I have been perplexed for some time now. Why is it a growing trend to attempt to engineer sub boxes that are not capable of high output at low frequencies? From what I have seen many people are building enclosures that rely on the vehicles transfer function to bring the low end response to an equal level for a flat response. Of coarse there is a definite rise, but its not as predicted.
Here are a few problems that I see with this thinking.
1. By limiting a subs acoustic output at low frequencies you are also eliminating any Acoustic head room. I guess this is fine if you never plan to use any kind of bass control. Ever!
2. In order to achieve a theoretical flat in car response, people are using subs that have high resonance frequencies. This means that you are expecting your sub to perform accurately well below resonance. Unless you own your own Kippel distortion analyzer you can not accurately predict just how severely out of wack your phase response will be. Bl and consequently Qts is not constant at high power levels. Enclosure modeling programs have there limitations and this is one of them.
3. The theoretical 12 db per octave rise due to cabin loading dose not exist. Due to various panels flexing and responding at various frequencies, as well as trunks and foot wells and wind shields all interacting acoustically this is not an exact science. Its not even a good science. I always measure a vehicles transfer function before building a serious enclosure (hundreds) and I know from first hand experience that this generic rise is GOPy (Good enough On Paper)
If accuracy is what you are after, your best bet is to perform an actual in car measurement to determine the transfer function. Look closely at your software most let you do this. Then design your enclosure taking that information into account. Designing in this manner will enable you to achieve a sub system that has better cone excursion, phase, group delay, frequency, and output abilities. As a bonus you are likely to end up with a good amount of efficiency and acoustic head room (when did that become a bad thing?). This will allow you to crank up the bass when you want to (or not you decide) and the cannon shots in the 1812th overture will not destroy your sub.
The solution to flat frequency response over the pass band is careful planning and making good use of an equalizer. Its not difficult to bring those peaks down with moderate adjustments.
Remember that a box program is just a big hand calculator, and thank God for them. But if you are attempting to make a science out of this stuff you have to keep in mind the variables outside of your software and account for them. The 12 db rise utility that most box programs have is a valuable tool. I use it. As a guide, but that’s the extent of it.
I wish I had a buck for every person that I have seen design or purchase one of these boxes only to cry an moan that it dose not have the sound that they were looking for.
That’s my piece.