the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
icon

Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets?


Post ReplyPost New Topic
< Prev Topic Next Topic >
kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 16, 2006 at 2:29 PM / IP Logged  

Steven Kephart wrote:
Without proper testing equipment, there is no way he can design the crossover specifically for his vehicle. 

Please, if you have time, list what equipment one would need to design a crossover properly. 

I'm not talking world class equipment, but equipment that would get a diyer 90% of the way.

Correct me if I'm totally wrong, but wouldn't this just include:

1) Parts Express USB woofer tester and software;

2) M-Audio USB MobilePre (mic amp and soundcard);

3) Behringer ECM8000 Mic;

4) SoundEasy Loudspeaker Design Software.

All this can be had for under $500.  The end result certainly won't be world class, but if done correctly one should be able to obtain decent results.  Lots of diy enthusiasts build speakers that measure reasonably flat with little more.... 

<sarcasm>Those fools!  Disband the diy loudspeaker community!  Revoke crossover design licenses around the world if you aren't a world class E.E. with a speaker build house in Chile and a Praxis rig.</sarcasm>  Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets? - Page 2 -- posted image.Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets? - Page 2 -- posted image.Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets? - Page 2 -- posted image.

What our friend is talking about should be even easier.  He can use ultra steep digital crossovers and the active unit will fix any frequency response and timing problems. 

Steven, I'm not trying to pick a fight, but I'm a little disappointed to see you discouraging what could be a very satisfying diy project for the original poster.  By the way, I continue to be a huge fan of Adire's drivers.  This past fall I built the 2641 kit and it sounds amazing.  Kudos to all of you at Adire / Exodus / etc.  You've probably seen it, but my review is below:   http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/viewtopic.php?t=23298

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
Steven Kephart 
Platinum - Posts: 1,737
Platinum spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: November 06, 2003
Location: Oregon, United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:46 AM / IP Logged  
kfr01 wrote:
Steven Kephart wrote:
kfr01 wrote:

bogey:

If you're dedicated to DIY speaker building, go ahead and start learning and invest in the equipment.  Don't let Steven scare you off if you really do have a thirst for the knowledge.  A commercial crossover can't be all things for all cars, so even if your home-built crossover isn't professional, it will arguably meet the quality of many mass market models as it will be designed for -your- car.

That's where I disagree.  Without proper testing equipment, there is no way he can design the crossover specifically for his vehicle.  Mass market sets generally are designed to work in most vehicle's, with minor equalization improving the results.  And as the environment has been somewhat taken into account, along with the response of the drivers in that environment; they will more than likely have the better results over an improperly designed DIY set.  Keep in mind that the crossover is THE most important part of the speaker set, even more so than the speaker selection or enclosure they are in.

O.k., but:

1) everyone has to start somewhere;

2) thousands of diy speakers are built a year, with acceptable results, with less than $2k software packages;

3) a thirst for knowledge and experience are always good things;

4) all he has to lose is time and money;

5) if he's fine with that, why should we discourage him from learning?

You never know.  He could buy a reasonably priced measurement mic; find a speaker testing jig for a reasonable price, new or used; download or buy some diy grade software.  Do his homework.   You never know.  He could have a very satisfying diy experience, be 100% happy with the sound, and have learned a load on the way.

Why is this so bad?

2.  That number sounds quite steep.  And I question the "acceptable" part.  I bet under proper scrutiny 90% of them would prove to be less impressive than the builders claim.

3.  I totally agree.  That is why I am sharing what I have learned on this topic, hoping to feed that thirst a little bit.

5.  If my comments sound like discouragment, it is because I believe he is undertaking a very large project and I want him to understand the enormity of it.  Would you encourage an admirer of the Sistine Chapel to attempt to paint a masterpiece with promises that he could acomplish the task?  What are you saying about the true artistic masters when you say that anyone can do it? 

kfr01 
Gold - Posts: 2,121
Gold spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 30, 2003
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 6:09 AM / IP Logged  
Steven Kephart wrote:
kfr01 wrote:
Steven Kephart wrote:
kfr01 wrote:

bogey:

If you're dedicated to DIY speaker building, go ahead and start learning and invest in the equipment.  Don't let Steven scare you off if you really do have a thirst for the knowledge.  A commercial crossover can't be all things for all cars, so even if your home-built crossover isn't professional, it will arguably meet the quality of many mass market models as it will be designed for -your- car.

That's where I disagree.  Without proper testing equipment, there is no way he can design the crossover specifically for his vehicle.  Mass market sets generally are designed to work in most vehicle's, with minor equalization improving the results.  And as the environment has been somewhat taken into account, along with the response of the drivers in that environment; they will more than likely have the better results over an improperly designed DIY set.  Keep in mind that the crossover is THE most important part of the speaker set, even more so than the speaker selection or enclosure they are in.

