First of all, thanks Dyon for the information on the ribbons. It was most enlightening. I kept my comments more open ended as I wasn't sure if I was fully correct. Your comments definitely clarified the parts I did not know.
kfr01 wrote:
Also, here's another one for you. I know separate subwoofers are also the fad right now. How do you all feel about placing a powered subwoofer in each front tower. I was thinking sealed Extremis MTM on top playing down to 100hz, then having a powered Shiva column of the tower seated below that. Not that this is a good comparison, heh, but something along these lines: http://www.wilsonaudio.com/products/maxx/index.html My concern / root of the question is this: Is it better to port the Extremis MTM portion of the tower to play as low as possible then have a separate subwoofer located elsewhere in the room pick up only the low bass frequencies... OR Seal the Extremis MTM portion of the tower and place it on top of a bass column? I was also thinking of possibly a couple Koda 8's in the bass column instead of the Shiva. Opinions? |
|
|
That will depend on your intended application. For music listening, a full range tower works great as you only usually need extention down to about 30 Hz. But for theater you need some serious bass to really give that "movie theater" experience. The Extremis driver will have as much extention and impact as our AV8 that is used in the Kit 281. Those kits are well known for their extention, and the Extremis drivers should have similar performance. For music listening, a ported MTM design should work just fine, giving you that extention. Match that with a Shiva and you will get a good balance for music and movies. But if you really want the ultimate HT, then I recomend either a Shiva/Tempest in a large ported enclosure, or better yet step up to the Tumult. I'm willing to bet with that setup you could easily blow away the sound at any movie theater.
The Koda 8's will definitely have more extention. But I don't think they add anything to the design. They will greatly complicate the crossover design and the Extremis drivers will play plenty low to match up with a sub. I think for your first attempt it would be wise to go with a two-way setup (mids,tweet).
kfr01 wrote:
Since the larger drivers are probably 'slower' drivers than the Extremis will I loose some speed and accuracy this way? Thanks again |
|
|
Uh oh, we are getting into one of those popular misconceptions here. The speed and accuracy of a driver is not based on the size or mass of the driver. Transient response is effected by inductance. Here's a very informative tech paper on this topic: http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/TechPapers/WooferSpeed.pdf
The Extremis mid uses a pretty short coil for the excursion it has (one of the benifits of XBL^2) and also has copper in the gap (you can see this in the pictures on our site). This greatly reduces inductance. in fact the inductance of the Extremis mid is a tiny .13 mH. Tweeters usually have about .08-.09 mH, so you can see how low this really is.
Steven Kephart
Adire Audio