Ohms an amp sees when bridged

New to audio.  I'm looking at buying two smaller bridgeable amps instead of one large one to drive some mb quart components. 

A 2 channel amp, bridged, still sees only a 4-ohm load even though the power is increased, right?

Are there any disadvantages to doing this? 

Thinking of running an Xtant A2002 to each side of the PCE 6.5" mb's.

thanks!

My mistake!!!!!!!!!   I missed the part about components..

It there a reason you are wanting to run seperate amps????  You can get just good of quality, and just as much power from a single amp if you know what you are doing.

Well.  I'm considering a few 2 channel amps, but I'm mainly just concerned about price.  It seems that I might be able to run those 2 Xtant a2002 amps w/ 200 watts to each side of the components for much less than I can buy a clean 200x2 amp.

Thanks for any help or advice you can give!

Why not consider a clean 4 channel amp?  By the time you by a few inexpensive 2 channel amps, you could have gotten a high quality 4 channel.

Ok.  I read that site.  Just to clarify - each side of a component set (effectively one speaker) will still be seen as a 4-ohm load when bridged, right?

THanks

...Because everybody wants to get the most voltage, not the best specs.  That is evidenced on almost every post.  So people start to believe that wiring to reach full potential from the amp is a necessity, and that if you don't, then it means you just don't know how to do it right.  Components are best wired in stereo, and bridging should not be a consideration.

  Subs, on the other hand, are often bridged so that the two stereo signals are mixed as one mono signal.  This is used when only one sub is being driven, and very often used also when a stereo configuration could have been utilized. 

I would always think to wire in stereo first for subs; bridge only if it works out better.   And for components or any other drivers, wire only in stereo, one speaker per channel.