Print Page | Close Window

best 12 subs for small sealed boxes?

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Audio
Forum Discription: Car Stereos, Amplifiers, Crossovers, Processors, Speakers, Subwoofers, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=95103
Printed Date: May 14, 2024 at 8:37 AM


Topic: best 12 subs for small sealed boxes?

Posted By: bassmechanik
Subject: best 12 subs for small sealed boxes?
Date Posted: June 25, 2007 at 9:54 AM

I need an expert here. There are some important calculations and rules to get a high powered sub that plays ultra low frequecies these daysin a small sealed box without adding an epicenter something like that. I've been told that the Kicker L7's should do the trick, but are there any other brands that are loud at frequencies below 40hz? I want 2-12" subs in a small sealed enclosure say 1.5 to 2 cuft per sub running around 400-600rms ea. Currently I have 2 12" diamond audio D3d2 and they are great for typical rap bass but some R&B songs I listen to go deeper than the subs want to let me hear. Songs like Money Maker by Ludacris, the bass is too low and I have to turn the bass way up just to feel a little of the the lows in that song.  It's like I need a booster at 20-30hz! I've read there are some things to consider like making sure if the sensitiviy range is low then the sub will need a small box and vise versa, higher sensitivity a larger box, along with the whole low & high QTS thing. Does anyone know of a couple good quality subs that might work for me? So far it's the L7 which I haven't heard yet and I'm looking at RE Audio but don't know how those sound. Thoughts anyone?




Replies:

Posted By: haemphyst
Date Posted: June 25, 2007 at 12:43 PM
The TCSounds TC1000 would fit that bill beautifully. And WAY less expendy than the Kicker, with SQ that'll put the L7 in the dirt.

Clicky

1.1 cubes for SPL, and 2.0 cubes for SQ, with extension.

-------------
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 25, 2007 at 12:53 PM
interesting I just looked them up and read a review. Said they are cool to use for home theatre which is my favorite kind of bass and also they review mentioned very low extension. Thanks dude!posted_image




Posted By: hustlin247
Date Posted: June 25, 2007 at 4:39 PM
List to Haem when it comes to ultra low bass. He always talks about how he likes his music "subterranean".

-------------
'94 Ford Explorer / Kenwood KVT-815DVD / RF Power T1682C 6x8 (all doors) / RF Power T10001 / 12" Kicker L5 (x4) / Optima Yellow Top Battery




Posted By: sedate
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 2:31 AM

bassmechanik wrote:

I want 2-12" subs in a small sealed enclosure say 1.5 to 2 cuft per sub running around 400-600rms ea.

Huh?  That's a freakin' huge enclosure.

bassmechanik wrote:

Currently I have 2 12" diamond audio D3d2 and they are great for typical rap bass but some R&B songs I listen to go deeper than the subs want to let me hear.

I mean D3's are decent entry level subs.  I would imagine the enclosure you're using probably has alot more to do with this than the woofers.  You'll find any reasonably sized sealed box won't have a whole lot in the way of .. I like this word .. 'subterranean' bass.  Notice heamph dictates two cubes per 12 for low extension on those TC1000's.  In relative terms, this is a very large enclosure for a single 12.

In your case, I think you'd be better off trying a new enclosure before blowing $350 on those woofers.  You clearly plan on a new enclosure anyway, so why not do that first?  Since you have some space to work with, why don't you try a largish ported enclosure tuned nice and low.. say.. 28hz or so.  You'll get that low-end extension you're looking for.. and if you find yourself still wanting for more, you'd have the enclosure already built for new subs..



-------------
"I'm finished!" - Daniel Plainview




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 7:48 AM
See that's jacked up, these subs now adays like the P3, Type-R and the like all have super tiny box specs reccommended and I look at the fb and it's a bit too high like around 37-45hz. Also if you make the box larger does that not take away from power handling theoretically? I agree and would feel safe buidling a new box 2 cubes per side but ported would be wierd because the spec so different based on the subs specs. On the TC site this guy had the same problem I did, he tried all type of 12's in sealed enclosures but no subterranian bass or as i call it movie theatre bass. So when he loaded up the TC's he was finally satisfied. All I want is the same range of bass from the Velodyne sub at home which is ultra low and all from an 8" woofer with very low power handling. Wha da heo?!?!?




Posted By: haemphyst
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 10:30 AM
Alls I kin tell ya, is this...

The TC1000 10, in a 1.2 cubic foot enclosure, isobarik mounted, with a 15 square inch port, 46 inches long, is tuned for 23Hz, and a maximum (anechoic) output of 108dB at 20Hz. 108 doesn't SOUND like it'll be that loud, but cabin gain will likely add 3-6dB, depending on your cabin. 111dB at 20Hz from a single 10? I'd say that's pretty damed impressive in a 1.2 foot enclosure! Is that deep enough for you? (This, BTW, is EXACTLY the enclosure I am planning for my current car set-up...) The TC drivers are FANTASTIC drivers in small enclosures, with reasonable output, and fantastic power handling capabilites.

Louder than that, and you'll be required to go to a different woofer, something like a CV 15" or 18" in a SUPER HUGE box, vented down that low. Loud, BTW, is subjective, I know this, but I still have to say that 111dB is loud enough for me, especially at 20Hz. Even your Velodyne (a fantastic home sub, BTW) would have difficulty filling a room with that frequency, at that output.

-------------
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 10:41 AM

Hey u da man, I appreciate it. I believe I will do the TC-1000 12's 4cuft sealed, I prefer the sealed sound but obviously will need mooor pawr to massage my back and pull dim lowz up atta the subterranean world! If I can afford it I'd really like a couple TC-2000's 12's and run 2 Hifonics Bx1606 for a total of 3200rms in some fantasy land one day. But it's nice to know that the TC-1000 can deal with up to 1000rms per sub.

Thanks!





Posted By: sedate
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 12:09 PM

My concern here is that you seem to believe the operating diaphram has more to do with frequency response than the enclosure.  This is *not* the case.  I notice, for a semblance of proof, you offer an anecdote from another forum. 

bassmechanik wrote:

On the TC site this guy had the same problem I did, he tried all type of 12's in sealed enclosures but no subterranian bass or as i call it movie theatre bass. So when he loaded up the TC's he was finally satisfied.

This probably had more to do with the listeners expectations than reality, *especially* if the enclosure didn't change along with the woofer.  Never trust an audio review from someone who just spent a few hundred $$$ on equipment.

bassmechanik wrote:

. All I want is the same range of bass from the Velodyne sub at home which is ultra low and all from an 8" woofer with very low power handling.

The comparison between the home woofer and the car stuff is also a bit off given the way home theatre stuff is.. well.. enclosed.  Crack the 8" and you'll probably find a smallish transmission-line enclosure or a 5th-order bandpass or something.  This is why it doesn't use much power and sounds like it's so low... its properly enclosed.

Even heamph's postings reveal the nessecity of porting for ultra-low-end extension:

haemph wrote:

The TC1000 10, in a 1.2 cubic foot enclosure, isobarik mounted, with a 15 square inch port, 46 inches long, is tuned for 23Hzp.

Look, building a massive sealed box just isn't the way to get what you are trying to get.  You'll get better frequency response, and IMO much better tonality, AND 3db if you port an enclosure that size to about where haemph is at..  23hz or so. 

If you don't believe me, which it looks like you are vested in not, head on over .. uhh.. here.. and do at least a *little* homework before sinking hundreds of dollars okay.

https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp~TID~74558~PN~1



-------------
"I'm finished!" - Daniel Plainview




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 12:21 PM
I hear ya and just need to let ya'll know I've had car systems since the early 90's and all of them hit every low without a problem, even my prior system: 2 JL w3 12's small box in an S-10 extra cab, a soundstream reference 300 and a kenwood HU. The problem now is I want gound shaking bass with the sound quality so someone recommended the Diamond D312's and it's the first time I've been disabpointed. I've had sealed boxes forever with no issues. Even my old soundstream ref 10's hit the low lows (sealed) mind you. I like the accuracy. So to me it's the subs and they just aren't made for the sounds I like to hear. The free air response on the D3's compared to TC-1000's are nite n day. in the 44hz for the D3's the TC-1000 are 19hz go figure. As I get older I'm alot more critical to a detrement but hey, I know I've heard other sealed systems destroy some low end ranges. A long time ago I met a dude who had 2 15's McCauley subs in his king cab and I couldn't even see while the music was playing the low end was so beautiful. It's going to come down to trying something new and something designed for my musical taste. Trial and error.




Posted By: KarTuneMan
Date Posted: June 26, 2007 at 5:16 PM
I have alllways been an Image dynamics kinda guy. BIG low bass, tiny boxes, and will not hurt your wallet!

-------------




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 27, 2007 at 7:45 AM

Thanks, I've heard good things about those subs, 2 different sites have different power handling ratings on the ID12's. should be 400 continous but can they handle more on a continous level? I've heard that the tonal clarity is rediculous. I listen to R&B and rap but really like musical bass tones so I need to go hear them in person.





Posted By: tdsteele
Date Posted: June 27, 2007 at 9:35 AM
I used to run Diamond CM3 10's .I had them in a Diamond recommended transmission style ported enclosure and they did wonderfully, but the enclosure was tuned to 40 hz so yeah they didn't do great on the lowend, but they didnt do that bad either. Have you contacted their tech support? I have dealt with them alot and they will work with you to get the results you want. I imagine they could design a box to make them hit lower for you, that is if you wanted to keep them. Just a thought.




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 27, 2007 at 9:45 AM
Yeah I've done all the research and what I found is that the specs of this sub don't match my needs. The low freq response on the TC-1000 and ID12's are below 20hz, on the Diamond it's well above 30hz. I think like 44hz. So even if I build a huge box it'll be off somewhere else. Time to retire these puppies. I need the subterranean levels of bass and my ears just can't take it anymore. Could I be anymore dramatic?!?!? posted_image




Posted By: xtremej
Date Posted: June 27, 2007 at 3:41 PM
Freq. response of the diamond d3 12" is from 25hz to 250 hz. We have built tuned enclosures for them that drop pretty low, not sure on specfics numbers. As others have stated, the enclosure is going to make the largest impact. I have seen as well as others, some very expensive subwoofers that should "perform" great sound awful in poorly designed/built enclosure and vise versa. With all the drama, just try this- set your purse down call diamond tech-get some specs on enclosures and build one.......




Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 27, 2007 at 3:53 PM
Oh I agree, I did call them but they say use the spec sheet to build. My question is in your experience is it ok to build out of spec? I downloaded WinISD and it shows a much better response in a sealed enclosure if it's larger. But I just want to be sure that it's not going to jack up my SQ, ya na mean? Wha chu think?




Posted By: xtremej
Date Posted: June 27, 2007 at 4:43 PM

Yes it ok to build out of spec. I have learned a lot of manufatures specs are great starting points and for most decent enough sound. I should ask how long have been using the d3's, as they will eventulay become worn. By the way I usually run the the d1's and d'3 in a 1.5 cu. ft per sub enclosure, they drop pretty low. I have also experiment with slot ported eclosures with the diamonds. We made a couple that took a bit to get what the customer wanted tun-ing wise. Recently I ordered a pre-fab from audio enhancers and it hits really low, maybe hit them up for some exact tuning specs. The big draw back to it was, it cost a fortune to ship @ 75lbs. And yes it is made for diamond subs specifically. I am sure the tc sounds are really good also. I see they get high marks from other members, I just have been  impressed with diamonds quality and it not just because I sell them either. Hope this helps. If you wish to drop really low maybe a D9 15"posted_image.





Posted By: bassmechanik
Date Posted: June 29, 2007 at 9:09 AM
Geez I was looking for this message and almost lost it. Ok what's the deal with the D3's. This is the first time I bought a sub that at first was so loud, thought I was pushing a hundred more watts than I had. At the same time the sub was so tight it struggled to hit the low lows. One day I turned on the system and the strength was gone (guess it was broken in) so it's sounds quite a bit different and much more loose. I agree with you, those puppies change over a short time. I'm moving up to either the TC-1000 or the Soundstream RFW-12. On WinISD the output and smooth rolloff are impecable so I want to hear one in real life. I love that program, it seems to tell the truth about what you are going to hear. So I'll be sure to post an article on the results when I do.posted_image





Print Page | Close Window