Print Page | Close Window

best place to mount shock sensor?

Printed From: the12volt.com
Forum Name: Car Security and Convenience
Forum Discription: Car Alarms, Keyless Entries, Remote Starters, Immobilizer Bypasses, Sensors, Door Locks, Window Modules, Heated Mirrors, Heated Seats, etc.
URL: https://www.the12volt.com/installbay/forum_posts.asp?tid=51725
Printed Date: May 13, 2024 at 10:24 PM


Topic: best place to mount shock sensor?

Posted By: jdmbuilt
Subject: best place to mount shock sensor?
Date Posted: March 10, 2005 at 11:55 PM

i read the owner's manual for the viper alarm and it says "In many vehicles, tying the sensor to the steering column or screwing it to metal will result in poor sensitivity, especially at the rear of the vehicle."

well, to my surprise, my installer mounted the shock sensor to my steering column. help me decide where to relocate it. thanks!



Replies:

Posted By: ss-installer
Date Posted: March 11, 2005 at 12:21 AM
thats where i always put them because if you mount it (for instance) behind a kick panel then that side of the car will be more sensitive than the other. it should be in a center point in the car secured to an attaching body piont. that way both sides have the same sensitivity.

-------------




Posted By: gcorrea
Date Posted: March 11, 2005 at 12:36 AM
try the fattest wire loom under your dash, it always works for me.

-------------
gcorrea




Posted By: KarTuneMan
Date Posted: March 11, 2005 at 12:39 AM
DEI says to mount your shock sensor to a LARGE wire harness.......NOT to a solid surface. This will prevent false alarms..........I'm not so sure about that .... Try and find a spot that is attached to the body of the car,.....and NOT made of plastic. Hard to do on most newer cars today though..........

-------------




Posted By: drp6730003
Date Posted: March 11, 2005 at 2:44 AM

KarTuneMan, you're right! It's hard to find!

I used to try it on a large harness, behind the stereo and inside the dash panel. Now I put it on the metal plate under dash by thin double-sided tape, which is the best place ever I feel. But is it popular to be tied to steering column?





Posted By: thepencil
Date Posted: March 11, 2005 at 9:46 AM
"But is it popular to be tied to steering column?"

Very popular with a lot of installer. It's quick and easy, but sometime this option in not always available.

I personally like to mount the sensor on a solid surface like a metal plate or body of the car if possible so that it will pick up any tampering that is going on. It’s a lot easier to test the sensitivity level and set it correctly.     The problem with mounting it to a large harness in the vehicle is that the harness absorbs most of the vibration so the sensitivity level has to be turn up to compensate for that variable.

-------------
Be careful whose advice you buy, but be patient with those who supply it.posted_image




Posted By: Fullthrottle
Date Posted: March 11, 2005 at 6:11 PM
What about the center console of a vehicle?

Attached to the floor.





Posted By: nitris
Date Posted: March 12, 2005 at 3:04 PM
ok well how about this one ive done it a couple of times on poor shock sensors, i may use a zip tie to let the sensor dangle from a harness in the car so if any movement is made it detects it i turn down the sensitivity to a reasonable level




Posted By: gcorrea
Date Posted: March 12, 2005 at 5:47 PM
back in the days shock sensors came on a metal strip that you would bend around till you found the perfect angle. problem was if you parked on a unleveled surface your alarm would false and even wind would trigger it.

-------------
gcorrea




Posted By: bretbowman
Date Posted: March 14, 2005 at 2:09 AM

DEI recommends mounting the "included" shock sensor with most of their alarms to the steering column very tightly with very strong lock tie wraps.  I believe that this is because a solid surface will pick up vibration easier than a wire loom or anything else.  These surfaces will absorb a degree of vibration/shock.  

The ideal place would be to MOUNT (with screws) the shock sensor flat against the inside of the firewall.  You will want as much of the "flat back" of the sensor to be in contact with the firewall as possible.  The more contact that the sensor has with the surface of the car that it's mounted to, the more sensitive your sensor will be. 

The idea is to then set the sensor as sensitive as possible without producing undesirable falsing.  Installers must understand that this is going to take some time and patience.  Most installers (to get the job done quickly) set the shock sensor where it's not sensitive enough (because they do not want a returning customer complaining of false shock alerts).  If you're installing your own alarm, you should have the time and 'care' to take your time and adjust the sensor little by little over a few days (assuming the sensor is easily accesible - recommended) and in this way, you can custom set the sensor to your circumstances. 

