Is the Hifonics Brutus 1500 any good?
I would possably use the Hifonics amps to push a set of subs but as far as interior speakers, no way. Hifonics used to make a decent 2 and 4 channel amps many years ago but, since have gone down hill quite a bit as far SQ is concerned.
Chris
Alpine CDA-9833 HU Diamond Audio M661 Components MTX Thunder T6.6 Components:rear fill: Cadence Q400 4 Channel Mains + rears Thunder 801D Subs MTX 1004 10's Dual 4g wire to rear 4g groundsI'm pretty sure some of your are familiar with Richard Clark. He actually presented a challenge to anyone willing to accept it years back. It basically backs up the point I was trying to bring across. Amplifier A played within its *limitations* will not sound any different than Amplifier B within its limits. Sub Amp A with Boss/Pyramid and Amp B with Tru, Arc, Cadence, US Amps etc. The point is..you shouldn't buy an amp looking to get better "SQ" as there will be no audible difference between amps until you get into clipping. With that being said, I would reccomend an amp such as JL or Cadence over Boss/Pyramid/Sony etc., BUT the reason I would reccomend them is because of overall build quality, reliability and true ratings. I certaintly wouldn't suggest someone to switch their amps in order to make their speakers sound "better".
Dave Pioneer Premier DEH-P660 15" Kicker CVR Profile AP1000M It's LoudI realize this thread is referring to sub amps, but generalizing that one amp will not make a noticable difference in sound in relation to another is not a good practice. In doing so, we may accidentally send someone that doesn't know any better to Wal-Mart to get a 4-channel amp to push his/her mids and highs because they don't think it'll be any different than something of quality.
My ex once told me I have a perfect face for radio.THE $10,000 AMPLIFIER CHALLENGE RULES {April 21, 2000}
By Richard ClarkThere is no question that all amps are not the same. It is very easy to measure large differences in the performance of amplifiers. This is true in nearly every known specification, including power, noise, distortion, etc. My experience has led me to believe that even though these differences can be easily measured, hearing those differences may not be so easy. Given the relatively small magnitude of performance differences, there is a giant step between amplifier performance and our ability to hear performance differences.It is claimed by designers, manufacturers and especially salespersons that differences in amplifiers are clearly audible. Reasons include "obvious" advantages of one type of circuit topology over another. For example, it is claimed that certain designs have a smoother midrange response whereas other amplifiers exhibit tighter bass. Tube fanatics claim that tube amplifiers have that "warm" sound we all need in our systems. Such descriptive terms are certainly subject to personal interpretation. It is not my intention to determine if one particular amplifier is better than another amplifier. Differences in the quality of the discrete components and constructions are more appropriate for settling the issue of "good - better - best." The sole purpose of my amplifier challenge is to determine if the differences in amplifiers are audible.What differences are Audible?I believe the perceived differences in amplifiers are all due to various factors that can be explained with basic physics and elementary psycho-acoustics. For instance, if two amplifiers are not carefully matched in volume, and one amp is slightly louder than the other, then it would be a simple matter to detect such a difference. In such an example it is important to understand that it is not the circuit topology, quality of the component, design excellence, or superb marketing and packaging that caused the noticeable difference - it was an error in the test setup! It is my present belief that as long as a modern amplifier is operated within its linear range (below overload), the differences between amps are inaudible to the human ear.Comparing AmpsThe idea here is for a test subject to scientifically demonstrate his/her ability to hear differences in amplifiers. It is our job to carefully match the amps so that we are comparing "apples to apples" instead of "oranges to frogs." This means that we sure wouldn't want to compare one amplifier that had + 12 dB of high frequency boost against another amplifier that was adjusted for + 12 dB of bass boost. Such a test would be easy to pass - even on identical amplifiers with consecutive serial numbers.For our comparison test, we aren't concerned with which amplifier sounds best to the test subject. We only require that the listener be able to identify each amplifier when it is powering the speakers. Since many folks seem to believe that amplifiers have some kind of distinctive sonic character, this test should be easy to pass. Right? After all, we're talking about comparing those harsh sounding, high distortion, squeaky "widget As" to those warm sounding, smooth, bass hog "widget Bs."Now pay particular attention to the following sections. Since we're looking for differences in amplifiers, and we already know that those differences are probably going to be very, very small, it is important that the parameters under our control be carefully adjusted so as to be equal as possible. This means that we must be cognizant of differences we might unknowingly introduce between amp A and amp B. They must be adjusted as identical as possible. We already mentioned the importance of volume. The same goes for the L and R balance. It sure would be easy to choose an amplifier that exhibited left side bias over a balanced amp. Right?Well, in order to keep this amplifier comparison test fair, there are a few other parameters that must be considered. I'll list them all in the following section.Amplifier Comparison Test Conditions1. Amplifier gain controls - of both channels - are matched to within +- .05 dB.2. Speaker wires on both amps are properly wired with respect to polarity. (+ and -)3. That neither amp has signal phase inversion. If so correction will be made in #2 above.4. That neither amp is loaded beyond its rated impedance.5. That all amplifiers with signal processors have those circuits bypassed. This includes bass boost circuits, filters, etc. If frequency tailoring circuits cannot be completely bypassed an equalizer will be inserted in the signal path of one (only one and the listener can decide which) of the amps to compensate for the difference. Compensation will also be made for input and output loading that affects frequency response. Since we are only listening for differences in the sonic signature of circuit topology, the addition of an EQ in one signal path only should make the test even easier.6. That neither amp exhibits excessive noise (including RFI).7. That each amp can be properly driven by the test setup. Not normally a problem but it is theoretically a problem.8. That the L and R channels are not reversed in one amp.9. That neither amp has excessive physical noise or other indicators