the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
icon

SPL formula?


Post ReplyPost New Topic
< Prev Topic Next Topic >
Poormanq45 
Silver - Posts: 597
Silver spacespace
Joined: October 27, 2004
Location: United States
Posted: December 24, 2004 at 6:32 PM / IP Logged  
Is there a formula to calculate what the SPL will be?
I'm thinking tha tit would include:
Frequency, Cone/Swept Volume, Excursion
Is there anything else? To keep it kind of simple, lets assume that the diver is not in an enclosure.
So, is there a formula?
Alpine Guy 
Platinum - Posts: 2,478
Platinum spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: October 18, 2003
Location: Canada
Posted: December 24, 2004 at 10:48 PM / IP Logged  
im shure there is a formula, ,but it would take a physics professor/engineer about 500 equations to come close.
2003 Chevy Avalanche,Eclipse CD7000,Morel Elate 5,Adire Extremis,Alpine PDX-4.150, 15" TC-3000, 2 Alpine PDX-1.1000, 470Amp HO Alt.
haemphyst 
Platinum - Posts: 5,054
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Electrical Theory. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: January 19, 2003
Location: Michigan, Bouvet Island
Posted: December 24, 2004 at 11:57 PM / IP Logged  
a VERY GENERAL rule of thumb is this: A doubling of power will net a 3dB increase in output. This applies ONLY to a true infinite baffle loaded driver, and in an anechoic chamber. Boxed drivers, and automotive volumes all have a dramatic effect on the net efficiency, and maximum output of any driver in any given situation.
While it DOES require frequency, the others do not really come into play as much. You will have more output at resonance. Generally speaking, you simply take the Re (Reference efficiency) of the driver, and add 3 to that number for each doubling of power you will be applying to the driver.
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."
Poormanq45 
Silver - Posts: 597
Silver spacespace
Joined: October 27, 2004
Location: United States
Posted: December 25, 2004 at 8:14 PM / IP Logged  
So, there is no corelation between peak-to-peak excursion and SPL? I would think that a driver moving 2inchs peak-to-peak would put out a higher SPL then a driver of the same size/volume moving only 0.5 inch peak-to-peak.
Does anybody else have any info about my question? To me, it would seem feasable to get a really accurate equation for SPL based on a few factors.
Now as haemphyst said, resonance would screw up this calculation, but wouldn't it be semi-accurate else where in the frequency range?
Alpine Guy 
Platinum - Posts: 2,478
Platinum spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: October 18, 2003
Location: Canada
Posted: December 25, 2004 at 8:49 PM / IP Logged  
Yup, there is a corelation between excursion and spl, but it also has to do with the VC wireing, cone diameter, power requirements. All those fun factors.  But one of the biggest is the actual vehicle your putting the subs into.  1 sub in a suv can hit 130 db, ,while that same sub, same box, , everything the same in a car could hit 120db, , , so its really impossible to get close.
2003 Chevy Avalanche,Eclipse CD7000,Morel Elate 5,Adire Extremis,Alpine PDX-4.150, 15" TC-3000, 2 Alpine PDX-1.1000, 470Amp HO Alt.
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: December 26, 2004 at 11:38 AM / IP Logged  

I think there are two different discussions going on here.  One, what haemphyst was talking about, is SPL for a given driver and amount of power, raw SPL, if you will.  Haemphysts formula, minus some unknown variables, as he pointed out, is correct.

Two, is what poormanq started talking about, maximum SPL. 

It is simply incorrect to assume that a 2" peak to peak subwoofer will be louder than a lower excursion subwoofer.  As Alpine pointed out, there are MANY other variables that enter the calculation for both the lower excursion sub and the higher excursion sub.  Also, at this point, it is foolish to consider the raw driver itself, outside of the practical application of an enclosure.