However, hands down, a HARD SOLID FLAT surface is going to be your VERY BEST bet for achieving the maximum sensitivity from a shock sensor.  Sensitivity is GOOD.  I paid over $500 for a top notch Clifford alarm with an omni-shock sensor.  I don't state this to brag, but only to point out that those who want the very best protection for their vehicle even pay extra for sensitivity.  Don't "throw away" your sensitivity of your sensor by mounting it to a wire bunch or by suspending it in mid air under the dash where it will "feel" very little vibration.

My $.02     posted_image



-------------
2002 Toyota Sequoia Limited 2WD (Clifford G5 Avantguard 5 w/ 2 SmartWindows modules) - IT Engineer - NRA Life Member - LDS Return Missionary - Married for time AND ETERNITY - Eternally sealed family




Posted By: bretbowman
Date Posted: March 14, 2005 at 10:00 PM

Ok, so how much "experience" credit do you give Directed Electronics, Inc. ?

THEY are the ones who make this recommendation.

So, I guess on THAT note, it's my $200 million  posted_image

This forum is full of so many big headed, self righteous installers it's almost shocking.

===================

Here are some links partially for your reading pleasure, but more so to dispell your ignorance:

https://www.crutchfieldadvisor.com/ISEO-rgbtcspd/learningcenter/car/security_install.html

Quote from above link: "Attach shock sensors solidly to a metal surface, using screws. Try to take advantage of an existing screw in your vehicle. If you can't find a good one, you'll have to supply your own screw. As an alternative, you can strap the shock sensor down, using nylon wire ties. Do not use Velcro or tape. "

https://www.commandoalarms.com/installtips.html

Quote from above link: "Find a location for the shock sensor that is close to the control module so the wire will not have to be extended. Keep the sensor away from heat sources. Mounting the shock sensor to the steering column (making sure not to interfere with the steering functionality) or tie wrap the sensor to the alarm wiring harness bundle for added sensitivity."



-------------
2002 Toyota Sequoia Limited 2WD (Clifford G5 Avantguard 5 w/ 2 SmartWindows modules) - IT Engineer - NRA Life Member - LDS Return Missionary - Married for time AND ETERNITY - Eternally sealed family




Posted By: Hornshockey
Date Posted: March 15, 2005 at 1:46 AM
Bret do you notice how it recommends attaching the sensor to the alarm wiring harness for added sensitivity?  I believe you've just contradicted your own opinion.   It's all relative to mass and intertia.  A piece with a higher density and thus more mass will require more force to move it.  A wiring harness is much less dense than the firewall or the steering column.  It takes alot less force to make a wiring harness move than a large chunk of metal.    I'd agree with the hanging sensor except I think it would cause alot of false alarms, high winds for example would cause that setup to trigger.  I'd have to agree with bob.

-------------
Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while; you could miss it.




Posted By: steveholtam
Date Posted: March 15, 2005 at 11:25 AM
I can say where NOT to install the sensor. I zip tied it to the alarm itself! I did that last weekend thinking I'd have a nice clean install this way. Well, my pea brain forgot about all the relays built into the alarm unit. I couldnt even lock the doors without tripping that thing :-)   It was funny, and easy to fix.

Steve




Posted By: wbread99
Date Posted: March 15, 2005 at 4:23 PM

Ahhhh.... the wiring harness will wiggle and shake, setting off the trigger. Good point. I where DEI and my new crimestopper alarm said use the harness. Thought they were insane.

Have my CS sensor mounted to the firewall and I'm not that impressed. Will relocate to the fat harness....



-------------
Sean White
Ramstein Air Base, Germany




Posted By: bretbowman
Date Posted: March 15, 2005 at 8:32 PM

The point that you're failing to see if that malicious shock will likely come from outside the car, which shock has to "shake" (if you will) the "piece with a higher density" as you put it, in order to shake that same "fat wiring harness".  As the vibration travels through more objects, it is going to gradually be absorbed and there will be less vibration to trigger the alarm once the it reaches the sensor.

As an example, say some one kicks a big dent in your drivers door.  That "malicious shock" (for lack of better term) will travel through the sheet metal of the door to the hinges in front and the locking mechanism in back into the body/frame of the vehicle.  From there will shake the firewall and may perhaps the wiring harnesses at some point.

