Eclipse Titanium vs Aluminum

Well i had all my stereo stolen over the holidays and just got my insurance check in, i have decided to run all eclipse and am going to put two tens in my extended cab toyota. Im torn as to which of the two to get. Wanted to here some of you guys opionions and comparisons.

Eclipse is the shiznit!! One of the best SQ subs (in right enclosures) I have ever heard. They do however need allot of power and our very underraged subs. I run the Eclipse SW8122DVC subs with my Eclipse DA7232 amp ( this is one bad ass amp that can put most to shame) and these subs pound.. My next vehicle will be a SUV in which I will be running the Eclipse 9100 series..Eclipse "Approaching Perfection"

I am running eclipse aluminum 10's. I love them as far as the SQ, But I think the low end still suffers a little. But alot of 10's I have ran have had trouble getting below 32hz and staying clean. When I ran them with 400RMS per sub In a vented enclosure we were able to pull a 142db on the term lab. Thats more then loud enough for street use2009 0-1000 Trunk WR 154.0DB 2009 1001+ Trunk WR

2007 USACI World Champion

2007 World Record

2006 USACI Finals 2nd Place

i agree, the aluminums are amazing. the only reason i would get the titaniums is that they will have much tighter bass because the cones are all that much more stiff. i havent heard the titaniums, but because the metal is so much stronger and able to be more thin, it can be less heavy and is one of the most ideal materials for a cone. the alums sound insane, so you might want to save the extra cash and get better comps, amps, or deck. you wont be dissapointed. both cones are very stiff, i doubt the weight diff will make that much of an improvement

For the small dollar difference between the 10's and 12's, consider the 12's. Eclipse =  Bump for the advice on a good alarm system like a Compustar 2WAMA.Top Secret, I can tell you but then my wife will kill me.

Alarm was the first thing I bought Compustar 2WSS-AS