Hi Rooty,
Sigma switches - cute!
I presume type D (on-off-on SPDT) or P (same but DPDT) - unless you want on/off/momentary-on N SPDT or R DPDT). Type 4 or 5. 12V lamps.
Lens color(s) to suit. Mabe a 260P-5BBRU12
I like the mixed color possibility - ie, red for "on with ignition" and blue or green "on with hi beam". That covers my concern earlier - being on with headlights off or dipped.
The only thing I can't see is how the switch lamps are terminated (usually to ground) - there should be a terminal(s) for them...
But looking for switches - ha - where are they?
I can't even find the big square red & green illuminated push buttons I used years ago in my car (the oil pressure light triggered a 2-second timer to kill the ignition and lit the two (flashing) buttons. Red killed the engine, green overrode the timer keeping the engine running.)
I think the Sigma is the way to go - I find nothing comparable in my local catalogs - unless splitting into 2 separate switches (as per my suggestion above - #1 is with hi-beam else off; #2 is bypass - ie, on with ignition no matter what). Then there are some lit $4 12mm round push-buttons (that probably need a separate ~680Ohm 1/2Watt resistor for their LED) from Altronics (at these links) (
red,
green, or
amber; flat-side 18mm round mounting - aka 15mm round with extended ends, or larger $14 24x18mm rectangular lit pushbuttons with 16mm diameter mounting ie -
red,
green,
orange,
white - with
12V spare globes for $3.55. (Note the latter all picture orange lenses, and "alternate" means "not momentary".]
But for easy spade connectors, integral 12V bulbs etc.... nah?
Maybe contact Sigma direct? Maybe my google is faulty - I found the odd switch here & there - eg, the American RV Company's black 3-pos rocker
ebaymotors - or try
http:///American-RV-Company if that link doesn't work - and their switch mounting panels, but nothing else.
Or maybe
the12volt.com, though I only find Sigma alarms etc there...
As to the circuit and legalities, in short, I think both are fine.
And thanks - good stuff those Montana Codes (and the Sigma link!).
As with almost any regulation anywhere, they seem to have the same intent, but as usual, differ in wording. (ha ha!)
But as I see it, although you "can" automatically control the lamps, you can also manually control them. Or rather - based on those two references only, there is nothing prohibiting your manual control of the driving lights. Cool!
The rest is whether or not you do NOT turn off the driving lights in certain situations. But in "normal" operation, yours will dip with the hi-beams etc so that is nothing new....
And you can have them off with hi-beams. That obviously isn't a issue.
It's only if on by themselves in certain situations (or if 42 inches above the ground) that there are issues.
But that can have interesting interpretations.... I'll put some as an addendum below.
Besides, you mentioned truck. If you are what we call a trucker, then even here you would probably be a "better than most" professional, concerned and courteous driver, and you would NOT have badly aimed or misused lights etc.
And dare I say that being stateside, you do not have the untrained discourteous poorly skilled drivers that we have here. (Our license tests are measured in minutes.)
Anyhow, that's it.
You seem only to have the typical installers problem - the parts, the fitting etc. The circuit is the easy part (for some of us). (As I say, "Sure! - I'll wire up your system - as long as you have all the bits in place first".)
Regards,
OldFart.
ADDENDUM (read only for legal or other amusement):
First a BIG caveat - I do NOT know the LEGAL definitions of your regulations - they will differ to ours, so I could be way wrong.
And some pre-ramble.... I'll put my barrister wig on.
[FYI: We have solicitors for the usual legal work, and barristers for the court representation. This creates extra jobs and income. I prefer a prostitute that can also serve coffee - ie, a "solicitater" with barista qualifications, but social reform and my humor are beyond the scope of this reply.]
We use "Shall" meaning "Mandatory"; "can" and "may" mean just that - "might" and "optional" etc.)
The Montana Code(s) seem to use may as "mandatory", but elsewhere as "can". But maybe your "may" means "must & mandatory" etc
61-9-220 uses several musts and one(?) can, and one may as in "
....use, and may not otherwise be lighted" (2nd last sentence. They seem straightforward with must & may as mandatory and can as optional.
But here it could be argued that the "may" is optional and is merely a statement of information - especially since that part stands on its own - ie, the comma separates it from the rest of the sentence.
[FYI - here someone Willed their estate "to Tom, Dick & Harriet". So each got 1/3rd? No! Tom got half. Dick & Harriet got half (1/4 each). If equal split was intended, it would have said "Tom, Dick, and Harriet" - the comma-and splitting the 3 entities, and breaking English rules of grammar. BTW - both our English & Legal definition of "or" now coincide - "or" officially means "and/or" - so never again need we right &/or or and/or.]
Now for the gritty:
"
An auxiliary driving lamp may not be used as a substitute for headlamps or lighted at any time the headlamps are required to be on in the low-beam position. "
If your may is optional, you can ignore that regulation.
But I expect "
may not be used" is mandatory (ie - our "Shall not me used") and I would expect Montana Law to specify that (somewhere, somehow - maybe by precedent).
But "
... or lighted any time the headlamps are required to be on in the low-beam position" - so you can have low-beam on with highbeam when low-beam are NOT required to be on (ie, dipper in hi position). Sorry - that's useless for you, but it covers my old situation, and modern cars.
"
An auxiliary driving lamp may not be..." - but both can be? Does an mean one? If not, why didn't they say "Any"? So you can use just the driving lights at anytime?
But if approaching another MOVING vehicle, you must turn "a" driving light off (not both?). But you don't have to turn it or both off if the other vehicle is stationary, or if you are stationary and the vehicle approaches you. IE - from "
A motor vehicle may not be equipped with more than two spot lamps and a lighted spot lamp must be turned off upon approaching another moving vehicle from either direction.
Ah, the fun of semantics.
Here many cases fail on such semantics. One precendent is that it is the
intent of the rule or law etc - you can't get off on a mere technicality (unless reasonably proven that the interpretation was reasonable for a reasonable person etc etc...).
And many non-legal people fail to understand legal jargon etc. It's a bit like contract law - forget what you THINK it says or means - what DOES IT actually say? ("Oh - but surely our Prime-Minister meant...." LOL!)