I don't think that any one would argue that the wiring harness, not being a solid structure WILL absorb, to some degree, an amount of the shock or vibration, which DECREASES sensitivity.  That also is simple physics.  If the shock is going to travel THROUGH the frame/body of the car to GET TO a wiring harness, you're going to get the most sensitivity by mounting the shock sensor earlier in the vibration chain (if you will) so that the shock sensor picks up the shock before it has travelled through MORE items that are going to absorb the shock.

Given this, if you mount that same shock sensor INSIDE THE DOOR that was maliciously kicked, that will give you the greatest amount of sensitivity.  Since most cars only have a single shock sensor, most 'professional' installers recommend mounting the sensor central so that it will evenly 'sense' shock from any part of the vehicle (front, back, etc.)  However, doing this, you are RELYING on the fact that if someone rear ends your car in a parking lot that the vibration is going to travel through several components (all of which will absorb some of the shock) and still have ENOUGH "shock" left over to set off the sensor to notify the alarm to go off.

The bottom line and FACT of the matter is that by mounting a shock sensor on the wiring harness, you're placing the sensor "farther down in the food chain" so to speak, as opposed to mounting the shock sensor to the body/frame of the vehicle, which you're relying on to "transfer" the shock anyway.

Suit yourselves... where ever you mount your shock sensors, thoroughly test them to make sure that they are sensitive to your satisfaction.   All I can tell you is that if you mount the sensor ON THE FRAME/BODY/FIREWALL, your sensor will be "closer" to the SOURCE of the shock and therefore will receive more vibration, making it (in theory) MORE senitive.  At that point, you can decrease your adjustment on the sensor to fine tune the degree of sensitivity that you want.

This is the FACT of the matter, friends!



-------------
2002 Toyota Sequoia Limited 2WD (Clifford G5 Avantguard 5 w/ 2 SmartWindows modules) - IT Engineer - NRA Life Member - LDS Return Missionary - Married for time AND ETERNITY - Eternally sealed family




Posted By: thepencil
Date Posted: March 15, 2005 at 9:55 PM
There is nothing like a good discussion with a cup of coffee. I am going to take side and agree with Bretbowman. As much as you guys out there who wants to sell me the idea of the Kryptonite Zip Tied on the shock sensor to a large harness. I won’t buy it. I don’t know if you guys have seen one of Jim Carrey movie Liar Liar where his son tells him that beauty is in the inside then he tell his son that “Only ugly people say that”.     A reference to that movie with similar ideas of the Kryptonite Zip Tied to the shock sensor on the main harness. I would say only lazy people does that.   I fall into that category at a time early in my career when things got busy at the shop then I got lazy and simply zip tied it to the main harness, but now I screw mount the shock sensor to a solid surface no matter what. It’s a lot of work to screw mount the shock sensor then it is to put a zip tied around it. At the end of it I know that screw mount is the most effective way for me.

I have done a lot of jobs for customer with the requested of servicing false alarm in the middle of the night. 90% of the time I will find that’s it’s related to a faulty hood pin switch that have been bent from the mounting bracket so it gets grounded some of the time. Of the remaining percentage I get paid for installer error which would includes remounting the shock sensor to a solid surface. And yes, I will bring the customer in to look at the original install to see how it was mounted. Then I will remount the shock sensor to a solid surface. Later in the week I will have a follow up call to see if there was any improvement with my installation. With that, I am almost certain that I will get all future business from them and their acquaintances.

I am a probability guy and the fact that there has been more job given to me with a false alarm with the shock sensor on the harness have made me believe that a solid surface mount is much better, so I am sticking with that probability for the time being.   Personally I don’t think there is a great deal of differences between mounting the sensor to the main harness verse a solid surface. If you are the best at what you do it shouldn’t matter. If you have a lot of success with the harness by all means go for it and be the King of the main harness mount guy while me and Bretbowman and a few others will be the King of the solid surface mount guys.    For the do it yourseIfer out there, you can mount them however you like while for the rest of us professional here we have to argue between solid surface mount or main harness mount because the rest of the world don’t give a dame about our struggle and effort of our work, but are only concern with the result of a good install. Yes, that is correct. The world never looks at your effort just result.

“This forum is full of so many big headed, self righteous installers it's almost shocking.”

There are too many to say the least so don’t take it personnel and get jealous as they will only flatter themselves with your jealously.     



