in a custom box that I built), and I just always thought I could have always squeezed more out of them.(now I know I was severely limited by their digital amps). Anyways, my intentions were to learn the basics now while the system at hand is simple... -------------
Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 8:39 AM
With your gear you could do both the listening for the clipping signal and also look at it on the scope. The volume shouldn't be overwhelming for listening, although it is common to put ear plugs in when you're driving any system to full power. You can use a burned CD if you make it right. Do a search of this forum for "tone generator" and you'll see a thread I wrote that links to a good online program you can download. The key is to use sine waves recorded at 0 db. Use the tone to set the head unit output and also to set the amp gains to match. Other searches: "test tones" and "setting gain" or "gain" will yield more info written in the recent past on this subject. The general idea is to use a tone recorded at the highest possible level of signal strength (0 db) and set the units so that they are at full clean output at the same point. With the head unit, this will be a number on the volume level that you will know is the maximum you can ever turn it after you find the point of clipping. With the amp gain, it is to match the amp output to the head unit...so that when you turn volume up on the deck the amp will respond on a scale so that both peak simutaneously. When you get the deck volume up to that known limit you will know that anything beyond that will introduce clipping into the signal. The clipping would come from both the deck and the amp. You'll find more here: https://www.bcae1.com/ ------------- Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 3:41 PM
That's a great link you posted: let me take some time to digest it and get back to you. From what I'v been reading, you want to start by checking the h/u for clipping: I 'm a bit suprised that headunits are possible of doing so. You would think the manufacture would 'tune' the circuitry so that even at full-volume, it would be clean full-range output signal(weather it be 2V, 4V out, etc). IIRC the Kenwood is a 2V output, but I'm not sure off hand what the Infinity amp is.
Can you reccomend an affordable amp to power the front components? I'm looking at about 130Wpk per 4ch/4ohm each, correct?
Thanks again, I'll be sure to read through the above mentioned site.
Regards,
Jamie
-------------
Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 7:22 PM
For just the pair of front components? Use a two-channel amp rated at about 2 X 50 watts RMS. You could go higher to something like 2 X 65 watts if you find a good deal on something, but you'll most likely find the best selection in the 50 watt range. Check with your local installer shops and see if they have something they can hook you up with. Otherwise, there's a plethora of 2 channel amps on the web. Some common names to avoid are Pyle, well....this will take too much typing. Try this: go to this website https://www.ikesound.com/ Look at the list of name brands along the left side. Now, pick out Alpine, Blaupunkt, Clarion, Directed Audio, Hifonics, Infinity, JBL, JL Audio, Kenwood Exelon, Kicker, Lightning Audio, MB Quart, MTX, Orion, Phoenix Gold, Planet Audio, Precision Power, and Rockford Fosgate. Toss all the others, and I'm not sure all of these brands chosen from the list make amplifiers. There are, of course, other brands not seen here in the mid-price range that you could get a recommendation for... but you get the idea. There are probably twice as many you wouldn't want to part with your money for. If I left anybody out please accept my heartfelts. Not an endorsement of the above linked website. ------------- Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 8:07 PM
2ch, right... I don't know what I was thinking... for whatever reason I assumed that each component had its own cross-over, but it's one per set... will each channel of the amp see a 2 or 4-ohm load(the tweeter and mid are 4ohm each, but do they get paralleled?). Thx again. -------------
Posted By: dwarren
Date Posted: December 12, 2005 at 8:11 PM
With the supplied (infinity) x-over , the amp will see a 4 ohm load per channel. There are some infinty copmonents that have a net load of 2 ohms, but I do not think you have that model. -------------
Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: December 13, 2005 at 8:42 AM
A crossed-over component set (or a coaxial unit with a cap on the tweeter) works as a single 4 ohm unit. The crossover divides the frequencies between the components, so in effect there is only one 4 ohm component playing at a time. Mind you, these are very short time durations! But overall, the crossover maintains the 4 ohm impedance. The components are fed from the crossover, so there is no parallel or other wiring to be done between them. Additionally, the set of components is rated for their total power handling capacity as a set, not individually. This distribution of power is also a responsibility of the crossover. https://www.speakerworkshop.com/ is a great crossover design tool. Save this link for more study about the way these work. ------------- Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: December 14, 2005 at 2:04 AM
Hey thanks for all the great responses everyone, I appreciate the attention. I read practically all of the bcae1.com site(with the exception of the basic electronics stuff)...wow, lots of good info there. One part in particular has me, for lack of better terms, worried: Basic Car Audio Electronics(https://www.bcae1.com/gaincon2.htm) As you can see, the gain controls match the head unit to the amplifier. No single gain position is right for every head unit. There are many factors which must be taken into account when setting the gain controls in any audio system. Setting the gain controls so that the amplifiers were never driven into clipping with the 0dBfs 100hz test tone would likely leave you with a system which would not produce sufficient output with a typical music source. [/QUOTE wrote:
This is stated because typical music recordings are lower than 0dB, and compressed, correct? I do agree with the suggestions of 'tuning' with music *and* test tones... that being said it seems that setting the system up first with test tones is a mute point(haha, no pun intended. ), because I'll likely end up gaining up to make up for the lower-dB recordings. Of course I could look at the music on the scope, but I'm not sure how well clipping would be seen(as it is not a periodic signal, easy to trigge
This is stated because typical music recordings are lower than 0dB, and compressed, correct? I do agree with the suggestions of 'tuning' with music *and* test tones... that being said it seems that setting the system up first with test tones is a mute point(haha, no pun intended. ), because I'll likely end up gaining up to make up for the lower-dB recordings. Of course I could look at the music on the scope, but I'm not sure how well clipping would be seen(as it is not a periodic signal, easy to trigger on). Also from reading the 'Setting gains with a scope' section(heh, why didn't I find this earlier!), my 2V pre-out may be quite limiting for bass/trebble adjustments. They suggest using the fader to reduce the amplitude a bit, but I think my pre-outs are all non-fading(?). There seem to be some nifty features on this Kenwood deck, things I'm not used to seeing: Center frequency and Q adjustments(bass/mid/treb), Front high-pass filter, Rear high-pass filter, non-fading low-pass filter. I'm hoping those will be of some help when I get those Infinity's in(believe me, it'll be an upgrade from $19.99 4x6 Pyles) Regards, 'slip -------------
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: December 14, 2005 at 2:08 AM
oops, I fudged the quote...sorry
-------------
Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: December 14, 2005 at 8:29 AM
You WILL occasionally have recordings that are as loud as the reference 0 db level you set the system up to handle. I know I have made CDs that I downloaded and burned to disk that have reached those limits. And I can also think of some store-bought CDs that are at the threshold. So, no, it's not a moot point to set up the gains correctly. You are not supposed to set everything up by the book and then go and readjust them by using a music source. You might as well set up your system like a rookie to begin with if you're going to do that. The point being made at BCAE1 is that you are likely to find a lower level of output when playing most music sources than you found using the 0 db reference. That's a no-brainer. But this is also a no-brainer: buy a more powerful system if the output of what you are currently using is not loud enough. And....I will emphasize again that you should listen for the clipping signal as well as looking for it on the scope. You'll be surprised at how clearly you'll hear it using a sine wave. All for a well-rounded experience, and a way to double-check. Personally, I don't have a 'scope, so I double-check by reading voltage output and using Ohm's Law after I've listened for the clipping. Guess what? It's always on-the-money. ------------- Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: December 31, 2005 at 12:38 AM
stevdart wrote:
So, no, it's not a moot point to set up the gains correctly. You are not supposed to set everything up by the book and then go and readjust them by using a music source. You might as well set up your system like a rookie to begin with if you're going to do that.
Sorry for the long delay for a response, I'v been busy installing! Your explaination makes sense, thanks. I regretfully don't have my subs in yet, but did finally get my 6.5" Infninity components in. I still need to install the door panels, but I should have it wrapped up by tomorrow. I'm going to throw out some questions that have come up along the way. First, I used 1/4" lexan for the 6.5" adaptor plates(originally active 4x6" in the doors), and installed some dynomat(it was cheap) on the adaptor plate itself. Is this really going to do any good? Should I put the remaining on the surrounding door metal? I'm using a Clarion 50rms x 2 amp to power the components. Is it of any benefit to set the gains as we have talked about for mids/highs? IIRC, the cross-over is set to LP/HP 3.5kHz. Coming from an electronics background, I would have imagine reactance would come into play for the different frequencies. Also, since I do listed to a variety of music types, is it still best to output a flat response for this tuning(even though I may jack the bass, or treble for certain CD's)? Lastly, I'm not using my rear deck speakers... is it better for me to disconnect them and use '0' fade, or fade full front? Is the front RCA output level-shifted higher when full-front vs '0'? Thanks for reading, Jamie -------------
Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: December 31, 2005 at 8:10 AM
For the dynamat, if you have it- definitely do the metal of the doors. Yes, set the gains as stevdart posted. A 3.5 kHz crossover point, that sounds like the crossover from the mids to the highs, not the crossover on the amp. It'll be set to either LP or HP- high pas or low pass. Start with the same crossover point as your subs (if you're using any)- usually around 80 Hz, high pass instead of low pass. It's best to set the eq settings (bass/treble) before the gain. If set properly, you don't need to fool around with it after that. If you do, you may need to adjust the gains again because it can cause the signal to clip earlier. If you're not using your rear speakers, remove them to help allow the sub bass into your passenger compartment better. If you don't have a sub/subs it really doesn't matter. You won't gain anything from fading it all the way to the front- it'll only make the rears quieter- not the fronts any louder. ------------- My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: January 13, 2006 at 11:07 AM
Well my install is finally finished, for now. I had to replace some lower control arms and tie rods at the same time, which is why it was so delayed. Anyways, I chose a Clarion APA250 2/1 amp, rated for 50Wrms x2. 8AWG wire to the back, with 16awg rockford fosgate speaker wire(it was left-over from my girlfriends shop-install).
Anyways, the setup went well: I thought my Kenwood KDC569 only had 2V outputs, but I was seeing 3Vpk-pk at max. At max volume level(35), with flat eq I had severe clipping... Fortunately the headunit features a volume 'offet': I upped the treble and bass eq by two levels, turned LOUD on, and turned the volume offset up untill I didn't see any clipping. It took 8 levels(the max) of volume offset to cure any clipping. The source was a CD with various frequencies(mainly critical ones: min/max response freq's, crossover cuttoff freq, etc), made with 'Test Tone Generator'.
So after that I was able to get a clean sine wave output, even with the headunit cranked, any frequency. Output voltage was right at 2Vpk-pk. Then to the amp. It didn't take much twiddling of the gain to see clipping... in the end I was able to produce 20Vpk-pk, which by my calc's:
P=I^2*R => (20Vpk-pk/4ohm)^2*4ohm =>100W.
The speakers sound ok, but I don't know if it's the amp, or what, but the mid/bass seems muddy/muffled. I think I should have gone with a higher powered amp also: with it tuned properly, it isn't as loud as I would like, especially considering an aftermarket performance exhaust. I realize I gave myself some headroom in the tuning, so I may try backing off the volume offset to make up for lower-level recordings.
Now I really need a sub. :-)
-------------
Posted By: boardinbum
Date Posted: January 14, 2006 at 3:22 AM
Sounddomain has some really good prices on some nice Orion 2 channel amps if you're looking for something with a little more power. Check them out here
Posted By: slipnfall
Date Posted: January 14, 2006 at 10:11 AM
Well I just bought this amp, so I'll stick with it for a while. It only cost me $60 to my door from ebay, which I didn't think was too bad.... brand new 2005 model.
-------------
|