the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
icon

OT - Home Stereo Hi-Fi - Help Me Plan


Post ReplyPost New Topic
< Prev Topic Next Topic >
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: January 27, 2005 at 3:12 PM / IP Logged  
Haemphyst, first, let me say thanks for the great input. I'm preparing a response with some follow-up questions, but need to get to a meeting.
Second, quickly, I found here: http://www.audiophilia.com/hardware/rh5.htm
that one of the guys involved in Audio Alchemy started CI Audio with some of the same strategies. (Great products for the price). Anyway, the DAC + Upgrades PSU retail for $450 currently.
I'll be back :-)
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 1:03 PM / IP Logged  

Thanks so much for the reply. Sorry for the slow response. I've been working like mad lately. Getting a few hours of sleep has taken priority over posting on lengthy replies. Finally I have a bit of a breather today...

1.   Alright. First question. I read conflicting information all over the web regarding whether 2 subs are better than one in a stereo system (not HT). It would seem to me that it makes sense to use 2 unless you have a steep xo point below 80hz (that's where bass starts losing it directivity, right?).

2.   Ever since my recent enlightenment regarding the benefits of the 'shortest path' I've been trying to think of how to best design my system around that goal. On that note, do the speaker outputs of those subwoofer plate amps degrade the sound quality?

3.   I've been thinking about trying one of those passive pre-amps. Do you know if the Creek OBH-10 was built to the same quality as the OBH-12? I know it doesn't have the switching feature, but I don't anticipate needing that.

4.   I've been thinking about moving to an RME-Audio card with analog outs. Reviews have said the DACS + Analog outs on these cards rival most very expensive external DAC solutions. My question is this: if I go passive, do I need to concern myself with some sort of output spec (voltage, resistance, etc.) to ensure that I don't need the gain that an active pre provides?

5.   Here's my "realistic goal" system right now. It will have to be a work in progress, but let me know what you think:

RME Analog outs --> Creek OBH-10 ---> Marchland 48/db 2-way xo @ 70hz --->

1) plate amplifier ---> (sub) Creative Sound w/ Adire's XBL^2 technology 10"
2) Integra amp ---> Kit61

6.   With a 48db xo at 70hz it would seem reasonable to seal the Kit61 because of the great extension the extremis provides. The low xo point the extremis can handle, combined with the 48db octave slope should allow me to run a single subwoofer successfully, right? Am I mistaken here? I've always liked the sound of sealed speakers better.

7.   On that note. In your opinion, would it be better to seal the subwoofer, then with a plate amp provide a gentle low freq. parametric eq boost around 25-30hz, or port the subwoofer?

Thanks again! -- Oh, I'm located in good old Iowa, quite a distance from so-cal.                               

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 1:33 PM / IP Logged  
kfr01 wrote:

6.   With a 48db xo at 70hz it would seem reasonable to seal the Kit61 because of the great extension the extremis provides. The low xo point the extremis can handle, combined with the 48db octave slope should allow me to run a single subwoofer successfully, right? Am I mistaken here? I've always liked the sound of sealed speakers better.                          

The extremis mid is more designed to work in a ported enclosure.  In a sealed application you are only going to get response down to the 65 Hz range.  This means you aren't really going to take advantage of the huge excursion it has available.  It will allow you to play the mids at a higher volume level without breaking up, but that really wasn't an issue anyway given my experiences with these speakers thus far.  I'd recommend porting the mids and running a single sub crossed over at say 30 Hz and down.  This way you won't have to worry about soundstage issues as the front speakers will be taking care of any directional content. 

This will also allow you to design the sub for a smaller bandwidth, narrowing your options.  Although the CSS 10 is a great performer, I don't think it would be the right choice for my suggestions above.  I'd recommend a sub that will play down deep (low Fs and long excursion) in a tiny enclosure.  According to Hoffmans Iron Law, this means you are going to need some power to run it and an amp with a good parameteric EQ.  Just don't be surprised if you need a 600+ watt amp. 

Steven Kephart

Adire Audio

kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 2:30 PM / IP Logged  

Steven,

Tumult w/ ADA1200 more what you're thinking for me?

An extra $1k bumps up the cost to this little system - I guess the Tumult and ADA1200 would be fit to make a long haul though.  In the interest of saving money, with that low of a xo (~30hz) point, you're right - I wouldn't have the stereo image issues - even with a 2-4 order xo. 

Your ADA amps don't have a high pass out either via low or high level, right?  Does anyone know of a cheap(er) than Marchand xo that would sound great for crossing mains over to a subwoofer at ~35hz?  A DIY solution even? 

I'm assuming y-cables won't do the trick.  What kind of effect on sound quality would y-cables have in the chain? 

On the ADA, any chance your engineering boys could throw on a fixed frequency 24db high pass pair of pre-outs for an extra $200 or so? ;-)

Thanks!

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 5:17 PM / IP Logged  

Well I was actually thinking a 12" Tumult when they finally come out.  Either that or a Brahma 10 in a 1 cubic foot sealed enclosure  But I figured the ADA amp might have more capability than you need.  So if someone else offered a decent plate amp with a single eq, that would work fine as well.  It would probably also save you some money. 

How large of an enclosure are you willing to go?  Remember, the larger the better for low frequency extention.  It will be much easier on the subwoofer, amplifier, and system.

We do have a high pass filter on the ADA amplifier.  It is 4th order set at like 2 Hz (disabled).  It is designed as a ruble filter that we could add for a customer.  I talked to one of our amplifier engineers and he said that it would cost a lot of money to add the outputs with crossover functionality like you want.  But he said the best thing to do is buy a car crossover and a wall wart to power it.  That's what he did for a while.  His is an a/d/s/ unit that he is trying to sell right now. OT - Home Stereo Hi-Fi - Help Me Plan - Page 2 -- posted image.

Using a Y-adapter shouldn't effect anything.

Steven Kephart

Adire Audio

kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 5:36 PM / IP Logged  

Tumult 12", huh, interesting.   :-)

On the enclosure..  I could live with anything less than 3ft^3.  I don't need an ultra small box.

Thanks for checking on the high pass filter for me. 

Also, how do you feel about running the Tempest instead - in the name of sound quality would I really miss the XBL technology?

Thanks!

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
haemphyst 
Platinum - Posts: 5,059
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Electrical Theory. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: January 19, 2003
Location: Michigan, Bouvet Island
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 6:17 PM / IP Logged  
kfr01 wrote:

Thanks so much for the reply. Sorry for the slow response. I've been working like mad lately. Getting a few hours of sleep has taken priority over posting on lengthy replies. Finally I have a bit of a breather today...

Not a problem... believe me, I know how that can happen sometimes.
kfr01 wrote:

1.   Alright. First question. I read conflicting information all over the web regarding whether 2 subs are better than one in a stereo system (not HT). It would seem to me that it makes sense to use 2 unless you have a steep xo point below 80hz (that's where bass starts losing it directivity, right?).

I am here to tell you from experience that there IS stereo information below 80Hz. It is true, however, that the size of the room, as well as the distance FROM the subwoofer will directly determine the stereo effect you will receive from this information. In most rooms, one sub will suffice. However, this being said, the question arises - How much do you like your bass? Are you willing to fill two corners with large boxes? An additional benefit to using two drivers (or subwoofer systems) for the same output, your driver cone will be moving HALF AS FAR as one driver cone would by itself - this translates to a more linear (twice as linear) bass response, with less (half as much) intermodulation distortion - "IMD" or "Doppler distortions". At regular listening levels, this MAY OR MAY NOT come to be an important fact - it really is determined by what you consider normal listening volumes. TECHNICALLY, bass starts losing directivity where the wavelength EQUALS the distance between your ears - literally. So it may be different for you than it is for me.
kfr01 wrote:

2.   Ever since my recent enlightenment regarding the benefits of the 'shortest path' I've been trying to think of how to best design my system around that goal. On that note, do the speaker outputs of those subwoofer plate amps degrade the sound quality?

That's a loaded question with no clear-cut answer. How good are they? Do they clip on the speaker wire, or can you crank a big ol' thumbscrew down on 'em? Obviously the preferred answer is the second one... Honestly, though, I don't really use plate amps. I bi-wire and usually bi-amp all of my systems. Never have I used a plate amp, although I cannot see how they would be REALLY detrimental to the signal path... If I were to do a plate-amp type of setup, I would look first to Bryston. They make some of the most AWESOME amplifiers I have ever heard, and the power they can make is second to none. Look into the power-pac amps they have. Last time I checked they were pretty reasonable, especially considering their power capabilities. Using the Bryston gear will absolutely necessitate an external crossover, as these amps have NO signal processing capabilities on their own.
kfr01 wrote:

3.   I've been thinking about trying one of those passive pre-amps. Do you know if the Creek OBH-10 was built to the same quality as the OBH-12? I know it doesn't have the switching feature, but I don't anticipate needing that.

Never having had hands-on experience with the OBH-10, I cannot say, but knowing that they use the same potentiometers in all of their passive components, I would guess "yes" - in respect to sound quality. If all you are going to EVER use is one source, go for it - use the OBH-10. HOWEVER, I like having an upgrade path, and the difference in price would probably be worth this forward thinking path. If you are like me, you'll ALWAYS be wanting another component, sooner or later <grin>
kfr01 wrote:

4.   I've been thinking about moving to an RME-Audio card with analog outs. Reviews have said the DACS + Analog outs on these cards rival most very expensive external DAC solutions. My question is this: if I go passive, do I need to concern myself with some sort of output spec (voltage, resistance, etc.) to ensure that I don't need the gain that an active pre provides?

