amplifer selection

yeah yeah component, just wondering exactly what u meant by component and specifications which sounds a lot like passive crossover w/ set specs, already set.  between hu and amp aren't u cascading crossovers?  what hu do u have.  is complexitity and expense what your after, not me, simplicity and quality(in which case active would b the better choice)(for me, u, and prob. evry1 else)  sory can't think gotta run...

cadenceclipse wrote: yeah yeah component, just wondering exactly what u meant by component and specifications which sounds a lot like passive crossover w/ set specs, already set.  between hu and amp aren't u cascading crossovers?  what hu do u have.  is complexitity and expense what your after, not me, simplicity and quality(in which case active would b the better choice)(for me, u, and prob. evry1 else)  sory can't think gotta run...

Wha...? The ONLY thing in any of that, that made ANY sense was the part about cascading crossovers, which I'm not (IIRC). My deck's sub out runs full range (and if there is a cascade there, the deck's frequency is as HIGH as possible, so there isn't any "stacking") with the crossover doing all of the filtering functions. My head is the Alpine IVA-W205. Specifically, complexity and expense is what is necessary to achieve what I want, I'd do it the easy way if I could...It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."