For giggles I wanted to see if it was possible or even plausable to blow a sub using a "small" amp. (or as I would have "mis"stated in the past...underpowering it).
I was convinced by some very well informed and knowlegeble people on this forum that it was not possible to blow a sub by "underpowering" it. I was stubborn at first to understand this as it was something I was told would happen often throughout my years in the industry, even though it really didn't make any sense.
Regardless of believing this shouldn't be possible, I decided to attempt to destroy a sub using an amp with a 10x less power rating then the subs power rating, crank it up, and see what happens.
First, here's the specs on the components used for the "experiment".
AMPLIFIER SPECIFICATIONS: Max Power output: 30W + 30W, RMS Power output: 15W + 15W (4ohm, 30Hz-20kHz, less than 1% THD) Frequency Response (-3dB) 10Hz - 45 kHz Damping factor (100 Hz) “More than 100”
SUBWOOFER SPECIFICATIONS HighEndurance Multi-Layer Voice Coil Deep Bumped Back Plate for Extreme Excursion Max. Power Handling: 300W, RMS Power Handling:150W Sensitivity (In Car): 90 dB SPL. Usable Freq. Response (In Car): ±5dB 45Hz-1500Hz Nominal Impedance: 4 Ohms
Terminal Connector: Screw (gold plated, quality) Kapton Voice Coil Rubber Surround
(I measured an Re of 3.8 ohms)
For the headunit I used an older JVC KDS580, preouts, with a 20a power supply.
For the amp I used a 150a power supply. This amp is really small, about the physical size of 2 cigarette packs. I only used 1 channel of it @ 4 ohm to the sub so the output should be 15watts rms, 30 watts max. I used a "y" adaptor to both RCA's to form a mono input or "mixed stereo" if you wish.
The sub was installed into an "optimized" vented 8'' enclosure.
What I did first was break out the old "My Disc", The Sheffield/Autosound 2000 test disc (yes I know it's ancient).
I set the volume on the deck to 50 (maxed out), loudness on, Bass and treble full up, and turned the gain all the way up on the amp.
For hours on end I ran sweeps (low and high distortion), square waves,bursts, correlated pink noise (20 to 20), warbles, individual 5 second frequencys from 10hz to 99hz and various dynamic music.
Not only did the sub handle it fine, it sounded pretty good on certain tracks...actually shaking things in the "lab" as it hit resonances. The sub was moving quite a bit at times, but nothing too excessive. I heard no bottoming out and smelled no voice coil. The amp however was getting warm/hot to the touch.
Once I got tired of all the "noise" I figured I would just let it play heavy bass music for the rest of the day or until something gave.
Something did. The amp basically took a dump. (please no "I told you so's", this is what I predicted and expected before I started the experiment, my hypothesis based on info I received from this forum)
The amp still operated but only at 3/4 to full volume...once you turned the volume down to a "comfortable" listening level, you could hear it breaking up pretty bad, at lower volume levels no audible info at all would come out of the amp. So I tossed it in the garbage.
Anyhow, aside from the physics and common sense standpoint, it appears conclusive to me that the amp did not have enough power to damage the sub no matter how hard I tried, in any way shape or form. The amp gave up way before this sub ever would have. The sub is still in perfect shape and always remained cool as a cucumber throughout the test, so to speak.
After that I Bridged the sub to the deck power (don't think that's a good idea, but I did it) and ran it the rest of the day along with 2- 6.5's at moderate levels. The deck, speakers and sub are all still fine, it actually sounded pretty good but I am about 100% sure if I cranked it up for any length of time, the decks outputs would have became toast.
Keep in mind this was not the most "scientific" of tests and I haven't verified personally if this also holds true for other types of transducers. But I believe it confirmed that what I have been told about using a low powered amp on a sub in the past is untrue. I was going to take other measurments and scope it but I saw no point. The sub was not doing anything acoustically or physically unusual or unexpected. (occasional audible distortion not too pleasing to the ear was about the worst scenerio)
What I also can conclude from this is when I witnessed first hand in the past subs being damaged by amplifiers I believed were too "underpowered", the opposite would seem logical. Those amps were too powerful, and probably rated unreliably.
So, this myth is busted. I also have an 8'' sub for sale...barely used. Any takers?