kfr01 wrote:
Thanks so much for the reply. Sorry for the slow response. I've been working like mad lately. Getting a few hours of sleep has taken priority over posting on lengthy replies. Finally I have a bit of a breather today... |
|
|
Not a problem... believe me, I know how that can happen sometimes.
kfr01 wrote:
1. Alright. First question. I read conflicting information all over the web regarding whether 2 subs are better than one in a stereo system (not HT). It would seem to me that it makes sense to use 2 unless you have a steep xo point below 80hz (that's where bass starts losing it directivity, right?). |
|
|
I am here to tell you from experience that there IS stereo information below 80Hz. It is true, however, that the size of the room, as well as the distance FROM the subwoofer will directly determine the stereo effect you will receive from this information. In most rooms, one sub will suffice. However, this being said, the question arises - How much do you like your bass? Are you willing to fill two corners with large boxes? An additional benefit to using two drivers (or subwoofer systems) for the same output, your driver cone will be moving HALF AS FAR as one driver cone would by itself - this translates to a more linear (twice as linear) bass response, with less (half as much) intermodulation distortion - "IMD" or "Doppler distortions". At regular listening levels, this MAY OR MAY NOT come to be an important fact - it really is determined by what you consider normal listening volumes. TECHNICALLY, bass starts losing directivity where the wavelength EQUALS the distance between your ears - literally. So it may be different for you than it is for me.
kfr01 wrote:
2. Ever since my recent enlightenment regarding the benefits of the 'shortest path' I've been trying to think of how to best design my system around that goal. On that note, do the speaker outputs of those subwoofer plate amps degrade the sound quality? |
|
|
That's a loaded question with no clear-cut answer. How good are they? Do they clip on the speaker wire, or can you crank a big ol' thumbscrew down on 'em? Obviously the preferred answer is the second one... Honestly, though, I don't really use plate amps. I bi-wire and usually bi-amp all of my systems. Never have I used a plate amp, although I cannot see how they would be REALLY detrimental to the signal path... If I were to do a plate-amp type of setup, I would look first to
Bryston. They make some of the most AWESOME amplifiers I have ever heard, and the power they can make is second to none. Look into the power-pac amps they have. Last time I checked they were pretty reasonable, especially considering their power capabilities. Using the Bryston gear will absolutely necessitate an external crossover, as these amps have NO signal processing capabilities on their own.
kfr01 wrote:
3. I've been thinking about trying one of those passive pre-amps. Do you know if the Creek OBH-10 was built to the same quality as the OBH-12? I know it doesn't have the switching feature, but I don't anticipate needing that. |
|
|
Never having had hands-on experience with the OBH-10, I cannot say, but knowing that they use the same potentiometers in all of their passive components, I would guess "yes" - in respect to sound quality. If all you are going to EVER use is one source, go for it - use the OBH-10. HOWEVER, I like having an upgrade path, and the difference in price would probably be worth this forward thinking path. If you are like me, you'll ALWAYS be wanting another component, sooner or later <grin>
kfr01 wrote:
4. I've been thinking about moving to an RME-Audio card with analog outs. Reviews have said the DACS + Analog outs on these cards rival most very expensive external DAC solutions. My question is this: if I go passive, do I need to concern myself with some sort of output spec (voltage, resistance, etc.) to ensure that I don't need the gain that an active pre provides? |
|
|
If I am not mistaken, the input impedance on the OBH stuff is around 10K, so the load would be no issue. As long as your output voltage on the soundcard is at least 500 to 750mv, you should have no issue driving pretty much any home amp out there. Obviously, the higher your output voltage, the better you S/N ratio would likely be, so higher would be better in this case...
kfr01 wrote:
5. Here's my "realistic goal" system right now. It will have to be a work in progress, but let me know what you think:
RME Analog outs --> Creek OBH-10 ---> Marchland 48/db 2-way xo @ 70hz --->
1) plate amplifier ---> (sub) Creative Sound w/ Adire's XBL^2 technology 10"
2) Integra amp ---> Kit61 |
|
|
When I get home tonight, I'll dig up the various alignments I did last night for the Extremis 6.8. I did an optimum alignment for both sealed and vented as well as a custom alignment for sealed and vented. If I am not mistaken the sealed optimum landed right around 9 to 11 liters or so, with an F3 of 63Hz or possibly 73Hz. Either of these numbers would put you right in the neighborhood of what you are looking to do. The Marchand XM-16 crossover DOES come in a DIY configuration, for WAY less money than the full blown toy. If you are planning on leaving it a fixed XO point, and are not really worried about the damping option, this is a great way to save a few dollars!
:::::::EDIT:::::::
Optimum closed box, as per JBL Speakershop:
7.81 Liters
No stuffing
Qtc .707
F3 68.8Hz
Fc 68.7Hz
And the XM-16-A is only 80 dollars per side... then you can put them in YOUR desired enclosure, like I did...
:::::::END EDIT:::::::
kfr01 wrote:
6. With a 48db xo at 70hz it would seem reasonable to seal the Kit61 because of the great extension the extremis provides. The low xo point the extremis can handle, combined with the 48db octave slope should allow me to run a single subwoofer successfully, right? Am I mistaken here? I've always liked the sound of sealed speakers better. |
|
|
I also prefer sealed enclosures. (with the possible exceptions of a transmission line subwoofer) I would say yes, you are right on track with what you are looking to do. I am pretty sure the Extremis would like a sealed enclosure - JBL Speakershop said it would, and I've been pretty lucky taking it's word up until now...
kfr01 wrote:
7. On that note. In your opinion, would it be better to seal the subwoofer, then with a plate amp provide a gentle low freq. parametric eq boost around 25-30hz, or port the subwoofer? |
|
|
It's really the same thing - an EQ curve. The sealed route requires more amplifier power, because the eq is before the amp, and the driver will take a little more abuse. The vented route is "free" output. It is an acoustic EQ. I say "free" because you will trade off a few things - damping, extension, and transient response...
kfr01 wrote:
Thanks again! -- Oh, I'm located in good old Iowa, quite a distance from so-cal. |
|
|
OK, well so much for THAT idea... LOL
It all reminds me of something that Molière once said to Guy de Maupassant at a café in Vienna: "That's nice. You should write it down."