the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
icon

parallel constant current source drivers


Post ReplyPost New Topic
< Prev Topic Next Topic >
sallc5 
Member - Posts: 45
Member spacespace
Joined: November 27, 2009
Location: West Virginia, United States
Posted: February 23, 2010 at 6:30 PM / IP Logged  
I am designing an LED array for a tail lamp assembly.
I have decided I want to use constant-current drivers to set the current for each LED string.
I am going to have the tail lamps on at .25-.50 (5mA-10mA) brightness and the brakes/turn signals illuminate at 100% (20mA) brightness.
The tails and stop/turn arrays will be separate arrays but combine to make one when the stop/turn signal is applied.
My question is instead of having the tail LEDs remain on at .25-.50 brightness when the stop/turn signal is applied, how would I have the tails illuminate from .25-.50 (5mA-10mA) to 100% brightness when the stop/turn signal is applied.
I figure I can use two constant current sources drivers in parallel. I am not sure on how to do this though.
If anyone can provide some in sight or an alternative (better? more efficient?) way to accomplish this I am all ears.
Any numbers I used are purely for speculation as I have not decided what size/type of LEDs I will be using.
I did see some LED tails/stop/turn threads but none so detailed.
Thanks in advance!
oldspark 
Gold - Posts: 4,913
Gold spacespace
Joined: November 03, 2008
Location: Australia
Posted: February 24, 2010 at 5:32 AM / IP Logged  
The stop power merely bypasses the smaller current limiter.
EG - Assume 3x3.4V LEDs, the first const-current is (say) 5mA & the 2nd is 20mA followed by the 3 LEDs.
Tail goes to the top of the string hence the 5ma limit.
Stop powers the top of the 20mA (bypasses the 5mA limit).
Further refinement depends on the current limiter circuit - ie, whether a resistor etc can be bridged or shorted by the stop or tail signal
sallc5 
Member - Posts: 45
Member spacespace
Joined: November 27, 2009
Location: West Virginia, United States
Posted: February 24, 2010 at 1:05 PM / IP Logged  
Oh you again? Haha just kiddin! Thanks for the input.
I have been contemplating using a TLE4241GM. Which is made for exactly this purpose. here is the [url=http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/TLE4241_DS_13%5B1%5D.pdf?folderId=db3a30431400ef68011421b54e2e0564&fileId=db3a30431ddc9372011ebaad49bf7f26]data sheet.
I am still new to all this so, could you explain to me how I would go about wiring this up? I diagram would be superb.
TIA!
oldspark 
Gold - Posts: 4,913
Gold spacespace
Joined: November 03, 2008
Location: Australia
Posted: February 24, 2010 at 5:03 PM / IP Logged  
I was thinking of current limiters like:
parallel constant current source drivers -- posted image.
[from vidisonic.com/2008/07/10/current-limiting-circuit/}
But with those TLE4241 I guess you could have as many as desired paralleled and controlled by a PWM that alternates between 2 duty cycles if the TLE4241 output current can go enough.
How did you go with brightness comparisons and resistors?
What current gives you a good taillight dimness? (I assume ~20mA for brakes.)
Why not simply bridge out the resistor for brake lights.
IE - each string has its common resistor at one end.
The extra dimming resistor is at the other end.
The brake signal shorts out (bypasses) the extra dimming resistor.
The common resistor may be at the ground end with the dimming resistor at the +12V (tail power) end. The brake +12V signal connects between the dimming resistor and its LED - through a diode if your are doing it on a per-string basis.
PS - I re-read your OP. I suggest you get some sample LEDs. And also contemplate why you do NOT want a simple resistor (bridging) circuit (or why you want it some complicated?)?
KPierson 
Platinum - Posts: 3,527
Platinum spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: April 14, 2005
Location: Ohio, United States
Posted: February 24, 2010 at 6:24 PM / IP Logged  

I personally don't think I would go this route, but I'm not sure without lots of testing.

Anyway, here is how I think it would hook up:

parallel constant current source drivers -- posted image.

My big issue is that is shows the LEDs wired in series where I would think they would wire in parallel. 

I also feel, that in your case, at least, that you can get comprable results from using a 5vdc regulator and precision resistors to limit the current of each LED.  I would use one resistor per LED so that if one goes out the rest remain active.  In the above drawing if an LED opens up your whole strand is gone!  Not too cool in a brake light, tail light, or turn signal application.  The above chip would be beneficial when using a processor and error detection is critical (ie burned out taillight indicator). 

Are these going to be used on a street vehicle?  If so, don't forget the DOT approval process to make them legal!

Kevin Pierson
oldspark 
Gold - Posts: 4,913
Gold spacespace
Joined: November 03, 2008
Location: Australia
Posted: February 25, 2010 at 5:56 AM / IP Logged  
The 3 in series is ok (3x3.4V = 10.2V etc)
And it's one circuit per string (ie, or 3, or 4, LEDs).
And I saw that the PWM isn't needed - it can be done by the R-ref resistor (as drawn bottom RH of the TLE424; I didn't check the SET options).
But how do you change or short out parallel R-refs? (Is PWM the solution?)
I still reckon resistors that are bypassed with the brake signal via diodes.....
KPierson 
Platinum - Posts: 3,527
Platinum spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: April 14, 2005
Location: Ohio, United States
Posted: February 25, 2010 at 6:38 AM / IP Logged  

yeah, I'm just not a big fan of running any LEDs in series, especially in critical tasks like this.  From an original design perspective it makes more sense to just parallel them all.

I'm also concerned that they arn't showing any parallel LEDs which, to me at least, hints that paralleling the output may not work very well.  I'm not sure why it wouldn't, but you would think they would at least show it on the datasheet.

If you take the "set" line high it internally amplifies the current output by the formula given in the datasheet.  This 'may' provide adequate results, but I don't like the lack of control over the level of amplification.  You would almost be better off changing the Rref value instead of messing with the "set" line.

All the more reason to not use it! 

Kevin Pierson
oldspark 
Gold - Posts: 4,913
Gold spacespace
Joined: November 03, 2008
Location: Australia
Posted: February 25, 2010 at 5:41 PM / IP Logged  
No problems with 3 or 4 LEDs in series. Are you thinking of longer strings?
And if it is current limited, there is no problem whatsoever - LED string issues are to do more with simple resistive current limiting. (Ignoring a single LED or connection failure - but there will be the other parallel strings.)   
But this project elsewhere mentioned a somewhat large number of LEDs - reducing the parallel cost threefold IMO would be worthwhile!
Although that device can supply 83mA, 4 strings could be paralleld, but that IMO defeats the purpose of using it!
Hence I assumed once TLE per string. Of 3 times as many for single-LED strings.
We both seem to be against the use of this TLE device.
The only advantage I can see is to be able to run an independent PWM to all the parallel LED strings and modulate or vary the brightness as desired. But one 8-pin chip per string of LEDs etc etc..... for this? Not in my book.
Hence my question above - what are the 2 currents desired - one is presumably 20mA; what is the other?

Sorry, you can NOT post a reply.
This topic is closed.

  Printable version Printable version Post ReplyPost New Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

  •  
Search the12volt.com
Follow the12volt.com Follow the12volt.com on Facebook
Wednesday, May 15, 2024 • Copyright © 1999-2024 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies
Disclaimer: *All information on this site ( the12volt.com ) is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular use. Any user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and use of this information. Please verify all wire colors and diagrams before applying any information.

Secured by Sectigo
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
Support the12volt.com
Top
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer