Print Page | Close Window

kill door lock power when armed

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Security and Convenience
Forum Discription: Car Alarms, Keyless Entries, Remote Starters, Immobilizer Bypasses, Sensors, Door Locks, Window Modules, Heated Mirrors, Heated Seats, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=22896
Printed Date: July 07, 2025 at 2:07 PM


Topic: kill door lock power when armed

Posted By: crosswired
Subject: kill door lock power when armed
Date Posted: December 16, 2003 at 2:38 AM

hello. i am a newbie, and tried searching my subject to no avail.  this may be stupid/elementary, so i aploogize in advance. 

i have a 94 camaro with factory keyless and that passlock crud, along with K.E aftermarket alarm (didnt come with O.E. fobs when purchased-didnt know til i wired in the aftermarket alarm that it had factory KE).   can one install a relay to kill the power to the door lock switches when the alarm is hot?  on camaros, there is no door frame, so one could use a coathanger to push the unlock switch.  i figured just sticking a relay in (activated  from, say,  the trigger for the starter kill) would work. i wonder about the KE still working upon disarm.  doesnt the KE get all its power from the relay source (activated via the alarm lock/unlock triggers)? (could the KE work, even if O.E power was unavailable) ?   its late, and im sure this doesnt make sense, but hopefully you get what i mean.

please let me know your thoughts (or refer me elsewhere if this has been covered and i missed it). thank you all in advance.  great site.




Replies:

Posted By: draasch
Date Posted: December 16, 2003 at 8:39 AM
I would just install an anlarm....if you are going to trying the relay, why not protect the whole car?????

-------------
Good Luck
David
Ace Security
813-376-9778
Tampa
Donate to the 12volt





Posted By: crosswired
Date Posted: December 16, 2003 at 2:06 PM

draasch wrote:

I would just install an anlarm....if you are going to trying the relay, why not protect the whole car?????

draasch, thank you for the reply.  sorry, i guess i wasnt clear; i have installed the alarm.  whether or not any alarm is installed or not, the door lock switches remain alive when the car is off and locked, etc.  so i was thinking of adding a relay into the system to kill the power to the lock switch when the alarm is armed, so no one can use a coat hanger to pop the power lock switch. 

there is a system in, just want to try to make it better.  make sense?  thanks again for all replies.





Posted By: HamiltonAudio
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 9:26 AM

that car is a positive pulse doorlock system, right?  why not simply interrupt the SWITCH wires that trigger the doorlock module in the car??  find the wires (baby blue and white or black?), and run a pair of relays much like you would a starter kill.  When at rest, the doorlock wires have continuity.  when alarm is armed, the starter kill output opens the relay, opening the switch circuit and killing them.  to add reliability, use the (diode isolated) pulse from the doorlock to energize the coil as well...this way the relay will only actually open when someone tries to use the switch while armed (versus the relay flipping back and forth on each arm/disarm)....seems like a bit of a pain, but it would work.  call it "doorlock kill"  !!

b





Posted By: crosswired
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 3:00 PM

thank you very much for the info. that is what i was lookin for.  i was not sure what wires i would cut (it has rev polarity locks, IIRC, and factory keyless entry).  i have read how the rev polarity locks work, but really dont get it. 

 are you saying to basically use the existing  unlock wire i have already cut  (for my new keyless entry alarm)???? im thinking that if i use that wire,i would find my existing relay for unlock (for the alarm), and unplug the cut wire (running through 87A - the hot side of the wire from the switch).  i would run that through   87A  (and 86- as a trigger)  of a  new relay. hook85 to the neg output of the alarm.   and run a wire from 30 to 87A of the unlock relay i already have  for the alarm. the other relay (existing) for actually unlocking with KE would be closer to the locks (this new relay is upstream). 

does this  sound right?  im sorry, i am a newbie and try to pick things up as  i go. no formal experience, training, etc.  i apologize for my poor use of terminology and jargon. i try to imagine what i can based on what i know, which is not much. i understand the part about using the lock switch as a trigger (why i used the unlock trigger at 86 above), so the relay only has to switch when someone actually tries to use the switch with the alarm armed (good idea).  would i use a 4001 diode (im just now trying to understand diodes more? i understand their purpose, just not which ones are right for what application).  i have extra starter kill sockets, so id likely use one of those if that diode would work (i see no reason why not).

please let me know where i am wrong on my above schematic thinking.  or if you know an easier way to do it. if i knew how, i would have made you a diagram to illustrate this. i hope you can make sense of it. i really appreciate all of your help with this. thank you very much.





Posted By: wiretapper
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 3:52 PM
 Your system is a reverse polarity 5-wire system. Go to the pass. kick and find the keyless module.  Then find the Orange wire that goes directly to the pass. switch. This is the doorlock power lead. Wire in a relay just like a starter kill relay on this wire and your doors will become dead when armed, but will still lock and unlock with the remote.  Try it.




Posted By: crosswired
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 6:49 PM

wiretapper wrote:

 Your system is a reverse polarity 5-wire system. Go to the pass. kick and find the keyless module.  Then find the Orange wire that goes directly to the pass. switch. This is the doorlock power lead. Wire in a relay just like a starter kill relay on this wire and your doors will become dead when armed, but will still lock and unlock with the remote.  Try it.

sweet. that is what i needed to know.  so just run (for instance):

 85: 12+ constant.  

86 : neg trigger  wire from alarm for starter kill.  

30: one side of the now cut  power-to-locks wire (orange)

87A: other side of cut wire (orange).

 ive been meaning to ask this and now is a good time.  does it matter which side of the wire goes to 87A and which goes to 30 on a starter kill relay/socket?   should the "motor" side be on one or the other terminal or does it not matter (ive never seen install instructions say it matters).  

thank you all so much. i think i tried to make it much more difficult than it is. good stuff. 





Posted By: auex
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 8:29 PM
You will have to do this for both doors if the passenger's side has a switch. A more effective way would be to wire a second relay like a starter kill into one of the motor wires for the lock (has to be lock becuase the unlock wires are different for driver's and passenger's side of the unlock because of progressive unlock, it will still work with one door if you use the unlock wire) to brake contact, if you cut this wire then the entire system doesn't work.
EDIT: One more thing, you will probably have to set your alarm to a double pusle unlock to have the alarm unlock the doors.

-------------
Certified Security Specialist
Always check info with a digital multimeter.
I promise to be good.
Tell Darwin I sent you.

I've been sick lately, sorry I won't be on much.




Posted By: wiretapper
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 9:17 PM
Possibly. But I'd guess being that the pass. switch is the master in this car, it may just work as long as the feed for the master switch is interrupted and not any others.




Posted By: Teken
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 9:17 PM
This is alot of work, where a very simple switch could do the very same thing.

At end of the day, your vehicle is one that opens pretty quickly with a slim jim.

Under 5 seconds to be exact. I am not trying to thwart your efforts, but would suggest that there are other things that can prove alot more effective.


1. Glass: It takes less than 1 second to shatter the glass with the proper tool, which makes no noise, and glass break detection sensors do not pick up.

A: Apply 3M barrier film to prevent the impact, and deflect the entry through the window.


2. Door Mechanism: It takes less than 5 seconds to slim jim the release lever with mechanical effort. It takes less than 2 seconds with a electronic pulser.

A: Install one of the following mechanical items. Install a metal barrier from the window sill. It will costs you exactly $3.00 for some aluminum brackets and screws for both windows. Placed in the correct place, no slim jim will work.


Install a dual actuator soleniod. This is basicly a trunk release soleniod, but has two soleniods within one casing. One is pull, and the other is push. The push soleniod has metal pin, locking the other in place which cannot be released. This would like a hood lock but for your door.


3. Electrical: As the others have already stated above. There are several ways to cut off the power supply to the door switch. Consider what is the most efficient, and direct approach, with maximum gain.

If you are serious you could install a lower version of a mag lock system. But, that comes down to how much your willing to go.


At the end of the day it is about maximum output, with minimal effort . . .


Just my thoughts

Regards

EVIL Teken . . .
   




Posted By: Teken
Date Posted: December 18, 2003 at 9:18 PM
This is alot of work, where a very simple switch could do the very same thing.

At end of the day, your vehicle is one that opens pretty quickly with a slim jim.

Under 5 seconds to be exact. I am not trying to thwart your efforts, but would suggest that there are other things that can prove alot more effective.


1. Glass: It takes less than 1 second to shatter the glass with the proper tool, which makes no noise, and glass break detection sensors do not pick up.

A: Apply 3M barrier film to prevent the impact, and deflect the entry through the window.


2. Door Mechanism: It takes less than 5 seconds to slim jim the release lever with mechanical effort. It takes less than 2 seconds with a electronic pulser.

A: Install one of the following mechanical items. Install a metal barrier from the window sill. It will costs you exactly $3.00 for some aluminum brackets and screws for both windows. Placed in the correct place, no slim jim will work.


Install a dual actuator soleniod. This is basicly a trunk release soleniod, but has two soleniods within one casing. One is pull, and the other is push. The push soleniod has metal pin, locking the other in place which cannot be released. This would like a hood lock but for your door.


3. Electrical: As the others have already stated above. There are several ways to cut off the power supply to the door switch. Consider what is the most efficient, and direct approach, with maximum gain.

If you are serious you could install a lower version of a mag lock system. But, that comes down to how much your willing to go.


At the end of the day it is about maximum output, with minimal effort . . .


Just my thoughts

Regards

EVIL Teken . . .
   




Posted By: crosswired
Date Posted: December 19, 2003 at 1:19 AM

thank you one and all.

the pass side switch is the master switch. i figured this would be easy (like wiretapper said). i figure that even if i cut the power wire to the locks (orange wire), the keyless would still work (the relays for the alarm get power from elsewhere, so power being cut upstream is of no matter). if i understand you, you are saying it does matter (otherwise i dont understand the need for a pulsed unlock, as auex said i may need to do).  i really dont understand how any locks except for one wires (using different resistances for lock and unlock) work.  i know what they mean (definitions, i havent seen them. im one of those whom needs to see and play with stuff; reading about it doesnt cut it. LOL).  so thats why i ask the experts here. :-)  you keep me from making big mistakes or creating big headaches.

  i figured this would be easy (one more relay, no biggie).  but given what you all have said since auex responded (my thoughts were much like what he said - simple to do. ), but it sounds like a pita.  

teken, you make many good points. i know little to none about the items you suggest. i will look into them. 

 i know someone whom is intent on breaking in will do so easily.  i just want to prevent ad hoc thieves/kids from getting in easy.  its a sleep insurance thing.  if i dont do it and it would have been  easy to do, then if something happened, id kick myself. 

also, anyone know about the starter kill socket question from my last post (does it matter which wires are connected to 87A and 30?). 

thank you all for the help. im hoping to get a consensus on whether interrupting one wire will allow for the lock switches  to be killed (w/o further mods being needed to be made).  thank you all very much. i really appreciate it. posted_image





Posted By: Teken
Date Posted: December 19, 2003 at 9:02 AM
Normally terminal 30 is used as the output, or terminal 87. As terminal 30 is the common point which the lever moves to contact 87 when voltage is applied, and rests at terminal 87a when not energized.

As for your efforts to prevent the typical *smash & grabs* you get an A for effort. But please do take the time to prevent the door from being mechanically open, via a slim jim.

$3.00 worth of parts, and some sweat equity will let you sleep alot better knowing that the key point of entry, has been removed.


Regards

EVIL Teken . . .




Posted By: crosswired
Date Posted: December 19, 2003 at 7:25 PM

Evil, good stuff again, thanks.  do you know of a write up on doing the barrier in the door? im real mechanically inclined, but havent done something like that before. im not sure what im doing, as i really dont know how a slim jim works (i know it catches the linkage, but i dont have a good grasp of what exactly it grabs).  if i saw a write up, i would mimic it and all would be good.

thanks again.





Posted By: Teken
Date Posted: December 19, 2003 at 9:34 PM
You dont even need to see a write up. When you have time to remove the inner door liner, simply move the locking linkage back, and forth, to understand how it works.

Once you are familair with its operation, and how the linkage travels to, and from.

Take a few moments to do the exact locking and unlocking from above.

You will notice that from above there is an area which *if shielded*, cannot hook, engage, or otherwise grasp the linkage to a point that would unlock the mechanism.

This is where your McGyver skills come into play. You will simply place the metal bracket or similar object to prevent any device from engaging the door linkage.

Based on your level of experience, and positive attitude, I dont see this taking you very long to come up with a plan to guard against what I have indicated.

Remember, you are to look from above, and consider how a device such as a slim jim would grasp the linkage, so from there you will know how to prevent such an attack.

Regards

EVIL Teken . . .




Posted By: crosswired
Date Posted: December 19, 2003 at 11:39 PM

sounds good.  i never knew where a slim jim grabs on, but ill check it out.  sounds like i should look at the knob linkage (camaro has the lock/unlock lever under the door handle, not a normal knob on top of the sill). also i ll look at the inner door handle linkage (IIRC, pullin the handle unlocks and opens the door. i imagine it would take quite a pull to move that linkage. LOL).   thank you again.  ill add it to the list : new door and saleen wing on the stang, two cd players and a changer to install,  crotchrocket carbs to check over and clean, and many more. LOL.  toys can be a pain.

thanks again. ill do that. still not sure about the door lock switch deal. i may just play with it, as there are different opinions on what to do and how it will change things.  that would be the next easy way to get in (coathanger and 3 seconds. i hate cars with no door frame around the window). thanks again. :-)





Posted By: Teken
Date Posted: December 22, 2003 at 11:47 AM
https://www.autobolt.com <-- This is another more invasive method of protecting the doors. I have been unable to locate the maker of the double lock soleniod which I use in my vehicle.

I will ask around to see if they are still being manufactured. Using the double lock soleniod requires alot less drilling, and damage to the vehicle.

Regards

EVIL Teken . . .





Print Page | Close Window