Print Page | Close Window

rough method for clipping detection

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=93723
Printed Date: May 01, 2024 at 6:54 PM


Topic: rough method for clipping detection

Posted By: wormy
Subject: rough method for clipping detection
Date Posted: May 08, 2007 at 1:11 PM

So I understand that the only way to accurately detect clipping on the outputs of my amplifier is to use an oscilliscope to measure the waves.  However, I need a method to roughly determine clipping with a voltmeter.

My understanding of clipping is that the amplifier is asked to deliver power beyond its voltage output capabilities, so the amplifier then attempts to meet the output demand using amps instead.  Going off that idea, I decided to try setting my amplifier gains by turning them up until the voltage stopped rising.  My guess was that that would be the point of clipping...at least roughly speaking.  However, the amplifier has a clipping light that comes on at roughly 33.7 volts according to my voltmeter, while the highest voltage that my voltmeter read was 65 volts.

I am wondering if my test could be considered good enough.

The amplifier I tested was a MB Quart RAA1000.  It is rated to output 250 watts at 4 ohms, 500 watts at 2 ohms, and 1000 watts at 1 ohm.  I determined that it was capable of outputting roughly 284 watts at 4 ohms, 568 watts at 2 ohms, and 1136 watts at 1 ohm without the clipping light on the amplifier turning on.  At the highest voltage that the amplifier put out, the power should be roughly 1056 watts at 4 ohms, 2113 watts at 2 ohms, and 4225 watts at 1 ohm.  The wattage appears believable when the amplifier's clipping light activates.  It does not seem very likely, however, that the amplifier is capable of the output at the point that I determined to be the highest voltage.

Any thoughts, advice, and insight, would be greatly appreciated.



-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS



Replies:

Posted By: aznboi3644
Date Posted: May 08, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Um...if you play a test tone and turn up the gain slowly you can hear clipping as the tone changes in pitch




Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 08, 2007 at 8:42 PM
Alright...I guess I'll spend some time listening to my sine waves.

-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: Steven Kephart
Date Posted: May 08, 2007 at 9:38 PM

When I worked at Adire, I produced a video of one of our Brahma's playing full range, and ran the amplifier into clipping so you can hear what it sounds like.  Here's a link to it: https://realmofexcursion.com/videos/Adire/brahma12.13.wmv  Unfortunately Realm of Excursions mixed several videos I did together not understanding the point, so you will find the clipping video at the end.  The other videos were to show the very low inductance of the XBL^2 motor and it's impressive upper extention.  posted_image





Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 09, 2007 at 9:44 AM
I'll see if I can't listen to that video with some better speakers than these laptop speakers.  I do appreciate the link.  However, I still need some advice on my method for roughly setting an amplifier's gains.  I have begun competing in SPL with MECA and I don't have alot of money...my girlfriend won't let me spend it...lol.  I have one 250 Watt 12" subwoofer and I am trying to avoid blowing it.  I still need all the power I can get though, so I can't just set the output voltage to deliver 250 Watts, because then there would be no point in my competing.  I'm trying for Chris Caudel in Street 1.  I feel like if I can at least manage a 145 decibels with that 12", then I might have a shot at him this year.  However, if I blow the 12" due to clipping, then I learn very little beyond what I already know.  If you have access to an oscilliscope and multimeter, then please recreate the test for me and see if the oscilliscope agrees.  If that amplifier can honestly amplify a signal that much, then there is no need in my spending $2000 on an amplifier.

-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: zhalverson
Date Posted: May 09, 2007 at 4:53 PM

I'm not sure what you're asking but there's no way that amp is going to put out 4000 watts.  If you have a 250 watt sub why would it matter? That sub is rated at 250 watts and maybe it can handle more but you're playing with fire when you start exceeding the rated power handling. 

That amp has a max of 120 amp draw i believe.  120 amps x14 volts x.85 efficiency=1428 watts max. and that's being very generous in every regard.  Anyways that's running at 1 ohm and you'll need lots of power to deliver 120 amps to it.  Personally I would say if that amp has a light that tells you its clipping at 284 watts @ 4 ohms, set it to right below that and get what you can out of it.  Probably not going to get much gain if any after that with a few more watts to that sub anyhow.

