Print Page | Close Window

dvc parallel wiring 2 different ways

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=92230
Printed Date: April 26, 2024 at 8:40 PM


Topic: dvc parallel wiring 2 different ways

Posted By: quarantine
Subject: dvc parallel wiring 2 different ways
Date Posted: March 28, 2007 at 3:30 PM

from the diagram, both are parallel wired correct? is there a difference of any sort? please explain. do you prefer one over the other? is there a difference in final load? I'm a bit curious to know, and a search did not help. thanks for the input

posted_image



Replies:

Posted By: stevdart
Date Posted: March 28, 2007 at 5:48 PM
Both illustrations show parallel connections of the same three points of like polarity.  I prefer the top because there would ultimately be less wire length, but use whichever way is most convenient for you in your particular application.

-------------
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.




Posted By: roo-dog
Date Posted: March 28, 2007 at 6:08 PM

yeah, both the same.  the only advantage of the latter would be that you could change the configuration (and impedence) by re-wiring at the amp, without rewiring subs.  however, this is for the most part useless, unless you are running a competition amp that is capable of very low impedences.  most systems are designed to be wired up in only a certain configuration. 

i had an old phoenix ms-2125 that i had wired in this fashion.  driving around i ran it at 2-ohms, and for shows, i would re-wire it to 1/2 ohm and show off what a 250 watt amp can do.  i wish i had known more about relays back then- i could have just ran a switch to some relays and never touched the wires with the same effect (lol-live and learn)



-------------
(4)g5-1244, (4)gtr12, (2)ppipcx2400, (1)pcx4125, (1)pc4800.2, (3) pair mb quart 6.5"Q, (4)optimas, alumapro (1)5 and(1)15 farad cap, premier deh-p860mp, pioneer xm -dual H.O. alternators




Posted By: quarantine
Date Posted: March 28, 2007 at 7:01 PM
thank you for replies. As of now my sub is wires as the second illustration. I was thinking of switching to the first, because thats how I see a parallel connection on different websites. So if they are the same, then a change wont be necessary.




Posted By: 82urq
Date Posted: March 29, 2007 at 11:15 AM
roo-dog wrote:

yeah, both the same. the only advantage of the latter would be that you could change the configuration (and impedence) by re-wiring at the amp, without rewiring subs. however, this is for the most part useless, unless you are running a competition amp that is capable of very low impedences. most systems are designed to be wired up in only a certain configuration.

i had an old phoenix ms-2125 that i had wired in this fashion. driving around i ran it at 2-ohms, and for shows, i would re-wire it to 1/2 ohm and show off what a 250 watt amp can do. i wish i had known more about relays back then- i could have just ran a switch to some relays and never touched the wires with the same effect (lol-live and learn)


I would like to know more about how to set up relays to do that?




Posted By: rudydapimp
Date Posted: March 29, 2007 at 1:48 PM





Print Page | Close Window