With a decent mix of equipment: head unit, amplifiers and drivers...most systems will have the crossovers they need, and the fine adjustments can be done using the HU. The problem with planning a system with the addition of an EQ is that there is a preconception that the EQ will take the sound up to another level. So, there is an inherent reliance on the EQ to perform this "upgrade". This preconceived notion that the EQ must perform a vital task may lead to a less-than-stellar setup of the equipment on hand.
But if the system components were chosen for all the right reasons: how you want to listen to the music, compatiblilty with each other, features in and of themselves...the system should be able to be set up to a highly refined level. It is only after the setup, after lengthy listening and sometimes sophisticated testing, that an EQ should be considered to correct flaws that can't be overcome with the installed gear. The reason for the EQ should be that the automobile environment needs some correction, not that the gear that you installed needs help. You can only find the need for environment correction after the system is installed and tuned to its highest ability, and the listening/testing is done.
If you are at the point where you have determined that an EQ could be of additional value, look at the parametric equalizers over the graphic variety for a greater control over the sound. Once the EQ is set, it remains as long as the system hasn't been changed. So, controls do not need to be near your driving position. HERE'S one reference of many that can be found with a google search.
Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
Topic Closed)
Members
Search
Register
Login
Printable version