-------------
Be careful whose advice you buy, but be patient with those who supply it.posted_image




Posted By: bretbowman
Date Posted: March 17, 2005 at 8:29 PM
Very well put thepencil.  Probably couldn't have said it better myself.   posted_image

-------------
2002 Toyota Sequoia Limited 2WD (Clifford G5 Avantguard 5 w/ 2 SmartWindows modules) - IT Engineer - NRA Life Member - LDS Return Missionary - Married for time AND ETERNITY - Eternally sealed family




Posted By: JoshV
Date Posted: March 18, 2005 at 11:26 PM

I also agree with Bret-

  A shock sensor picks up vibration,   not movement.    The frame of the vehicle will have way more vibration than any wire harness in a car.         If you want false triggers when its windy then by all means zip tie that sucker to a wire harness because it will be moving along with the car.   

To each his own.    Do whatever you think is best.     But it seems if you get back to basics youll probably find good sense in why its better to mount to a solid part of the car. 





Posted By: nava94
Date Posted: March 19, 2005 at 12:42 PM
my opinion is to the frame of the car and if you have a limo for a car then use two shocks.




Posted By: bretbowman
Date Posted: March 20, 2005 at 11:21 AM

I'll tell you what... to keep an open mind, I'll mount mine to a large wire bundle and do some theoretic testing to see if it seems that the sensor is more sensitive.  I do think that I'll likely mount it back to the firewall under the dash, but I have no problem admitting if I'm wrong and will certainly keep the sensor wired to the harness if it seems that it's more sensitive there.

I just think that simple physics tells me that mounting to the body (or frame, even better) is going to give you the most even sensitivity throughout the whole car.  I don't see how it can be disputed that a wire harness, no matter how big, will absorb some of the vibration.  I'll post results later next week when I get around to this.   :)



-------------
2002 Toyota Sequoia Limited 2WD (Clifford G5 Avantguard 5 w/ 2 SmartWindows modules) - IT Engineer - NRA Life Member - LDS Return Missionary - Married for time AND ETERNITY - Eternally sealed family




Posted By: fordfAlcon
Date Posted: March 22, 2005 at 6:51 AM

hi all,

just thought id post this new info, i recently tested the output sensitivity on differnet parts of my car, a falcon and my girfreinds car a toyota celica (Smaller sportscar)  In my falcon sedan  (a larger Family car for those who have not heard lol) the best response for light contact ie someone opening their door onto the car or a cat jumping onto the car, out of five different locations was when it was mounted to a part of the steering column plastic cowling which protruded. (another great place is the Cabin roof in the center but involves removing lining, arrrgh dont do :<)To find this location i sat in the car and watched and felt for shock waves with my hand as wither someone threw my cat (wont come near me now lol). or literaly had a door touch the car (hence chip marks) Quiet clearly could i see the plastic covering vibrate almost like a tuning fork. where as in the Celica the best location was a steel dash mounting bracket inside the cabin of the car.

The locations for the falcon where: a) Firewall directly screwed on b) Ignition wiring harness above foot pedals c) The steering column itself Ziped tight onto a flatspot d) the cabin roof  e) above mentioned plastic. For the Celica a) steering Column b) Large wiring harness c) Cab roof d) Firewall e) Dash Mounting Bracket

Well thats my results anyway :) Thankyou



-------------
Screw The Rest FORDs tha Best!!!!!




Posted By: bretbowman
Date Posted: March 28, 2005 at 12:00 AM
There is no doubt that screwing the sensor into the firewall with FOUR mounting screws (one in each corner) is the best solution for greatest sensitivity.  This clearly yielded much greater results.

-------------
2002 Toyota Sequoia Limited 2WD (Clifford G5 Avantguard 5 w/ 2 SmartWindows modules) - IT Engineer - NRA Life Member - LDS Return Missionary - Married for time AND ETERNITY - Eternally sealed family




Posted By: bigpun78
Date Posted: March 28, 2005 at 12:30 AM
for me the steering column has been a great spot but if possable I always try to find a place in the center of the dash on a metal suface, I have heard that the harness works great too. It all depends one the vehicle you are working on.




Posted By: Hornshockey
Date Posted: March 29, 2005 at 3:55 PM
Bret the only problem I've run across (and I know I'm going to catch some crap for this) is that with code alarm brains, the shock sensor is internal, and with the size of the brain it is next to impossible to find a flat spot with that much area on the firewall. 

-------------
Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while; you could miss it.




Posted By: thepencil
Date Posted: March 30, 2005 at 9:44 AM
Again, there are some exceptions. Some car is next to impossible of finding a spot to put the alarm unit let alone a flat spot.

-------------
Be careful whose advice you buy, but be patient with those who supply it.posted_image





Print Page | Close Window