If I am not mistaken, the input impedance on the OBH stuff is around 10K, so the load would be no issue. As long as your output voltage on the soundcard is at least 500 to 750mv, you should have no issue driving pretty much any home amp out there. Obviously, the higher your output voltage, the better you S/N ratio would likely be, so higher would be better in this case...
kfr01 wrote:

5.   Here's my "realistic goal" system right now. It will have to be a work in progress, but let me know what you think:

RME Analog outs --> Creek OBH-10 ---> Marchland 48/db 2-way xo @ 70hz --->

1) plate amplifier ---> (sub) Creative Sound w/ Adire's XBL^2 technology 10"
2) Integra amp ---> Kit61

When I get home tonight, I'll dig up the various alignments I did last night for the Extremis 6.8. I did an optimum alignment for both sealed and vented as well as a custom alignment for sealed and vented. If I am not mistaken the sealed optimum landed right around 9 to 11 liters or so, with an F3 of 63Hz or possibly 73Hz. Either of these numbers would put you right in the neighborhood of what you are looking to do. The Marchand XM-16 crossover DOES come in a DIY configuration, for WAY less money than the full blown toy. If you are planning on leaving it a fixed XO point, and are not really worried about the damping option, this is a great way to save a few dollars!
:::::::EDIT:::::::
Optimum closed box, as per JBL Speakershop:
7.81 Liters
No stuffing
Qtc .707
F3 68.8Hz
Fc 68.7Hz
And the XM-16-A is only 80 dollars per side... then you can put them in YOUR desired enclosure, like I did...
:::::::END EDIT:::::::
kfr01 wrote:

6.   With a 48db xo at 70hz it would seem reasonable to seal the Kit61 because of the great extension the extremis provides. The low xo point the extremis can handle, combined with the 48db octave slope should allow me to run a single subwoofer successfully, right? Am I mistaken here? I've always liked the sound of sealed speakers better.

I also prefer sealed enclosures. (with the possible exceptions of a transmission line subwoofer) I would say yes, you are right on track with what you are looking to do. I am pretty sure the Extremis would like a sealed enclosure - JBL Speakershop said it would, and I've been pretty lucky taking it's word up until now...
kfr01 wrote:

7.   On that note. In your opinion, would it be better to seal the subwoofer, then with a plate amp provide a gentle low freq. parametric eq boost around 25-30hz, or port the subwoofer?

It's really the same thing - an EQ curve. The sealed route requires more amplifier power, because the eq is before the amp, and the driver will take a little more abuse. The vented route is "free" output. It is an acoustic EQ. I say "free" because you will trade off a few things - damping, extension, and transient response...
kfr01 wrote:

Thanks again! -- Oh, I'm located in good old Iowa, quite a distance from so-cal.

OK, well so much for THAT idea... LOL
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 02, 2005 at 8:43 PM / IP Logged  
kfr01 wrote:

Tumult 12", huh, interesting.   :-)

On the enclosure..  I could live with anything less than 3ft^3.  I don't need an ultra small box.

Thanks for checking on the high pass filter for me. 

Also, how do you feel about running the Tempest instead - in the name of sound quality would I really miss the XBL technology?

Thanks!

Ah, I was under the impression that we were going as small as possible.  That is good to hear.  Then actually the CSS 10 would probably work just fine.  Although since you can go with a little larger enclosure, then I would recommend going with a 12 or even a 15. 

The Tempest is a great budget sub.  It has awesome sound and performance, especially for the price.  But I am hooked on the XBL^2 sound.  It's like what high definition is to tv IMO.

Steven Kephart

Adire Audio

kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 04, 2005 at 8:13 AM / IP Logged  
Haemphyst:
Thanks again, I'll post more this afternoon, I'm learning more from you here than I would in weeks of browsing. :-)
Steven:
Have you heard the SX10 in the passive radiator alignment that CSS sells? If so, how does XBL^2 + PR alignment sound?
Thanks!
New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 04, 2005 at 11:37 AM / IP Logged  

Unfortunately no I haven't.  But I do have one of his Clarus subs at home for my small system.  It is a great little performer.  But I haven't tested it on the really low stuff as I live in an apartment. 

I do have some good listening time to XBL^2 ported in our Sadhara sub.  But I haven't heard a PR alignment with one yet.  I can't see it being much different though.  The Sadhara is one of my favorite subwoofers for movies.

Steven Kephart

Adire Audio

Page of 3

  Printable version Printable version Post ReplyPost New Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

  •  
Search the12volt.com
Follow the12volt.com Follow the12volt.com on Facebook
Tuesday, July 15, 2025 • Copyright © 1999-2025 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies
Disclaimer: *All information on this site ( the12volt.com ) is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular use. Any user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and use of this information. Please verify all wire colors and diagrams before applying any information.

Secured by Sectigo
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
Support the12volt.com
Top
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer