mtx 9500 vs jl w7

http://www.mtxaudio.com/caraudio/headtohead/w7.cfm

i found this interesting stats sheat, obviously its weighted towards the MTX because they use the 10" models, and jls 10w7 only takes 500 watts compared to the mtx's 750, but if you were going for that punchy bass you get with a 10" woofer, is the mtx a better choice?

has anyonce actually heard both of these woofers in action? id like to hear some input from the forum :)

If you notice, that "comparison" talks up the fact that it's an SPL sub. The W7 is not an SPL sub, although it does a rather nice job on that end, as well.

Since I've not actually heard both of these subs side by side, I would take that info with a grain of salt...

And Maxst, if you've read my previous responses to the Adire/JL Audio comparison, JL Audio outperforms the Adire. This is not conjecture or hear-say, there was a nice long article I read of a test that Adire did comparing their subs to JL's, and Adire "lost". Yes they cost less and yes Adire only failed to outperform the JL Audio sub by a small margin, but it still counts for something (I've never heard a Brahma, either, so I can't say how they sound compared to one another).

well, i do know that i would probly go mtx over jl as well. i heard a 12" 9500 in the vented box it comes with at the local HH gregg and it sounded amazing. the w7 i listened to at HIFI buys sounded worse than the alpine type s that was right next to it. could be several factors that come into play but ill stick with my infinity!

haha the w7 sounded worse than a alpine type s, what was goin on at that store??????????

oh and btw i kno about adire audio, but i was specifically asking about the mtx 9500 and the jl w7 thanks