the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
icon

digital interface/protocols?


Post ReplyPost New Topic
< Prev Topic Next Topic >
loneranger 
Copper - Posts: 572
Copper spacespace
Joined: December 28, 2008
Posted: January 03, 2009 at 7:49 PM / IP Logged  

I'm new to the CAN scene. I was a proffesional mobile technician for ~10 years up until ~1995. I would now consider my self a semi-professional, since I've been away from the industry for so long. Back then, it was pretty much all analog(w2w). However, I would like some knowledge about the interface/protocols that are being used by the aftermarket alarm manufacturers, for communication between their products and others. What are the different interface/protocols being used and what are their names? What are their compatibilties with other manufacturers interface/protocols and any issues? I've tried to do as much specific research on my own(2 weeks) but, there isn't much that I've found. If you want to be either very technical or completely vague, I'm ok with that. I know some techs hold onto their knowledge like a patent and won't license it. digital interface/protocols? -- posted image. I never did that. My brief encounter here in the forums lends me to believe the vast majority of techs here don't either. Otherwise, why would they be here. If you just want to point me to links, I'm fine with that too. I've probably already read them though. digital interface/protocols? -- posted image. Give it a shot anyway. if you feel the need.

Within the next couple of days to week, I'm going to install(R/S K/E) either a Viper 5301 or 5501 into my 2002 Honda CRV, that is originally equipped with keyless entry and an immobilizer. I going to do this as inexpensively as possible and will not sacrifice security(no key and digital). I've seen at least 2 different interface/prototcols, if I'm not mistaken. I believe one is called D2D/DBI that is used by DEI. I'm not sure if this and the others are proprietary or some CAN derivative. I like what I've seen though, as far as the capabilities of these aftermarket modules and their vehicle integrations. Based on my specific vehicle though, there isn't much integration. digital interface/protocols? -- posted image. However, it's old so I understand. Of the applications I've seen, I found 3 modules that I'm leaning towards(Honda SL3, TBSL-HA, and PKH34). My understanding is only one(PKH34) of these provides a more secure installation(disables analog communication) when using the D2D port. It may also be the only one compatible with DEI products, hence my reason for the topic of this thread. I believe it could be made even more secure, if there was some sort of unique(un-cloanable) encrypted communication as well? Of course, if you see any errors in my ways, please feel free to correct me.

Basically, helping to answer the first paragraph would give me the information I need to understand the architectures used today and the confidence that my products, whatever they may finally be, will work properly together with my given knowledge.

TIA for your time. -LR

tedmond 
Gold - Posts: 4,610
Gold spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Security and Convenience. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: January 06, 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posted: January 03, 2009 at 9:02 PM / IP Logged  

What are the different interface/protocols being used and what are their names? What are their compatibilties with other manufacturers interface/protocols and any issues?

there are many out there. try to grab any of the following bypasses.

Fortin, Bypasskits, iDataLink. for the 02 i dont think you will need a canbus unit since most wires would be at the ignition, driver/pass kick and maybe door. i havent had any real issues with digital interfaces but had issues with the honda-sl3 programming, but i realised i missed one wire. also the tach wire output on the units reallly suck. i wrote something awhile back about this issue. most units will now have d2d or datacontrolled wire(saves time) but i still prefer to hardwire all outputs to bypass interface to prevent ant faults through data wire. im sorry if i confused you. if you got more q's feel free to ask.

loneranger 
Copper - Posts: 572
Copper spacespace
Joined: December 28, 2008
Posted: January 03, 2009 at 9:50 PM / IP Logged  

Thank for the reply. 

The thread was not how integrate or install modules into a vehicle, nor how to integrate or install RS/alarms into a vehicle. I very competent at this exercise, knowledgeable about the wiring for vehicles, and understand what is available on the buses the in different vehicles. This thread was mainly to get knowledge of the various interface/protocols used to integrate the various products together, that are offered by aftermarket accessory and alarm manufacturers.

djfearny2 
Silver - Posts: 810
Silver spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: September 23, 2002
Location: United States
Posted: January 03, 2009 at 10:05 PM / IP Logged  
some basics are can bus, which now adays controls the acc, door trigger status, immobilizer bypass etc. output for most cars like audio, vw, dodge, and many more, you have databus, gm lan, however again canbus is starting to be the new trend as it is the most reliable and effective thus far.
a little history, now with these systems car manufactors have the ability to diagnose problems faster than ever before. also to allow onboard computers to be more sophistacated adn monitor a lot more details.
Jon
Installer/Help Technician
---coral springs florida---
mecp certification is not always needed. I have it and it has not helped me out at all. my experience out shines it.
djfearny2 
Silver - Posts: 810
Silver spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: September 23, 2002
Location: United States
Posted: January 03, 2009 at 10:11 PM / IP Logged  
and sorry btw,
your honda does not incororate canbus. your door locks are standard ground triggers the car has an chipped key so you will need to get a bypass for that. some optuons are 556uw which you probably know is a hide a key, waiste))) or you can go with an xk05 from bypasskits.com you will more than likey have to get it programmed from someone with a bootloader. but the xk05 is just for key bypass the door locks and triggers etc need to be W2R connected.
Jon
Installer/Help Technician
---coral springs florida---
mecp certification is not always needed. I have it and it has not helped me out at all. my experience out shines it.
loneranger 
Copper - Posts: 572
Copper spacespace
Joined: December 28, 2008
Posted: January 03, 2009 at 11:52 PM / IP Logged  

Thanks for your reply. I really appreciate your input djfearny2, as well as yours tedmond. Everyone can gleen some information from almost any reply. I hope neither of you took/take any offense to my replies.

I may be new to the CAN scene but, I'm completely competent about the CAN concept. I'm not an expert mind you but, any information I need on CAN is available, as it's a industry standard. I am professionally knowledgable about vehicle wiring, whether it be analog or digital. I know what is available for integration into vehicles and how it is integrated into those vehicles. I used my scenario in my opening post as a way of explaining where a past mobile electronics technician who may be coming into the industry again is left, in regards to knowledge about the aftermarket alarm and alarm accessories industries internal integration. There really seems to be no source of information about this, even from the vendors themselves. I guess I need to clarify this thread more. It's not about integration into the vehicle.

This thread is mainly about the proprietary interface/protocols created and used by the aftermarket alarm and alarm accessories manufacturers, to integrate their products together and their cross-compatibility with others. Specifically, their naming schemes, their compatibility with other manufacturers, and any issues that may arise when integrated together. Current mobile electronics technicians themselves must come across this scenario daily.

Note: I wish there was an edit feature in these forums!

howie ll 
Pot Metal - Posts: 16,466
Pot Metal spacespace
Joined: January 09, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: January 04, 2009 at 4:23 AM / IP Logged  
Yes we do it's frustrating but apart from the need for interfaces we are all at sea here. Don't confuse CAN with data and multiplex (resistive) they are all different systems, also a problem is that for instance, VW/Audi will change the protocols every couple of years. As a general rule, forget CAN on Japanese/Korean cars except for the last two years, as Ted says YOUR vehicle is pretty straight forward, the only part you would need would be a transponder by-pass. Read the posts and see what the pros and the smart youngsters tike Ted are using.
chriswallace187 
Gold - Posts: 1,661
Gold spacespace
Joined: March 11, 2002
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Posted: January 04, 2009 at 5:42 PM / IP Logged  
Loneranger, there is an edit feature, but it's limited to members with 50 or more posts I believe.
I get what you're saying. I wrote a bit on the subject the other day, incidentally.
From what I'm gathering (and I'm a bit behind too in that all of my installs have been wire-to-wire connection between modules), all of the data connections from remote start/alarm/combo units and data vehicle interface modules are 4-pin RS232. However from what I understand of RS232, it's only a specification for the connectors and has nothing to do with the data itself to be transferred.
As far as the actual data protocol I haven't got a clear answer myself. If you notice in my linked post, there are 3 companies making D2D interfaces(Fortin, Idatalink, Bypasskit). I can't say for sure that they have agreed on a common data protocol from module to module (obviously CAN, J1850, etc. are all industry standards not limited to aftermarket car electronics). Some speculation:
Code Alarm, an Audiovox brand, offers these interface modules, which are rebadged Bypasskit modules.
Audiovox's tech services site, however, has a "FlashLogic" pull down menu with 2 separate options, one marked "Generation 1" which goes to the "Xpressdownload" (Bypasskit) site, and another marked "Generation 2" which goes to this site(Idatalink).
This to me suggests that at least Idatalink and Bypasskit share a D2D protocol, though I can't say about Fortin. I'd really appreciate it if someone who knows more than me could chime in on the subject.
C Renner's Auto Electronix
My service is cheap, quick, and good - pick any two
howie ll 
Pot Metal - Posts: 16,466
Pot Metal spacespace
Joined: January 09, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: January 04, 2009 at 6:02 PM / IP Logged  
Chris the problem is you and I , wouldn't say know more but we are all struggling because no -one tells us anything, my post this week about Peogeots was simply that as per usual I ended up telling DEI how to do it! It's left to people like us to work it out, trouble is we have to pay the bils when we get it wrong. The dealer's here are a waste of time unless you contract to them, they know nothing, certain CAN conversion kits, no names arfe I gather a waste of time, they just don't do what they are supposed to do and I still prefer hard wiring because somewhere that CAN/data etc is going to come out of a control unit as 12volts+ or-!!.  An example is picking up the VSS on late Mercedes, all the text books give you CAN high low either at the gearbox management or ign switch BUT pin one usualy blank on the traction control is an analogue, I'm not sure of the reliability factor of all these processors, the manufacturers only do it to save weight to decrease fuel consumption and the copper wire saved plus easier diagnostics. To take this to it's giddy and rather ironic conclusion, there are 8 CH47 helicopters sitting uselessly in a field in England. They are much needed in Afghanistan but Boeing haven't released the servicing software!
howie ll 
Pot Metal - Posts: 16,466
Pot Metal spacespace
Joined: January 09, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: January 04, 2009 at 6:05 PM / IP Logged  
I owe an apology on my last post, let's give credit to young Ted, Mr. Luongo, I am an idiot and CKeeler who coiuld all probably work this out.
Page of 2

  Printable version Printable version Post ReplyPost New Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

  •  
Search the12volt.com
Follow the12volt.com Follow the12volt.com on Facebook
Thursday, April 25, 2024 • Copyright © 1999-2024 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies
Disclaimer: *All information on this site ( the12volt.com ) is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular use. Any user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and use of this information. Please verify all wire colors and diagrams before applying any information.

Secured by Sectigo
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
Support the12volt.com
Top
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer