Print Page | Close Window

SQ amps

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=72813
Printed Date: May 16, 2024 at 8:21 PM


Topic: SQ amps

Posted By: kopeah
Subject: SQ amps
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 1:19 PM

Hi all,

Can anyone here recommend any good SQ amps. I'm not looking into something expensive like Brax or Helix amplifiers. :)
I was looking at MA Audio but I believe they are more into SPL, am I correct?

Thanks,




Replies:

Posted By: godblessdremil
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 1:28 PM
Well most people hate alphasonik because its owned by audiobahn but after last weeks install i am gonna say anything in the Z-series would be good for door speakers and what i use for mine. The abillity to fine tune each channel is really quite amazing. BUT!!! anything you will here is solely opinion just go hear it yourself.




Posted By: kopeah
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 2:28 PM
Any other good SQ amps out here? I think we need to have a sticky thread with a list of both recommended SQ and SPL amps.

:)






Posted By: boardinbum
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 2:39 PM
What do you need this sq amp for? What kind of speakers or subs are you wanting to run off of it




Posted By: kopeah
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 2:56 PM
Seas Lotus speakers and subs.





Posted By: kfr01
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 3:37 PM
Nice speakers.  What's your budget?  What watt target are you looking for?

-------------
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder




Posted By: haemphyst
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 4:50 PM
kopeah wrote:

Seas Lotus speakers and subs.


DON'T use MA Audio, then... bottom shelf turds, AFAIAC - ESPECIALLY for running highs...

Eclipse, AltoMobile Digitals, MTX... POSSIBLY Alpine, although not NEARLY what they used to be... Brands to avoid: Sony, Audiobahn (and ANY of that ilk), Kenwood (although better than others in this list), Rockford, Kicker, Pioneer...

QUALITY is FAR more important in a mids/highs amp than in a sub amp... spend REAL money on it to drive your obviously carefully chosen components.

-------------
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."




Posted By: kopeah
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 5:09 PM
How about Memphis and Precision Power? How good are they in terms of SQ ?







Posted By: kopeah
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 5:12 PM
I'm looking for a dual channel with at least 100W or 150W per channel for the speaker and about 500W for the subs. Budget wise, I don't want to spend 1k for one amplifier ..:)






Posted By: onedonut16
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 7:26 PM
Not sure about your budget, but since you're running highend separates I would recommend Xtant, Arc, or Zapco. All are pricey, but i have found that there is a huge difference between amps such as the ones i listed and more mainstream lines like RF, Kicker, Alpine,ect... I'm running quart qsd's with an Xtant x604, and the sound is incredible. Previously had them running on a Rockford and the difference was night and day when I switched to the Xtant.

Also can someone explain to me why some people thinks that it is neccessary to run 150-200 watts to separates. At that volume i would think that the experience would be more painful than enjoyable. Just Curious.

-------------
Onedonut16

Pioneer Premier mp960            
MB Quart QSD 216
Image Dynamics IDMax 12D4 V.3
Xtant X604
MB Quart QAA1000




Posted By: arrow12
Date Posted: February 14, 2006 at 9:33 PM

An amplifier's RMS rating can exceed the speakers RMS rating IF YOU SET THE GAIN CORRECTLY.  If you set the gain incorrectly, then you could run into some real, real serious problems.  It's all about setting the gain right.  This can sometimes be a good thing because you wok the amp less, but you MUST know what you are doing.



-------------
That's my opinion. Take it, leave it, or correct me.




Posted By: onedonut16
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 2:11 AM
I understand and know how to set gains, and I also understand the reasoning behind having extra power so that your amp doesn't get overworked. I simply don't understand why you need that kind of excess.          

-------------
Onedonut16

Pioneer Premier mp960            
MB Quart QSD 216
Image Dynamics IDMax 12D4 V.3
Xtant X604
MB Quart QAA1000




Posted By: geepherder
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 6:26 AM
I always recommend using an amp to power components, but running an amp capable of 150 watts or more per channel is just not necessary.  Arrow12 is correct in the sense that it's usually possible to limit the power that an amplifier produces with the gain control.  You'll need a multimeter and some test tones.

-------------
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.




Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 7:14 AM

]Also wrote:

can someone explain to me why some people thinks that it is neccessary to run 150-200 watts to separates. At that volume i would think that the experience would be more painful than enjoyable. Just Curious

150 watts is just +3 db from 75 watts.  It depends on the overall efficiency of the system, the installation itself, the specific vehicle, and a lot of other things to be able to tell if this increase in volume would be painful.  The benefit, though, would be that you're not pushing your gear to the point of clipping (turning the volume all the way up to the "magic number") when you want to be loud.  You could keep the volume knob down just a bit.

And by driving 150-watt-rated speakers with 75 watts and less, you'll be staying well away from the speakers' thermal handling capacity.



-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: kopeah
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 1:52 PM
Well the speaker is a 250W speaker that's why I was asking for 100W x 2 or 150W x 2. I've been looking at xtant per recommendation by onedonut16 and they do looks really good. One of my friend also recommended me to zed audio which sounds really good and clear. I guess I will have to decide on which amp to buy by this weekend .. :)

Right now I have three on my list to thing about and they are Xtant, DLS, and Zed Audio.








Posted By: forbidden
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 1:55 PM
I would ensure that Eclipse and Zapco are added to this short list, especially the upper end Zapco amps.

-------------
Top Secret, I can tell you but then my wife will kill me.




Posted By: kfr01
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 3:24 PM

I'm going to recommend

Eclipse Premium Digital Amplifier Series;

Altomobile class d amplifiers; and

Xtant 1.1i + Xtant class d subwoofer amplifier.

I'm incredibly convinced that full range class d or t amplifiers are the future of car audio.  While these brands aren't the cheapest, the money saved by not having to upgrade your alternator, wiring, and other power system components is great.  High efficiency low heat designs were made for car audio.

Prior to moving to the Xtant 1.1i mono blocks for my front channels, I was bi-amping my front components with a class ab Xtant.  I was bridging an Xtant class ab 2-channel amplifer to my subwoofer.  Car batteries didn't last quite as long as I would have liked them to and the sound seemed as if the dynamics were pulling back ever so slightly when I turned the volume up.  Moving to class d not only eleviated all these issues; I now feel no need to upgrade my power system, but it also gave me some great separation and added some great midbass tightness.  The highs are slightly brighter with the 1.1i than with my old ab, but overall I am much happier with an all class d system than my old class ab rig. 

btw:  Onedonut:  impressive system list. 



-------------
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder




Posted By: boulderguy
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 11:05 PM

While we're on the topic, some brands that were once respectable but I'm unsure of now -

Soundstream, PG, PPI, Xtant, HiFonics

Have all these guys gone the route of RF or still making the good stuff?





Posted By: kfr01
Date Posted: February 15, 2006 at 11:21 PM

I've had nothing but a great experience with Xtant.  I've owned 6 Xtant amps in two years.  No problems, great sound. 

I hear they don't hold up to SPL abuse.  They weren't designed to be SPL amplifiers.  The power supplies are regulated more tightly than your average SPL amp.  They are well built, but aren't ready to be in a car with very high sound pressure levels.  This is fine with me, because I couldn't give a rats ass about SPL.

The Xtant 1.1i received good reviews.  Example:

https://caraudiomag.com/testreports/0308cae_xtant/

The reviewer found the build quality to be excellent and the sound quality (measured and subjective) to best many class ab car audio amps. 

While I don't think the Xtant name has the same weight it carried in the mid 90's, I'd still place it above the average offerings from HiFonics, PG, PPI, and Soundstream. 

I say average because each of those companies makes some nice products at the top of their price offerings. 



-------------
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder




Posted By: DYohn
Date Posted: February 16, 2006 at 9:52 AM
As someone who owns a set of Seas Lotus Reference comps (which retail for around $1200 by the way) I agree with the above recommendations to not scrimp on a cheap amp.  Those speakers will reveal every shortcoming in the amp and head unit.  50 watts per channel is more than enough, 100 watts is the most I've ever run to mine.  I use a Nakamichi amp.  Look for something with 0.5% THD or less.  Eclipse, Xtant, Diamond, JBL, etc.

-------------
Support the12volt.com




Posted By: kopeah
Date Posted: February 17, 2006 at 8:58 AM
Well, I've made up my mind thanks to the good ppl here. I've decided to get xtant x604.
I think we need a sticky thread with a list of good SQ amps and list of good SPL amps. It's just something that ppl can refer to when look for amp.

Thanks everyone .. :)






Posted By: D'Ecosse
Date Posted: February 22, 2006 at 1:39 PM

I run a set of Lotus Reference, bi-amped from a Tru Technology Copper 7.  With Bi-amping I can run Time Alignment into the separate components.

The result is really good if I say so myself.

I think you can do a lot better than the Xtant - once were considered good, not so these days. An incredible number of these endup on E-Bay E-tailers because of the considerable number of warranty returns.

Tru, Zapco & Brax would be my top choices.

Here's my install .......

posted_image

posted_image

posted_image





Posted By: fuscobal
Date Posted: February 22, 2006 at 5:15 PM
I'm going with Audison VRX amps. I would be curious though to here the impression of someone who compared them to Brax, X-Tant, Tru or Zapco ! Regarding the amount of power, it's not that u'll ever need 100W on mids or highs but it's really cool to see that your ears start to distort before the speakers. On properly recorded songs i've never heard distortions on my system no matter how loud it played and i can assure u it played pretty loud sometimes !





Print Page | Close Window