3-400 items... LOL! Yeah - I have non-too-common vehicles from the 1960s & 70s, even a rarish 1986 (Piazza/Impulse). Let's see - my Isuzu folder has... thinking... counting... 11.5Gbytes under it. (That doesn't include /forums nor /batteries...) And one day I might continue my conversion of paper notes to soft documents... Yeah, one day and a half!
Now, audio... Oh crap - where do I start?
Firstly - upping idle speed... naughty naughty green house gases (I have to write you the Riot Act), but I am obviously dealing with someone smart enough to know to do that to ensure charging. (IOW - yeah man, I respect you already - so that makes two naughty boys!)
Though you may not always have to charge above eg 13V etc - the charging/driving
profile may be enough to recharge the battery. But then there is whatever voltage you need/desire for the amp output, but more ion that below...
Audio - I read so much crap about powering audio systems, especially on audio forums. But not all or not always - some IMHO have the right info. (And the "experienced" people I meet seem to know the same...)
But f.ex - those that reckon get a bigger (or more) battery(s) INSTEAD of up-sizing the alternator...
If the alternator isn't replacing lost charge, more battery merely extends
reserve time. How will that be recharged? A wall outlet, or driving without LOUD for a while?
And if a higher voltage means a higher output power, then ytf would they want to run on batteries (12.6V and lower) instead of the alternator at say 14.4V? If voltage means power, then the power at 14.4V compared to 12.6V is 30% higher! [ IE - (14.4/12.6)**2 = 1.30. That's from P = V**2/R where "**2" aka "^2" means squared; ie, V^2 = V**2 = V*V or VV (V times V) - InOtherWords Power is proportional to VV. ] [PS - sorry for the math! But that's FYI, DIY, etc...]
But IMO there is one typical contradiction.... If it's a
high power amplifier, then it must be using an SMPS. IE - a Switched Mode Power Supply to convert to a higher voltage.
[ For a 12V system, "high power" means an output greater than about 200W into 1 Ohm. That again is from P = VV/R, eg: (14.4V x 14.4V / 1 Ohm) = 207W being the max power possible into 1 Ohm at 14.4V with 100% efficiency. ]
1200W into 1 Ohm means VV = 1200W/1 = 1200, hence V = 1200^(0.5) aka v1200 (the square-root of 1200) = 34.6 = 35V. (Sanity check: VV/R = P = 35V x 35V / 1Ohm = 1225W.)
So, for 1200W into 1Ohm, you need at least a 35V supply. You don't get 35V from a 12V system without SMPS. (At least, not practically for high currents...)
But SMPS can typically have a range of input voltage, bit not the output. That 1200W output should be fixed at (say) 35V. It might be 36V or 38V in practice to allow for output transistor or FET voltage drops, but it should be a fixed or constant set voltage. [ That might be a bit technical, but in my experience, SMPS are fixed outputs. EG: dc-dc converters (as used in amplifiers) might have an 8VDC to 16VDC input range but will provide a fixed 12V or 19V etc for laptops etc. Same with AC inputs - a shaver or PC SMPS may take 110VAC to 260VAC but provide fixed 5VDC & 12VDC etc outputs. ]
Anyhow, that SMPS versus "linear" behavior contradiction is one for the audio or amp buffs to figure out, or explain to me if they have a rational answer. (Sorry, but don't use max current input unless you can explain the varying output! I've killed that one before too.)
I see many amps that claim higher output power with increasing voltage. In fact, they seem to be totally resistive - ie, from P~VV, Power at 18V compared to 16V will be (18x18/(16x16)) = 1.265625 = (26.5625 = ) 27% higher.
In that case, although IMO they are not simply an SMPS, they then do want a higher input voltage.
So ytf to so many advise more battery rather than an bigger alternator? Have they already reached their 250A or 350A alternator limit and can't add any more?
Or why not use 7-cell batteries? (Ok, so some comps ban them...)