High excursion has an effect on power handling, which ultimately effects maximum SPL.  Where one sub may reach its physical limits with 300w, a high excursion subwoofer might be able to handle 1200 watts.  While this might sound great, remember that physics doesn't allow free lunches.  In general that high excursion subwoofer is much less efficient and has less cone area because of its high excursion capability.   So, the puny 300w low excursion subwoofer will probably be LOUDER from 0-300 watts than the high excursion subwoofer in similar qtc enclosures.   

We've been having practical discussion about this in another thread.  Like Alpine and Haemphyst said, there are a lot of unknown variables to any final in-car SPL determination.  However, using some enclosure design software you can at least compare subwoofers against eachother.  To my knowledge this sort of software modeling is the only way to obtain the most complete picture, outside of actually trying it. 

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
auex 
Platinum - Posts: 5,041
Platinum spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: December 23, 2002
Location: Arizona, United States
Posted: December 26, 2004 at 11:56 AM / IP Logged  
You guys want to know the secret formula for SPL numbers?
YOU-$10.00+GUY WITH RTA=SPL measurement.
Certified Security Specialist
Always check info with a digital multimeter.
I promise to be good.
Tell Darwin I sent you.
I've been sick lately, sorry I won't be on much.
Poormanq45 
Silver - Posts: 597
Silver spacespace
Joined: October 27, 2004
Location: United States
Posted: December 26, 2004 at 1:40 PM / IP Logged  
Thans for the info kfr01, haemphyst, ans Alpine gy.
Ok, I understand that it is not possible to make a formula that works for different drivers in different enclosures, but is it possible to make a formula to calculate SPL based on excursion for single driver?
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: December 26, 2004 at 9:17 PM / IP Logged  

Poormanq45 wrote:
Thans for the info kfr01, haemphyst, ans Alpine gy.
Ok, I understand that it is not possible to make a formula that works for different drivers in different enclosures, but is it possible to make a formula to calculate SPL based on excursion for single driver?

No. 

Why are you so hung up on excursion?  Excursion can HURT maximum SPL just as easily as it can help it.  You need to look at the whole picture. 

Also, what would be the point of a free-air, no enclosure, maximum SPL rating?  Maximum SPL is LARGELY a function of the power fed to the subwoofer and the enclosure used.  I see no point at all to your idea.

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
haemphyst 
Platinum - Posts: 5,054
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Electrical Theory. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: January 19, 2003
Location: Michigan, Bouvet Island
Posted: December 26, 2004 at 11:27 PM / IP Logged  
You're right, kfr01... I have NEVER seen even a reasonable efficiency on a high excursion driver. Those damn laws of physics again... Output is a function of RATE OF CHANGE, not how MUCH change (which is what excursion would effect)... Excursion is presently the biggest killer of output there is. BTW, I would consider 91-93dB a reasonable output on a driver with 2 inches of pk-pk. Good luck finding ANYTHING close to that. My 9122 by Eclipse is specified at 87, and that is probably a bit optomistic. The Ti 10 from Eclipse was specified at 84, but when my buddy at Harman spec'd it out on the Klippel machine, it actually settled on 78! 78dB/w/m!!! THAT IS ABYSMAL!!!!
I have a few posts regarding this issue under my belt...
Try this...
Or this...
Read some of those posts, and see if that'll answer any of your questions a little better...
I STILL think, though, that with all the technology we have today, why can't we have a low Fs, decent efficiency, long Xmax driver? With NdFeB getting so cheap, why we can't stack about 10 pounds on a motor, and boost that efficiency... Steven?
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."
Page of 4

  Printable version Printable version Post ReplyPost New Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

  •  
Search the12volt.com
Follow the12volt.com Follow the12volt.com on Facebook
Friday, April 19, 2024 • Copyright © 1999-2024 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies
Disclaimer: *All information on this site ( the12volt.com ) is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular use. Any user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and use of this information. Please verify all wire colors and diagrams before applying any information.

Secured by Sectigo
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
Support the12volt.com
Top
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer