Thanks for the thanks.
I feel like the Devil's Advocate because I too say - in principle - that the alternator should exceed the amp rating. (Or rather, that batteries etc won't make up for an undersized alternator as far as keeping >13V is concerned. They will however extend the reserve time (available capacity), but they still need to be recharged (hence reduced amp current at the end of the driving session, or grid charging, etc.)
However that statement "
the alternator needs to match or beat the fuse rating of the amp" isn't strictly true, but hopefully my writings explain that (ie, if under 13V is okay, and the battery is recharged...).
But yeah - normally I argue the other way... "get a bigger alternator". I guess I just like giving the alternate scenarios or views - even if they are my own. (I constantly fight myself, but not as much as I fight back; hence I usually lose.)
Probably my best summary would be to prioritise the alternator, then worry about batteries. (Unless more batteries are needed to reduce (AGM) damaging current surges.)
Though the Big 3 should be #1 since that is required eventually, and in the mean time, it reduces voltage losses which IMO is never a bad thing.
[ Likewise, as big as practicable cables from the battery, or alternator, to the amp; especially ground which can be overlooked, and people often forget that grounds may be common with cranking, headlights, etc. Plus if the ground is from alternator to (engine to) chassis and battery to chassis, and then chassis to amp, they are only short lengths to double up on to halve its resistance (keeping in mind that that total ground resistance will be less than the +12V feed with the same gauge, so it's not as if you halve the total resistance - you just halve the ground resistance "cheaply". The again, if that resistance is negligible - but then I argue for ground redundancy - lose one ground and the other(s) should cover it. As I wrote, losing ground can be very expensive. Who had the Hummer with 7 DVD screens and burnt the lot out? Several $thousands worth of damage just by losing a ground. Losing the +12V is cheaper - things merely stop working. ]
Oh dear, repeating my same again? Or maybe emphasising, and with a different slant or extra case studies...?
6V batteries?
!! ??
Fine in terms of 2 big capacity 6Vs to get a big capacity 12V, though a 12V monoblock otherwise is better. (It's not like you can replace one 6V and not the other, though series is not as touchy as parallel, though one failed series 6V means the other gets far more than 6V, hence boiling (the heating, then fire?)
Ok - done with my due diligence info....
But I wanted to check that your aren't considering adding the 3rd 6V battery... It must be 12V that is added - in parallel.
That's probably obvious, but I have known people to add a 6V battery in series with 12V for 18V to boost output power (it works - the vehicle electrics burn far more powerfully than a mere 16V over-voltage!).
And I have known people with 2 series 6V to parallel one 6V with another thinking it will help. Whilst is does reduce the paralleled 6V effective resistance, you cannot recharge them; the current sufficient to charge the single battery is only half sufficient for the paralleled. Hence early failure of the parallel batteries, and over-voltage of the single battery. 3 failed batteries usually within days. And maybe a fire too.
Alas the later stuff above is obvious to many, but I understand the (flawed) logic. It reminds me of a kid that once connected 1.5V batteries in series with a little cassette... er, mp3 player to boost output. It was obvious logic at the time. Rumor has it that he or she now writes authoritatively (allegedly!) about batteries, battery isolators, and alternators. (So there is hope for some!)
As to Audis, geez man, I'm cool and I considered Audi! And that's not bad for someone with the same Car Marque since driving age (and still the same vintage LOL!). [Not that that is what makes me cool. it's just that my jumper is in the wash....]
Besides, I have seen some real hot looking Audis. I mean, cool looking. [ Unfortunately I no longer trust them. They released a model here some years back that was known to have a gearbox that would fail after about 6 months. Instead of the (allegedly!) guilty Agents getting justice, it was transferred to "industrial espionage" by 2 guys - namely the ones that raised the local alarm. Foisting crap on consumers - bad. Criminalising innocents (knowingly and deliberately IMO - unforgivable. ]
( Maybe moderators should cut that [last bit] out? It's not like I am one that normally publicises events like that.... )
But 12V in the engine bay, and an optional battery (but recommended for big systems) in the boot/trunk; irrespective is 2x6V + 1x12V or 4x6V etc, but each battery "matched" to the other one in its string (ie, series) if it's 6V.
And an isolator when not in use to avoid parallel battery interactions. Maybe the UIBI? (A relay controlled by the charge light or "is charging" signal - ie, off when not charging.) And with a high-impedance input MOSFET version on the horizon (at the moment it's 2 years closer to
that horizon LOL), I suspect easy configuration even for EMS controlled alternators (ie, DP etc types as opposed to traditional UIBI D+ or SL or SIL types.)
Dang! Even my short "thanks for the thanks" replies are long!
Best wishes.