Then there is the strange contradiction where caps REDUCE peak SPL, yet they advise AGM batteries near the amps. Why AGM? Because they have lower ESR than flooded cells. Why use caps - because they too have low ESR. So why not use flooded cells near the amp if you want higher peak SPL? (Sure - must be in a
sealed vented enclosure.)
Oh yeah - I forgot - lower ESR means "faster" supply of current.... Everyone knows that higher resistance slows down electricity... (NOT!)
And apparently low ESR is so important, yet they swap their cranking battery for an expensive low ESR type, and then have 3m (10') of 4G to the amp which has almost as much resistance as the AGMs internal resistance (~ESR). Add the ground resistance to that.... (And many claim that chassis/body resistance is higher than a fat cable...)
Furthermore, many reckon an AGM cranking battery will not last as long as an equivalent flooded battery (for daily use etc, and somewhat dependent on what "equivalence" means), so why not keep the original flooded cranking battery? If adding an AGM, then for Pete's sake, ADD it - and as near the amp or target as possible; don't substitute the distant standard (or flooded) cranking battery.
Then there is this deep-cycle versus cranking situation.
Deep cycle usually means a slow but DEEP discharge - as with camping, solar etc.
Sure, they might be able to supply high currents, but it stresses their lesser plate area.
Crankers however have thinner but more plates, hence a larger surface area able to supply higher currents. But thinner plates do not like DEEP discharge.
Their application can be interchanged, but at the expense of life.
Of course, there are those that are suited to both deep cycle and cranking - they have more AND thicker plates - and are still the same size and weight as dedicated deeps & cranks of the same rating. (IOW - yeah, right. IMO they are a compromise, else a deep cycle that is big enough to supply a high current which is enough for "cranking".)
Maybe audio buffs use deep cycle because they want maximum time on one battery without charging.
Personally I'd probably rather 2 crankers that can supply high current with less stress, and then provide similar reserve time - and tolerate a much higher recharge rate.
But in terms of current stress, maybe 2 deep cycles instead overcome that issue...
So may POVs. So many arguments.
IMO so many contradictions UNLESS they are talking about specific circumstances. Some obviously have no concern for battery life (ie, cost); others do and spend more up front but less over time.
Are batteries like people's backs? It's the straw that breaks them... you may have lifted engine blocks for years, then you lift a drink bottle and BANG! If two lifted those blocks, you'd still be drinking....?
I know the above may not be helpful, but it may indicate why IMO people need to think about what it is they want, and then specify that to us (or just me?).
LOL - I think of another the12volt poster wanting a 4kW design, then claiming success with much cheaper standby AGMs (ie - not for cyclic use) before he has even used them - and even then, no where near a 4kW system! And he was so worried about the right wall charger, yet expected to only need to charge them ONCE a month (not once per use or cycle!) - ytf would he need a charger.... equalisation; for AGMs?
But I hear the sun in Florida is pretty strong these days....
And BTW - I'm not having a go at you. Like I said, you have already demonstrated an understanding for the need for a charging alternator. Did I mention bigger batteries instead of an alternator...?
Yep - there I go venting again.
Now, the easy part - the charge light. Maybe look at
oldspark battery bank w/possible solar (2nd page) about 7th reply down where I link to the same diagram in 3 different the12volt threads.
I've been meaning to combine & update UIBI and related charge-light threads for ages - there are bits everywhere including at mp3car.com.
And I have lost track of where the latest diagrams etc are - I suspect now they are in emails unless I am thinking of some off-air ones (not on public forums). I thought I had much newer stuff here on the12volt.
That
oldspark battery bank w/possible solar thread has lots of my ramble with my last (on page 3) linking to
Car and Deep Cycle Battery Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 2011 (English Version) - especially the
Battery.Zip download - that's a great battery resource. It should be consistent with what I wrote above, but some stuff (like NOT keeping batteries paralleled) is beyond BatteryFAQs scope, though it is referred to albeit implicitly, or through links elsewhere.
Ah yes, another short reply....