What you need to consider for your test is how the voltages are being measured.  The a/c wave should be a perfect sine wave right up to immediately before clipping.  That would be your max. gain setting and therefore your maximum voltage.  Now you continue to raise the gain and the voltage increases.  What's happening is you're "clipping" the top of the sine wave and it's approaching a square wave.  When you've really got that clipping hard it basically looks like a square wave.  A square wave goes from max to min voltages almost immediately instead of in the nice gradual manner of the sine wave before clipping.  Now your voltmeter is measuring the average voltage of this square a/c wave and it of course is much higher.  The voltage tells you nothing of when your amp actually started clipping and therefore is pretty much useless for setting the gain at it's perfect level.  So no your test isn't really good enough.





Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 09, 2007 at 7:08 PM

So, according to your statement, my test measures the peak voltage since the voltmeter is measuring the RMS voltage and because the only thing it is averaging is the peak voltage then the number it is outputing is the peak voltage.  So, with that figure, I can take the Root Mean Square of that number and have a rough idea of the highest unclipped voltage.  Does that sound okay to you?  I appreciate the input zhalverson!  I've been hoping for that advice all day.

Please do keep in mind that I am competing in SPL competitions and that I am not interested in the RMS Wattage that was established with the intention of avoiding the meltdown of the adhesives holding the voice coils in place.  I am more interested in the wattage that will drive the driver to its Xmax limitations.



-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 09, 2007 at 7:09 PM
...lol.  So, how exactly do I take the Root Mean Square?

-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: Alpine Guy
Date Posted: May 09, 2007 at 9:36 PM
RMS is 70.7% of a peak AC voltage, so if you want the RMS of say 10V peak to peak, you take 10 X .707= 7.07Vrms

-------------
2003 Chevy Avalanche,Eclipse CD7000,Morel Elate 5,Adire Extremis,Alpine PDX-4.150, 15" TC-3000, 2 Alpine PDX-1.1000, 470Amp HO Alt.




Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 09, 2007 at 10:09 PM
Thank you Alpine Guy!  Wow, .707 appears to be a pretty popular number in the car stereo world...lol.

-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: zhalverson
Date Posted: May 10, 2007 at 12:17 AM
wormy] wrote:

p>So, according to your statement, my test measures the peak voltage since the voltmeter is measuring the RMS voltage and because the only thing it is averaging is the peak voltage then the number it is outputing is the peak voltage.  So, with that figure, I can take the Root Mean Square of that number and have a rough idea of the highest unclipped voltage.  Does that sound okay to you?  I appreciate the input zhalverson!  I've been hoping for that advice all day.

Please do keep in mind that I am competing in SPL competitions and that I am not interested in the RMS Wattage that was established with the intention of avoiding the meltdown of the adhesives holding the voice coils in place.  I am more interested in the wattage that will drive the driver to its Xmax limitations.


I don't think that's correct.  Your voltmeter is already giving you averaged readings, not peak to peak.  If it was peak to peak your test would be correct actually because as soon as the voltage stopped going up you'd be clipping and you'd be able to set your gains.  Unfortunately that's not how it works.  When it clips it goes to max/min voltage and stays there (square wave) and then rapidly switches.  Here ya go: https://www.geofex.com/effxfaq/distn101.htm. Much easier to understand with a picture.  Since the voltmeter sees longer max and min values it averages them and gives a higher reading.  Thus once again you're not going to be able to tell when your amplifier goes into clipping.  Just can't do it.

Also you do not need to necessarily give max. rms power not to mention exceeding it, to get your sub to reach xmax.   That is very dependent on your enclosure and frequencies being played.  Since you're competeing in SPL i'm sure you're aware of the importace of the enclosure, tuning frequencies, matching your vehicle's peaks and all that?





Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 10, 2007 at 11:41 AM

I appreciate the link.  I'll look into it after I grab a shower.

I agree with what your saying.  I'll have to spend a little more time with this to try and fully understand the concept.  Those graphs should help.

I'm tuning for a 70 Hz peak.  I was building to the 70 Hz resonance frequency, but after analyzing the curves in a program, I determined that that was not the best course of action.  If you have any advice, I'm all ears.



-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 10, 2007 at 11:43 AM
I'll start another topic for the SPL ideas if you would like for me to give you an idea of what I am doing if you might be interested in helping me.

-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS




Posted By: wormy
Date Posted: May 10, 2007 at 12:06 PM
The link helped somewhat, but I think I'll need to look it over abit more to fully grasp the concept.  Thanks again.

-------------
...typically, I just run whatever I randomly pick up off the floor.
1995 Ford Ranger Supercab
MECA member
Team CSS





Print Page | Close Window