O.k., but:

1) everyone has to start somewhere;

2) thousands of diy speakers are built a year, with acceptable results, with less than $2k software packages;

3) a thirst for knowledge and experience are always good things;

4) all he has to lose is time and money;

5) if he's fine with that, why should we discourage him from learning?

You never know.  He could buy a reasonably priced measurement mic; find a speaker testing jig for a reasonable price, new or used; download or buy some diy grade software.  Do his homework.   You never know.  He could have a very satisfying diy experience, be 100% happy with the sound, and have learned a load on the way.

Why is this so bad?

2.  That number sounds quite steep.  And I question the "acceptable" part.  I bet under proper scrutiny 90% of them would prove to be less impressive than the builders claim.

3.  I totally agree.  That is why I am sharing what I have learned on this topic, hoping to feed that thirst a little bit.

5.  If my comments sound like discouragment, it is because I believe he is undertaking a very large project and I want him to understand the enormity of it.  Would you encourage an admirer of the Sistine Chapel to attempt to paint a masterpiece with promises that he could acomplish the task?  What are you saying about the true artistic masters when you say that anyone can do it? 

2)  Yes, I'm sure 90% are less impressive than the builders claim.  However, I'd be willing to bet that same 90% sounds better than your average Best Buy HTIAB garbage. 

3)  O.k.  ....  so now that you've scared him a bit, how about listing what he'd need to obtain and what he'd need to read to start learning.  Remember, everyone needs to start somewhere.

4) I did not say anyone could create an artistic masterpiece, did I?  I merely said he should go for it, and he'll probably get results that are acceptable (not crap) if he's willing to do his homework.  Note that this detracts -nothing- from true masters such as Dan.  I followed your advice and bought 3 Exodus kits, rather than build my own, because I wanted gauranteed results.  You gave me good advice, I consider the kit 61 and kit 2641 masterpieces, for the money.  I'm confident I couldn't have obtained the same results by now.

However, for my next speakers I'm sure I'm going to try branching out with my own designs.  DIY is about more than obtaining masterpiece results.  Only fools expect to obtain masterpiece results from their first projects.  DIY is about fun, learning, and the satisfaction of plugging those binding posts in for the first time and not seeing smoke.  DIY is about sitting there knowing, "I made that!" 

To summarize:

1)  DIY detracts nothing from masters like Dan.
2)  Few DIYers expect to obtain masterpiece results
3)  That's fine, because DIY is about more than achieving masterpiece results
3)  Now that we've explored the mountain-like enormity of the task of designing crossovers, how about helping the original poster? 

Remember, even Michelangelo was a DIYer at some point.  In fact, he thought his work on the Sistine Chapel wasn't good enough and that he shouldn't be painting it.  He thought a true master of painting should have been commissioned for that job.  Indeed, a few "masters" of the time complained that the ceiling wasn't as polished, detailed, and finished with enough ultramarine and gold. 

You didn't answer my question re: the beginners kit to crossover building.  What else would the beginner need than the items on my list?

1) Parts Express USB woofer tester and software;

2) M-Audio USB MobilePre (mic amp and soundcard);

3) Behringer ECM8000 Mic;

4) SoundEasy Loudspeaker Design Software.

New Project: 2003 Pathfinder
bogey 
Copper - Posts: 68
Copper spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: October 23, 2003
Location: United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 2:16 PM / IP Logged  
stevdart wrote:
bogey - Your opening question in this thread leaves some important information hanging out there somewhere. We should have some information on the following:
    * "Right now I am in the process of planning upgrades to my system."
I didn't think that my current system was pertinent to the discussion since I want to eventually change out most of it. But fyi, I currently have a Nak CD40 (which I want to trade out for a CD400 or Eclipse CD7000), Alesis MEQ-230 (not hooked up yet), Coustic XM-3e (temporary), Butler Tube 475 (4x75w), MB Quart QM 6.5 Comps., and JL10W6 (not hooked up). The only thing I'll probably hold on to is the Butler amp, unless I can find a good deal on a McIntosh, Brax, Helix, Zapco, or maybe a Sinfoni amp. Right now I'm not focusing on the sub and sub amp. That will come later. Right now I'm leaning toward the Adire Koda 10, so Kephart should be happy. Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets? - Page 2 -- posted image. And I may choose to move on a new Receiver before the speakers, but I still want to plan for them.
stevdart wrote:
You later described that you are looking for what is considered a typical car audio system: a mid/tweeter component set and a subwoofer, which you described here as a "three-way".
I don't recall saying that I was interested in "component system" (in the prefab sense), at least since I read the article that Kephart recommended on the benefits of bi-amping(and tri-amping in Pt.2). That's right, the great article that you recommended started this whole debate. Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets? - Page 2 -- posted image.
I do appreciate all of your posts. It has sobered me up to the cost (financially, but mostly in time and study) to taking on speaker building. However, it has not deterred me from the idea yet. And yes, stevdart, I am very interested in SQ, but I also love to tinker. Everything in my car I've installed (including fiberglass, bondo, wood, etc.) and it doesn't seem to stay in there too long. For me, the journey is the fun part. In addition, I already have half of the stuff the kfr01 mentioned: laptop, the mobile-pre (I have the Alesis version of the M-Audio) and an Audio-Technica AT3035 condenser mic that I've used for recording vocals, which should do the job of the ECM8000 (if not its only $50). It will at least get me started (I'm not sure about the difference with Cardoid vs. Omni-Directional for RTA use I'll have to do some research on that). Also, I'm a year away from a degree in Info. Systems, so I'm computer literate. I say all of this to let you know that I do have some competency and don't mind a challenge. What I would appreciate is direction to learn these things. Going along with this, does any one know anything about the book Loudspeaker Design Cookbook? It looks like it would be a good reference on this topic.
stevdart wrote:
I looked over some of your past threads and have an impression that you are located remotely (?) and so you don't have access to shops and dealers to audition some nice component sets. Do I understand that right? So, you are relying heavily on opinions and reviews. Let the forum know if that's not the case.
You are right, I am in a somewhat remote area as far as "high-end" audio is concerned. I have had experience with the Boston Pro/rally line, MB Quart QSD, PSC, and QM, JL XR, and Alpine TypeR. The best ones from this list IMO are the Boston Pros (I like the mid over the tweeter) and the QSD (these sounded great, but not for the money IMO). From this experience I have learned that I generally prefer the sound of a soft dome tweeter over a metallic. Part of the reason I started this thread was to give me a little more of an idea of what some you considered very good sq drivers. That way, since I travel to Memphis, TN and Oklahoma once or twice a year to see friends, I could tailor my trip to include stops to demo these drivers that you recommended. So certainly I "don't want to rely on reviews and opinions," but they do give me a place to start.
DYohn 
Moderator - Posts: 10,741
Moderator spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Electrical Theory. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 22, 2003
Location: Arizona, United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:01 PM / IP Logged  

This has been an interesting discussion.  IMO Vance Dickason's Loudspeaker Design Cookbook is a must have for any DIY speaker builder, especially when one is just starting out.  Invaluable knowledge in the book, as well as some really excellent DIY designs to use or modify to suit your needs.  If you want to buy one, order it HERE and the12volt.com gets a little kick-back from Amazon!

I say go for it.  As long as you realize that most text-book crossovers (i.e. ones produced using standard calculators) may or may not sound the way you expect and you are willing to experiment and do some testing (you have sufficient tools) building passive crossovers is a lot of fun.  I love to experiment and see how many different ways I can make a set of speakers sound by tweaking the crossovers.

Also, do not discount the quality of the crossovers provided by manufacturers of higher-end component sets.  I have been very impressed lately with the factory passives shipped with a set of Eclipse comps I installed in my vehicle.  Very detailed and accurate.  I do not think I could have done better.

Support the12volt.com
bogey 
Copper - Posts: 68
Copper spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: October 23, 2003
Location: United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:20 PM / IP Logged  
Thanks Dyohn,
Dyohn wrote:
If you want to buy one, order it HERE and the12volt.com gets a little kick-back from Amazon!
Yeah, sure, that sounds great. I assume that I would have to use the link from the 12volt. However, I noticed that the that link is to the 6th edition that's not in print, not the new 7th edition. Could you (or whoever takes care of that) update the link and let me know?
Do you agree with kfr01's assessment of needed tools? It makes sense to me. I would assume that a Digital Multi-Meter might also come in handy. Any suggestions, bang for the buck?
bogey 
Copper - Posts: 68
Copper spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: October 23, 2003
Location: United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:29 PM / IP Logged  
I don't know what happened to stevdart's post. It came in between my and kfr01's last post. Computer glitch, perhaps? If for some reason it was intentional I suppose that person could do it again, so I'll repost it for him from my notification email. This way folks won't think I'm some nut for quoting a person that didn't seem to appear in the thread. Thoughts on High End Mids/Tweets? - Page 2 -- posted image.
stevdart wrote:
Posted By: stevdart
It's exasperating getting through and around all the quotes-within-quotes every time a new remark is posted. Why on earth do you! guys do that?
Anyway, my pet peeve. I'm following this discussion with interest, and will offer an opinion in this particular case. It may be an unwelcome one, but if so it won't be the first time I've offered on of those. :) We all know that one size doesn't fit all.
bogey - Your opening question in this thread leaves some important information hanging out there somewhere. We should have some information on the following:
    * "Right now I am in the process of planning upgrades to my system."
What is the system you currently have, and what about it, in your opinion, needs improvement?
    * "The first thing I want to concentrate on is the selection of my mids (6.5") and highs (any size) to help me plan the rest of the system. I am planning on running a 3way system..."
You later described that you are looking for what is considered a typical car audio system: a mid/tweeter component set and a subwoofer, which you described here as a "three-way". What is the "rest of the system" that you referred to? I looked over some of your past threads and have an impression that you are located remotely (?) and so you don't have access to shops and dealers to audition some nice component sets. Do I understand that right? So, you are relying heavily on opinions and reviews. Let the forum know if that's not the case.
Because of the content of some of your questions, I (Dr Phil) think you should try to listen to some different brands of matched components in order to get a feel for the sound that you consider best. I agree with Kephart's comments in this thread that mixing drivers and using an active filter network to define your system may not be the best route for you to go (although we are arriving at that conclusion using different reasons). You don't want to rely on reviews and opinions in this matter.
I also agree with kfr01 that the hobby of speaker building is richly satisfying. I just think you should build upon it a little differently by increasing your knowledge and experience through the use of engineered systems. The system you're looking for is common and simple - component set and sub- and you will probably achieve best results using a paired combination mid/tweet set. That may not result in the fun experience of building that you're looking for, but may best satisfy your thirst for an SQ system.
I get the feeling that your ultimate goal is high quality sound in your car more than the process of learning how to design a sound system. Tell me if I'm off base.
DYohn 
Moderator - Posts: 10,741
Moderator spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Electrical Theory. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 22, 2003
Location: Arizona, United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:37 PM / IP Logged  

Oops, I'll see about getting that link fixed.

I use True Audio's TrueRTA software ( http://www.trueaudio.com/rta_abt1.htm) and a Behringer ECM8000 microphone ( http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?&DID=7&Partnumber=248-625) and a Dell laptop computer with a full-duplex sound card to take measurements of speaker output.  Then I can tweak crossovers to tame peaks, etc.  Lots of folks like free Speaker Workshop or similar software (like the pro-level and very much NOT free Praxis) because it allows you to model crossovers before you build them.  This method saves time and is preferred for manufacturers.  For hobbyists, as long as you don't mind wielding the soldering iron and buying a batch of components, trial and error is more time consuming but equally satisfying when results are achieved.

Support the12volt.com
stevdart 
Platinum - Posts: 5,816
Platinum spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spaceThis member consistently provides reliable informationspace
Joined: January 24, 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:40 PM / IP Logged  

I pulled my post, bogey, because I finally realized that I was just running interference and don't have much value to add to this discussion.  But not before you saw it, obviously.  The busybody in me thought this thread may have veered off course a bit in regards to what you were asking.  The assumption that you were referring to a 3-way system plus sub, for example.  And DYohn is encouraging you to go ahead with this but talking about passives...whereas I thought you were considering all active.  Most of the gear you have expressed an interest in or already own is out of my league, and actives is an area I know extremely little about. 

What I wanted to do, though, is try to get to the basics of what you are trying to accomplish.  That starts with what you are listening to now and what you feel is needed to improve it.  Your last post indicates that you are now listening to one set of MBQs, powered by a Butler amp and no subwoofer.  (The bunches of brand names that interspice this thread tends to confuse things, at least to me.)  You are not satisfied with the current sound and want to improve it.  Right away, I see an obvious lack of musical frequencies/dynamics by not having the subwoofer installed.  That addition would enhance the mids and help a lot with SQ.  There are other install issues that may be tweaked, too, like damping in the doors, rear deck and trunk areas.  Altogether creating a great improvement in sound quality.

In summary it's this, at least from my perspective:  do you have a complete system installed, as well as it possibly can be, and are able to pick it apart for flaws that you would like to correct with your next system incarnation?

Build the box so that it performs well in the worst case scenario and, in return, it will reward you at all times.
DYohn 
Moderator - Posts: 10,741
Moderator spaceThis member has made a donation to the12volt.com. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Electrical Theory. Click here for more info.spaceThis member has been recognized as an authority in Mobile Audio and Video. Click here for more info.spacespace
Joined: April 22, 2003
Location: Arizona, United States
Posted: February 17, 2006 at 3:45 PM / IP Logged  
Active crossovers are a much easier route in car audio.  You'll still need an RTA-type test platform to set it up properly.
Support the12volt.com
Page of 3

  Printable version Printable version Post ReplyPost New Topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

  •  
Search the12volt.com
Follow the12volt.com Follow the12volt.com on Facebook
Wednesday, May 8, 2024 • Copyright © 1999-2024 the12volt.com, All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy & Use of Cookies
Disclaimer: *All information on this site ( the12volt.com ) is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular use. Any user assumes the entire risk as to the accuracy and use of this information. Please verify all wire colors and diagrams before applying any information.

Secured by Sectigo
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer
Support the12volt.com
Top
the12volt.com spacer
the12volt.com spacer