geepherder wrote:
Sedate, just a slight correction- you stated that thickness doesn't matter. That's way too broad of a statement. Yes, many of us have built boxes out of 1/2 inch as well. But who hasn't seen a box that was ruined by using a material that's too weak, or thin? |
|
|
Geepherder, just a slight correction- I was completely correct in this assertion. Your extrapolations from my statements do not make them mine. I correctly asserted that RIGIDITY matters, not thickness... you need to think more abstractly. The ONLY materials available that would be rigid enough to withstand the compression waves of a sub must be inherently thick.. this does NOT mean that they're for the proper functioning of a sub, simply that they
are.
geepherder wrote:
Dave, you missed the point. The point was that his statement was too broad, and it could lead someone to believe that you could use 1/4 inch mdf. |
|
|
Maybe if this someone was the same sort who needs the "Not for use in Bathtubs" sticker on the hairdryer or the "Do not Collapse while occupied" on the baby stroller..
youngone wrote:
and im kind of pisset off that you called the statments people make retarded we are haveing a intelectuale argument we arent trying to put people down like somebody. and you also tryed put down stev. i realy dont like people that are smart but cant be polite and correct people in the right way. and i respeckd stevdart for his input and take it into acount and dayhon to they both now what they are talking about. |
|
|
Hmm. Okay its like this... I didn't so much put down stevdart as hold him accoutable for his "air in wood" comment. I'm sorry, I'll be the first to admit, stev is certainly a Jedi Master to my Padewan Learner, but he was seriously asleep at the keyboard on that one. He's gonna need to stand up and take one on the chin for that. Here, I'll call him on it:
stevdart: Your "air in the wood" statement was retarded.
I promise, he doesn't care.
See youngone, its not so much that I'm not able to be polite, its just that I find ascerbic mouthiness suits my personality so much more.
youngone wrote:
see they were polite in corecting you thanks guys |
|
|
Oh come on just LOOK at my posts! Look at yours! I can't help but have a modicum of smarminess! Believe me its my only release! If it makes you feel any better, IRL, I'm totally miserable. I mean seriously look what the hell I'm spending my Friday night doing.
To be honest youngone, I actually kinda get a kick out'a ur earnestness..
hamfist wrote:
An infinitely rigid material could be infinitely thin, and still be perfect for an enclosure, right? (I'll save some of you the thought process.) |
|
|
Ahh heamph! I was thinking earlier how cool it would be to invent this material and patent it! I mean, I really can't kid myself, I'm not that motivated... as much as I'd love to position myself competitively in the synthetic chemicals market and begin building myself a billion-dollar industrial empire with the "infithin-infirigid-inium"... eh..err... "sedatium" and begin selling like plastic and usher in an entire new era of synthetic materials.....
It'd be great and I'm sure enormously self-actualizing but I think I'd really just lazy myself out, whore the patent to DuPont for 8 figures a year and call it a day.. yea?
"I'm finished!" - Daniel Plainview