the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
icon

which 8 to get


Post ReplyPost New Topic
< Prev Topic Next Topic >
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 11:50 PM / IP Logged  
Not to be critical. But I'm going to be critical. That "test" of 8" drivers was fairly worthless, imo.
At BEST I think that test shows us that using THOSE EXACT BOXES, in THOSE EXACT CARS will yield ROUGHLY those results.
Nothing more.
Am I being unfair? I've never heard of anyone swapping drivers in and out of the same boxes for testing, testing using the same amount of power each time (what the hell is that supposed to show us?), and testing in car (ooh look, cabin gain).
That test probably does more harm than good, to all the viewers that think it actually means they should buy driver X over driver Y based on that.
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
bullman96 
Silver - Posts: 294
Silver spacespace
Joined: October 03, 2004
Location: United States
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 11:53 PM / IP Logged  
and the sq test was a joke. i pity the people who let him use their drivers
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 11:57 PM / IP Logged  
No joke. "Here, run a worthless test on my drivers and push them to their limits while you're at it."
Don't tell me the other members of that board actually thought that was a worthwhile endeavor?
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
AJRXtreme 
Silver - Posts: 302
Silver spacespace
Joined: June 08, 2004
Location: United States
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 6:34 AM / IP Logged  
would wrathchild be better off going with a JBL300.1? instead of a 2 channel amp?
03 F150 on 24's
HU:Pioneer DVD5700
Frt:MC57
Subs:(12)S12L7
Amps:(3)KX2500.1's, MC-2004
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 2:27 PM / IP Logged  

Lloyd is an SPL guy, but he is very experienced at it.  I agree that they should have used the same alignment for each driver instead of the same enclosure.  That would have provided a much more accurate test.  But I believe it will give the original poster an idea of what the differences between all the drivers are.    That's why I provided the link.  I wouldn't say it is totally useless.

Steven Kephart

Adire Audio

kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 2:51 PM / IP Logged  

I think the multiple errors in testing compound to a point approaching uselessness.  I really don't know what good anyone can possibly hope to extract from that page.  The only portion of the page marginally useful, in my opinion, was when they made comments about the physical features, i.e. the tinsel leads are too close together, etc. 

Steve, what can the original poster gain regarding the differences between the drivers when the measured differences are inherently flawed because of the ill-executed testing measures?  You see real testing being done all the time at Adire, I assume.  How does this test compare?

Furthermore, I can just see these guys sitting around doing the 'SQ' test.  The results are probably completely opposite of what people would generally consider good sound quality.  I can just picture it, "dude, Korn hit extra hard on those (high distortion) subs, they have eleeeeet 'attack'."  I wonder if they even tried to level out the SPL level (NOT WATT LEVEL) before doing the 'SQ' test.  Research has shown that our minds prefer higher SPL when comparing two drivers.  Were the tests even blind?  Ranking the drivers by SPL at a given watt level - good job guys, way to rank the drivers by efficiency.  Hell, they didn't even do that since they used different alignments.  What did they even show? 

Am I being unfair?  What _did_ they do right?

To give them some credit, I applaud their efforts to TRY to help the community.  Next time they should take an extra 10 minutes to think things through.

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 4:50 PM / IP Logged  
kfr01 wrote:

Steve, what can the original poster gain regarding the differences between the drivers when the measured differences are inherently flawed because of the ill-executed testing measures?

 

Well the build differences was one thing.  Even though the frequency response graphs aren't too accurate due to differing alignments.  It does give an idea of which driver has better low end extention, or which driver will have a really peaky response.  I think the enclosure chosen was probably a good size for the test as most of them probably are designed for a similar size enclosure.  I wouldn't be surprised if the response is accurate to within a few dB.  the differences in the response graphs between many of the drivers was much larger than that. 