that can be observed by the listener.10. That neither amp has DC OFFSET that causes audible pops when its output is switched.11. That the channel separation of all amps in the test is at least 30 dB from 20Hz to 20kHz.In addition to these requirements the test will be conducted according to the following rules.Amplifier Test Comparison Rules1. To make things easy we would prefer to use high quality home type loudspeakers for the test. If our speakers are not acceptable, the listener can provide any commercially available speaker system as long as it uses dynamic drivers. The actual measured impedance cannot exceed the rated load impedance of the amplifiers tested. If, however, the tester would like to perform the test in a car, we will use a car, however, it will have to be provided by the test subject. For practicality we will have to limit the number of amplifier channels to four or less.2. Amplifiers will be powered from the same power supply at a nominal 14 volts DC. (any voltage is OK as long as it is the same for both amps)3. The test can be conducted at any volume desired; however, the amps will not be allowed to clip. In other words, listening volume can not exceed the power capacity of the smallest amp of the pair being tested. (power capacity will be defined as clipping or 2%THD 20Hz to 10kHz, whichever is less)4. No test signals can be used - only commercially available music.5. The listener can compare two amps at a time for as long as desired. For practical reasons we would like to keep this at least no more than a few hours. A test session will consist of 12 A/B sequences. Passing the test will require a positive identification of each amp for all 12 sequences. Remember, guessing will get you about 6 out of 12. If the differences are so great, and a subject can really hear the difference, then he/she should be able to do so for all 12 sequences.6. To win the $10,000.00, the listener must pass two complete sessions of 12 comparisons. Passing the test means 24 correct responses.* The amp of choice can be compared to the same or a different amp in each session - challengers choice. We have many amplifiers in our demo inventory such as, but not limited to, Alpine, Rockford, Kicker, Phoenix Gold, Precision Power, MTX, Adcom, Kenwood, Pioneer, Sony, etc. You can pick any of them or bring your own.7. All amps must be brand name, standard production, linear voltage amplifiers. This does not exclude high current amps. Amps can not be modified and must meet factory specs. They must be "car audio amplifiers designed to be powered from a car's electrical system."8. Failure of an amp (this includes thermal shutdown) during the test will require that the test be repeated after repair or replacement or cooling of the amp. This means that the entire test session will have to be repeated.9. The amps will not be overloaded during the session from either a voltage or current requirement.10. To save time the listener will have to pass a quick 8 trial session to qualify for the extended 2 session test for the money prize. Any 2 amps can be used for this test. Passing this qualifying test will require at least 6 out of 8 correct answers.11. The amplifier power up and/or power down sequence will not be acceptable for comparison. (The turn on/off noises of some amplifiers would give it away.)12. Although anyone is welcome to take the test, only subjects employed in the car audio industry or Car Sound subscribers are eligible for the $10,000.00 prize.13. Cost to take the test is $100.00. $300.00 for people representing companies. Payable in advance, scheduled appointments only. Done correctly the test takes several hours and I don't have the time if you aren't serious. * Twelve correct responses in a row is certainly a lot of correct listening but $10,000 is also a lot of money for a few hours of easy listening. The way people describe the differences is that they are like night and day. I would certainly not have any trouble choosing between an apple and an orange 12 times in a row. When compared fairly I believe the differences in amps are much too small to audibly detect and certainly too small to pay large sums of extra money for. If I am wrong someone should be able to carefully take this test and win my money. Even if I am right, if enough people take the test eventually someone will take my money due to random chance. This is the reason for the large sample requirement. If you feel that you can easily pass this test but 12 sequences will give you "listening fatigue" I am willing to modify the requirements. Since the way it is being offered is a challenge and only my money is at risk I am willing to let a confident challenger "put his money where his ears are". If we are willing to make this a bet instead of a challenge, I am willing to drop 1 sequence for every thousand dollars put up by the challenger against my money. This would mean:____My___________ _ _Your________Trails Required to win__$10,000 to $0 = 12 Tries$9,000 to $1,000 = 11 Tries$8,000 to $2,000 = 10 Tries$7,000 to $3,000 = 9 Tries$6,000 to $4,000 = 8 Tries$5,000 to $5,000 = 7 Tries$4,000 to $6,000 = 6 TriesI will not do the test with less than 6 trails. It would be statistically meaningless and reduce the challenge to mere gambling.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------of course my challenge includes tube amps---thats what got it started to begin with----while most tube amps have more distortion than transistor amps it is still usually below the audible level of a couple percent---the biggest audible difference is like Big T said---the higher output impedance created by the transformer windings causes a slight frequency dependant amplitude difference---while this is usually less than a db or so except in the worst designs (the "super" amps without negative feedback really have this problem big time)the effect is subtle but audible-----and since it naturally happens at the resonant places of the speaker it is sometimes very pronounced----it is easily duplicated with a small value resistor in series with the speaker-----RC- and just to show you how people misunderstand my challenge someone recently told me he could pass the test if he didn't have to be "blindfolded"----thats what his understanding of a "double blind" test was---so much for scientific understanding..... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------guys my testing procedures are more than fair--and they are set up to help the listener--all you have to do to get the details is to e-mail me atThis is his challenge. I firmly stand behind RC's belief on this one. You could always enter the challenge? It is 10k. Give me a reason why an amp would *sound better* within it's limitations in terms of SQ? Seriously..
Dave Pioneer Premier DEH-P660 15" Kicker CVR Profile AP1000M It's LoudYou cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Search the12volt.com |
Friday, April 26, 2024 • Copyright © 1999-2024 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved • Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies