Print Page | Close Window

rpm sensing circuit?

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Security and Convenience
Forum Discription: Car Alarms, Keyless Entries, Remote Starters, Immobilizer Bypasses, Sensors, Door Locks, Window Modules, Heated Mirrors, Heated Seats, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=122393
Printed Date: May 17, 2024 at 8:25 PM


Topic: rpm sensing circuit?

Posted By: micrors4racer
Subject: rpm sensing circuit?
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM

Is there anyway to make something that senses rpms and then switch something on or off? I am trying to build an adjustable rev-limiter. Basically it will switch a relay to turn off the ignition circuit at a certain rpm.



Replies:

Posted By: oldspark
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 9:18 AM
Yep.
Two common methods....
A frequency switch (when frequency exceeds...)
A frequency to voltage converter (eg LM2907/2917 or NTE995) and set you voltage.

There are kits like Jaycar's KC5378 Frequency Switch kit (currently out of stock).... I'm sure others will have equivalents.




Posted By: howie ll
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 4:06 PM
Thought a rev-limiter was already built in to most cars.




Posted By: 91stt
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 4:22 PM
fuel cut may be a better option, since with ignition cut, the ECU may still signal injectors to continue supplying fuel.

-------------
This information is provided only as a reference.
All circuits should be verified with a digital multi-meter prior to making any connections.




Posted By: KPierson
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 4:56 PM

I did this once and it didn't work very well at all with a simple frequency switch because there is no "lead in".  From memory what happened was the motor had enough power to overshoot the cutoff point by a significant amount, and then died down below the setpoint, then shot past again due to the motor going back to full power.

In the end, what worked, was using a frequency monitoring device (microcontroller) and setting up three "zones".  The "Low zone" allows full engine power, the "Medium zone" (setpoint - X RPM) allowed only a few ignition cycles to fire in a somewhat random fashion (don't cut the same cylinders each time) and the final zone (> then setpoint) was zero ignition.  This works well because going in to the setpoint you are no longer generating full power and when you go from cut back to the "medium zone" again you are not applying full power.  I have some you tube videos out there - search for KPiersonTec 2 Step

Ignition is typically the source to cut because it is much easier to work with.  An ignition event is so short that it can be killed without risking detonation.  At higher RPMs fuel injectors overlap each other and trying to cut one off could cut another off (assuming one power source and not individual injector control) which can lead to a lean condition and a misfire.



-------------
Kevin Pierson




Posted By: KPierson
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 4:57 PM
And as a heads up, if you are going to cut ignition make sure you either stay off the limiter or get rid of your cats because that unburnt fuel is going to go somewhere!

-------------
Kevin Pierson




Posted By: oldspark
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 6:43 PM
91stt] wrote:

fuel cut may be a better option, since with ignition cut, the ECU may still signal injectors to continue supplying fuel.

No way - that's almost as bad as oil pressure to control fuel pumps....

Over-rev limiters usually work by either limiting the injection, else cutting ignition pulses (on an evenly spaced basis until finall totaol kill).

Cutting fuel - apart from running injectors dry plus any lag with suge tanks, fuel bowls (cabies) etc - risks piston damage... (lean mixture).
Do what oil pressure should do - ignition kill.   


BTW - if you have an analog tacho, you have a frequency to voltage converter. You might be able to tap the meter signal.




Posted By: 91stt
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 8:03 PM
oldspark wrote:

91stt] wrote:

fuel cut may be a better option, since with ignition cut, the ECU may still signal injectors to continue supplying fuel.

No way - that's almost as bad as oil pressure to control fuel pumps....

Over-rev limiters usually work by either limiting the injection, else cutting ignition pulses (on an evenly spaced basis until finall totaol kill).

Cutting fuel - apart from running injectors dry plus any lag with suge tanks, fuel bowls (cabies) etc - risks piston damage... (lean mixture).
Do what oil pressure should do - ignition kill.   


BTW - if you have an analog tacho, you have a frequency to voltage converter. You might be able to tap the meter signal.



My response wasn't meant to imply cutting power to the fuel pump. I apologize if that is how it came out. Controlling the injectors is much less current to deal with than the fuel pump. The injectors also respond much quicker.
As KP has pointed out, you will have to account for the fuel when cutting ignition.

I may be possible to trick the ECU into thinking that the throttle has snapped shut which in turn pulls fuel.

What kind of car is it?

-------------
This information is provided only as a reference.
All circuits should be verified with a digital multi-meter prior to making any connections.




Posted By: micrors4racer
Date Posted: June 23, 2010 at 9:11 PM
This is a toyota AE86. Howie it does have a built in fuel cut but as a drift car, letting it hit fuel cut at 8k rpm repeatedly is already at the engines stress point. This will also greatly help when launching. KPierson that is exactly what i need, a step that can be activated by button or the handbrake switch. There is no need to worry about the flaming exhausts haha the car has a full race exhaust with no cats which currently already shoots out flames under high rpms.

Such a product already exists call the Bee-R Rev limiter but at the cost of $300, I think the people here at the12volt can teach me a cheaper way. https://www.neweraparts.com/Default.aspx?tabid=54&List=0&Productid=17

Oldspark's suggestion https://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=KC5378 maybe plausible, is it already assembled or do I have to put the components together my self? Any other suggestions?




Posted By: KPierson
Date Posted: June 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM

Again, in my personal experiance (on my TT G35 coupe) a simple frequency switch will not work well at all as an accurate rev limiter.

Are you looking for a rev limiter, a launch controller, or just a button activated rev limiter?



-------------
Kevin Pierson




Posted By: micrors4racer
Date Posted: June 25, 2010 at 6:24 PM
I am looking more for an adjustable rev limiter that can be activated by a switch. Because on some tracks it is necessary to fully use up to 7500rpm while teaching novices it would be better to limit the rpm.




Posted By: oldspark
Date Posted: June 27, 2010 at 5:19 AM
Search for adjustable rev limiters.




Posted By: micrors4racer
Date Posted: June 27, 2010 at 5:21 PM
I posted one up on the last page but their around $350 or so with the only feature being it has a gain knob that can adjust how fast it cuts the ignition purely to make big flames shoot out. I found someone online that used a tachometer with an adjustable shift light and the shift light instead triggers a relay to shut off the ignition coil. I don't need the tachometer part just the rpm sensing circuit and I think the jaycar electronics circuit https://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=KC5378 will do the job, just have to wait until its available.




Posted By: oldspark
Date Posted: June 27, 2010 at 7:36 PM
What you want is a full circuit, and that would probably be done with a PIC.
EG - frequency in, set/dial trigger points(s), gradually drop out spark.
It is not done as a total cut out - especially for racing/performance engines.




Posted By: Ween
Date Posted: June 28, 2010 at 7:49 AM

hi,

maybe add an ignition control box (msd, mallory) that has a rev limiter function built in?  that should drop the cylinders randomly, give you adjustable set point.

m





Posted By: oldspark
Date Posted: June 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM
I'd second that - get CDI at the same time - the "best & only" ignition (F1 excepted).
Unless of course its distributorless....




Posted By: Ween
Date Posted: June 28, 2010 at 8:52 PM

check summit racing...rev limiters. they show products that don't require an aftermarket ignition box.

m





Posted By: oldspark
Date Posted: July 22, 2010 at 7:27 AM
I recently found some old 1985 mags.
One had a LED tacho with a 20-LED bargraph.
Of interest was its over-rev indication - it flashed the display.
It was simple wrt merely being leads clipped to the appropriate LED. It could switch between 2 limits.

The circuit is standard for its type - the ignition pulses (coil) feed an LM2917 frequency to voltage converter which then fed 2 cascaded LM3914 LED dot/bargraph divers (voltage controlled).

It highlighted the simple building-block type circuits to achieve aims. Not much knowledge required - the main skill being soldering.

But as I originally suggested, just the front end of it could be used - the LM2917 triggering different (pre-set) sensors (op-amps or comparators). These could be set to whatever RPM.
Else maybe the original tacho circuit above if the "LED spacing" is acceptable - ie, 20 LEDs over 8kRPM means 400RPM increments. Double the number of LED drivers for 200RPM etc. And there is no need to include the LEDs - in fact you could reduce it to ONE only LED driver by having a offset (eg, so the LED driver only reacts to 6,000-8,000 RPM etc (hence 200RPM resolution for one LED driver).

The outputs of either circuit could be combined with a gear sensor or other inputs (like nitrous or temp - whatever it is you want to vary the over-rev alarm) through diodes (else logic gates).

The alarm could the trigger whatever - the ignition inhibitor, lamps, buzzers, etc.


I posted this because I often find those older "discrete" circuits simpler and cheaper to realise than uPC or PIC designs, though all are cheaper than most commercial "single use & dedicated" offerings!

PACAXEs require programmers etc which - even though cheap - get somewhat technical.
Otherwise there are modules like the FB.

Though I'd consider uPC modules instead.....
I opted for the Arduino (Duemilanove) for its $40 price tag, USB connectivity, and plethora of free web programs & projects etc.
And with its 20Mhz ATMega328 it is more than powerful enough. (I think that'll blow away at least the old IMB-AT 286 machines.)





Print Page | Close Window