forbidden wrote:
I think it's best to let us all know if you are in fact a person who has an direct relations to a manufacturer who is in fact trying to cram their companies beliefs down our throats, or are you the customers know it all best friend? |
|
|
I'm a longtime enthusiast, and more recently a forum participant and moderator...
I am currently cofounder/VP of a new startup R&D and manufacturing company in the car audio field, currently working with buildhouses and engineers to shape what will be our first lines.
I'm certainly not "cramming any company's beliefs down anyone's throat", and I'm not advocating any company's products over any others... particularly not mine - we don't have product available at this point regardless.
Stephen is simply a fellow forum participant - and seems to be a very intelligent one at that. We've never met, although I'd be glad to.
forbidden wrote:
If you are a manufacturer then I'm sure that we are all aware that no product is the best product for all applications, and that they all work differently in different applications or does your equipment work the best in all applications, a pretty arrogant assumption for arrogant replies like yours. |
|
|
Based on my replies -
objectively and painstakingly correcting the many inaccuracies, inconsistancies, myths, and downright untruths of your posts, taking time to quantify exceptions and details - you would conclude that I am the sort of person who would argue that one size fits all?
lol...
One size may fit most... or it may not. It's an important distinction, and it's situational.
(and what's the relevance, anyway?)
These are ironic (and emotionally charged) comments, as your original post would lead a reader to believe that they should - as a generalization - perform their install in the manner which you described.
My comments were in fact in pointing out that - as a generalization - these techniques were not to the end of the goal that you were claiming, and also that your conclusions that led to these techniques were also - as a generalization - flawed... and in fact the techniques that you were mentioning, if applied - particularly as a generalization - by an enthusiast, they would actually be counterproductive.
There's a large distinction to be made, also, between arrogance and objectivity...
Arrogance is the an undue faith in one's own knowledge, often evidenced by an overbearing pride and condescending manner
Objectivity is the application of other's knowledge, judgment based on observable phenomena, with sources that can be backed up either culturally or literarily.
Interestingly --- many of your claims seem unfounded... you've stated numerous times in this one thread how many numerous years of experience you have... and now you reply to my posts with a very condescending attitude, throwing personal attacks (I am pleased that you found nothing objective to refute of my posts)...
I would say that it is not me that is posting "arrogant assumptions and arrogant replies".
forbidden wrote:
...but now you wouldn't be privy to that information would you? |
|
|
That's the thing... when you are dealing with facts and truths, everyone is on the same page.
No one needs to be "privy" to the source of anyone else's information, because if it is truly the truth, it will be the same truth, the same end result.
So - I solidly believe you should question strongly any information that you have that counters essentially what the "rest of the world" believes to be the truth, because most likely that information is a misunderstanding, or a misconclusion.
Look at the possible points where you may have jumped to conclusion, rather than arrived at it.
forbidden wrote:
Keep going on your path guys, I'll keep going on mine and I'm pretty sure that our paths won't cross. While I have always stated that I continually learn new things everday, I for one do not profess to know everything, unlike you, oh it must hurt you to be wrong now doesn't it! |
|
|
The wonderful thing about integrity is that it is a powerful personal shield - no rebuttals necessary.
The wonderful thing about objectivity is that it is a wonderful fuel for integrity.
I certainly don't know everything, I sure don't profess to... if I only post on topics that I can contribute postively to - that is much different...
I was fortunate to have spent a good deal of time in Las Vegas this past week talking to some
real gurus after SEMA show hours, posing questions, filling in newly found voids and creating even more.
Be thirsty for information, but also be willing to question and drop any of your existing information in favor of the new - because particularly in the past few years, large shifts are being made in the industry, new technologies emerging, many (most?) of them to tackle the traditional difficulties faced in the car audio installation bay... eliminating many "weakest links" that formerly had significant installation workarounds.
Regardless - always question the sources of your new knowledge, don't be afraid to challenge them - truths will always inherently withstand against attacks (and I don't use words like "always" often!) -and those confident of those truths won't fail to be able defend against (or mind) a little devil's advocacy. Or if they aren't able to - that's why these forums exist. Put something out there, and let the world try to slam holes through it.