Print Page | Close Window

94 lexus sc300, alarm in conjunction with oem

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Security and Convenience
Forum Discription: Car Alarms, Keyless Entries, Remote Starters, Immobilizer Bypasses, Sensors, Door Locks, Window Modules, Heated Mirrors, Heated Seats, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=113360
Printed Date: May 07, 2024 at 10:55 PM


Topic: 94 lexus sc300, alarm in conjunction with oem

Posted By: kmn5
Subject: 94 lexus sc300, alarm in conjunction with oem
Date Posted: April 23, 2009 at 8:49 AM

Hi All,
I just picked up a Compustar P2W900FMAS for my 1994 Lexus SC300 (5speed)
I know most of the other SC300 out there with aftermarket alarms are used at the smae time with the OEM on, as it's very time consuming to remove the OEM entirely. So most installation kinda piggy back on top of it, which is fine, as the stock system is very good(as far as stock ones are concerned), just that the remotes usually go bad with time.
The stock one will trigger when the hood or trunk is opened (in addition to doors)

My question is that I would like to use the existing triggers for the hood/trunk to trigger the compustar, how can I go about doing that?
Should I tap the individual OE sensors? or have the OE alarm send a signal to trigger the compustar?

This is my first big alarm install, I've wired up audio systems before, and I do 90% of the wrenching (except when a lift is needed)
I would like to tackle this on my own, instead of having someone else do it (as I get to learn by doing as well)

thanks



Replies:

Posted By: kmn5
Date Posted: April 23, 2009 at 9:06 AM
FYI: I do have the factory wiring manual and the compustar diagram, but I could use some pointers

also have a question wiring question
this this example the signal from the compustar going to the door locks.
in figure 1, the wire just taps the necessary door lock wire (ground)
But wouldn't the signal cause a problem since it will travel in both directions once tapped into the lock wire?

in figure 2 I have a diode on the original wire, preventing the signal form traveling back into the harness the other way

Which is correct?
posted_image

thanks




Posted By: loneranger
Date Posted: April 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM
Either. It's a type be locking system. A diode is not needed.

-------------
Ideal - cmon dude, add to topics in a useful manner, not stuff that is obvious.
Story - Phzzzt! Hey, what happened?! ... Isn't it obvious?
Moral - Never dismiss the obvious.





Print Page | Close Window