Here's a link to the discussion thread about that test: http://forum.soundillusions.net/showthread.php?t=45741&highlight=great+challenge  Here's an excerpt from Lloyd about the testing:

"I'm not gonna sit here and argue that the boxes chosen were perfect for each driver... however the majority of woofers tested, did have reccomended volumes that we met...

its up to the person whose looking for an 8, or 8's... take the evidence presented, and figure out what's germane to your situation...
the only drivers that tested in a box too small, which should limit output... was the W7, and Mikes Custom TC woofer... and both presented very damn well IMO...
by no means is the test a final and conclusive "THIS WOOFER IS BETTER" but considering how limited 8" comparsions are... anything helps which 8 to get - Page 2 -- posted image."

 

kfr01 wrote:
You see real testing being done all the time at Adire, I assume.  How does this test compare? 

Well not even close.  But then I wouldn't expect it to.  We have VERY expensive software and hardware designed for testing speakers.  But then it is much more important for us to have much tighter resolutions on our testing and be much more accurate.  To be honest, if they did have the equipment we have, I would be much more hessitant about their results.  This is because we find that people who try to use it don't know what they are doing and get inaccurate results or don't know how to read the results.  We had some people freak out on one forum because our Extremis driver had higher distortion than two other drivers at one frequency.  Of course they failed to notice that the distortion for all three drivers was well below 1% which is inaudible.  They also failed to see that we have much lower distortion numbers at levels where distortion does become audible. 

kfr01 wrote:
Furthermore, I can just see these guys sitting around doing the 'SQ' test.  The results are probably completely opposite of what people would generally consider good sound quality.  I can just picture it, "dude, Korn hit extra hard on those (high distortion) subs, they have eleeeeet 'attack'." 

Well if it helps, one of the guys who did the SQ testing was Nick Lemons, owner of Stereo Integrity (a small speaker manufacturer).  Also his dad installs pipe organs for one of the largest organ manufacturers.  He's a pretty good guy and seems to have a good ear.   

It's too bad our driver didn't make it to the SQ portion because I know it would have faired well.  But they greatly exceeded it's power handling on the SPL testing.  It only has a short coil, unlike all those SGLC drivers.

Steven Kephart

Adire Audio

kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 5:13 PM / IP Logged  
First, thanks for batting this around with me. I enjoy debate. :-)
I wonder if they re-attenuated the gain on the mains amplifier to match the varying less efficient subwoofers. Had they not done this I would throw the entire SQ test straight out the window.
About people figuring out the evidence: from the discussion regarding the test afterwards it is obvious there are many uninformed people -newbies- out there that might think this is some sort of determinative test - i.e. they think this _one piece_ of quite suspect evidence is _all_ the evidence. In my opinion the testers should have disclosed the shortcomings of their test more clearly.
But, once again, I do give them credit for trying. Please note, I'm not criticizing because it is fun - I'm criticizing to point out the limits of their test and hopefully encourage anyone attempting to conduct similar tests to either use tighter testing conditions or be more responsible with their disclosure.
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
wrathchild281 
Copper - Posts: 241
Copper spacespace
Joined: February 02, 2005
Location: United States
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 8:02 PM / IP Logged  
i am looking into the IDv.3 sub that or either the memphis mclass. but now why would i want to run it at 4 ohms instead of 2 ohms.
stevdart 
Platinum - Posts: 5,816
Platinum spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: January 24, 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Posted: February 03, 2005 at 9:24 PM / IP Logged  
Depends on whether you have a two-channel or a one-channel amp to power them.  Select subs that will wire to a total 4 ohms for the 2-channel (and bridge the channels).......to a total of 2 ohms for the 1-channel.  It comes out to 2 ohms/channel either way.  You'll find more of a selection in amps in that power output range with the 2-channels......like the MTX amp I linked to.
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
Page of 2

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

  Printable version Printable version Post ReplyPost New Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

  •  
Search the12volt.com
Follow the12volt.com Follow the12volt.com on Facebook
Saturday, May 10, 2025 • Copyright © 1999-2025 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies
Disclaimer: *All information on this site ( the12volt.com ) is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular use. Any user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and use of this information. Please verify all wire colors and diagrams before applying any information.

Secured by Sectigo
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
Support the12volt.com
Top
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer